patrick.net

I suspect the 5% of people who think they can beat a grizzly bear have never seen one in person.

HeadSet says

I suspect the 5% of people who think they can beat a grizzly bear have never seen one in person.

Tough to even beat a regular bear.

mell says

Tough to even beat a regular bear.

Yep. Not too long ago a black bear killed a hunter in Dismal Swamp. When the story was in the papers, nobody, not even other hunters, felt any pity. After all, that guy was hunting bear, he just lost.

HeadSet says

I suspect the 5% of people who think they can beat a grizzly bear have never seen one in person.

Grizzly is one of the most deadly creatures in North America. They can kill a bull with a single hit in the head, breaking its neck and scrambling its brains. Without a weapon, basically meaning a gun, you have no chance.

If you're out hunting and shoot one, you damned well better kill it. If you run across a cute little cub (and they are cute!) reverse direction and retreat. They tend to ignore people, but I've seen adults climbing into and out of garbage bins - well fed ones probably pose little threat, but a hungry and entirely wild one could kill you without much effort at all.

BTW, a Kangaroo would kick your guts out literally. They fight by balancing on their tail and kick. They will dismember you. Most animals will retreat if you attack, they will only fight if they are cornered or threaten their young.

richwicks says

HeadSet says

I suspect the 5% of people who think they can beat a grizzly bear have never seen one in person.

Grizzly is one of the most deadly creatures in North America. They can kill a bull with a single hit in the head, breaking its neck and scrambling its brains. Without a weapon, basically meaning a gun, you have no chance.

If you're out hunting and shoot one, you damned well better kill it. If you run across a cute little cub (and they are cute!) reverse direction and retreat. They tend to ignore people, but I've seen adults climbing into and out of garbage bins - well fed ones probably pose little threat, but a hungry and entirely wild one could kill you without much effort at all.

BTW, a Kangaroo would kick your guts out literally. They fight by balancing on their tail and kick. They will dismember you. Most animals will retreat if you attack, they will only fight if...

You even have to be at least somewhat careful with deer when they're with their young. They can stomp quite well ;)

richwicks says

Grizzly is one of the most deadly creatures in North America.

Wasn't it at the San Diego Zoo that an African lion leaped into the grizzly enclosure and was killed immediately by the bear?

mell says

You even have to be at least somewhat careful with deer when they're with their young. They can stomp quite well ;)

@mell

Yes, they can:


original link

HeadSet says

Dismal Swamp

Wow, that's a real place:

https://www.ncparks.gov/dismal-swamp-state-park/home

Great name.

Patrick says

HeadSet says

Dismal Swamp

Wow, that's a real place:



Of course it is a real place. And it is more in Virginia than Carolina. Notice how the place is huge and empty of even forest:

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_613345ebe4b04778c005755e

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

HeadSet says

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

The flawed writing (incorrect and inconsistent capitals, spacing, etc.) suggests they are one of those "75 IQ" people.

Also they singled out Asians in particular, who are now back in the focus of Ghetto Hate.

HeadSet says

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

It would be one of many many such hoaxes intended to stir up controversy and therefore donations and funding for BLM etc.

That guy has a fantastic attitude.

"Last week a Richard Barris (@peoplespundit) conducted & Creative Destruction media-funded poll was released showing that 60% of voters in GA want a full forensic audit & even more believe there was funny business in the 2020 election in GA.

Yet GA Gov Kemp & SOS Raffensberger are making no movement to represent the will of their constituents & voters.

Why?

Part of it could be the revelation that both Kemp & Raffensberger are repped by an ATL firm that specializes in running Progressives as Republicans, but that's not all of it.

They know that as long as the vote is rigged, they owe nothing more than lipservice, if even that, to their constituents as they can just use the magic fraud machines & leftist army to rig the next election.

So what are the ramifications of that?

Firstly, it shows that our representative constitutional Republic is gone, as the representatives no longer have to care about the consent of the governed.

One indicator that this fraud machine had been in place long before 2020 is the hallmark of Dem / leftist policies- open borders - that the vast majority of Americans have long been opposed to, shown even in the most left-leaning polls conducted for decades.

Yet since the Obama administration they've worked very hard to go against the #1 issue for both their own base and the US voting public at large.

But it's the other factor that worries me the most.

Any honest broker (so not the MSM) looking into the 2016 election understood that it was the result of a populace who were extremely unhappy with their elites, governing and "ruling" classes.

It was a rebuke by a majority of Americans to the direction they saw he country going in.

4 years of President Trump showed them just how different it COULD be: a secure border, not paying the bills of the world i.e. NATO, the WHO and a large number of consortiums that the US foots the bill for yet offer us little to nothing in return.

Most importantly, Americans across all classes and races saw their wages rise and taxes decline.

Now add on top of that a near majority of the electorate having serious questions about the 2020 election, leaders in states where the populace want full forensic audits pushing back against them with everything they have, and an implosion in approval numbers for Biden as "normies" and non-MAGA realize the people they were told would be the "adults back in charge" if they voted for Biden are actually corrupticrats and imbeciles who've been allowed to "fail upward" their entire lives because they go to the right parties and say the correct woke slogans in public (despite often getting caught living the opposite of those woke values).

So what happens in 2022 when we see these same elected reps who've won the ire and hatred of their electorate win their races, much like CA just watched with Newsome, who immediately made mail in voting permanent so he never has to worry about losing power?

You see, even though the machines are PART of the problem, they are only part.

Even if we get rid of them, we still have armies of leftist ideologues who've spent decades inculcating themselves into the voting process to enact the manual fraud for elections.

Remember SharpieGate in AZ? I haven't seen anyone really dive into those numbers, even in the audit hearing last week.

But rest assured, anywhere you have abnormally high ballot adjudication rates, it's because you have an army of ideologues in place to ensure they get all the votes their preferred corrupticrat needs, regardless of what the ballots actually say.

So in this place where we currently are, where an unhappy electorate put an outsider in charge in 2016, saw just how good it could be without swamp creatures in the POTUS position but then had their votes stolen in 2020 to put the ultimate swamp creature (and Dementia patient) in charge - what happens when those people see their widely hated representative who went strictly against their will, win their elections in 2022 and 2024?

I fear that will be a bridge too far for the American people.

I have a lot of respe..." https://t.me/FirstAmendmentPraetorian/5593

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Booger says

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Isn't that what CNN does daily, just vs whites?

https://archive.is/sCpG5

Rachele Mussolini wins most votes in Rome city council election

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

Booger says

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

I wonder what comparables they used to calculate that figure?

Booger says

Probably from the FBI graphic's department's.

Please explain? What is that device?

HeadSet says

Please explain? What is that device?

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

Let me explain what the original comic was. A character ask a gay man "why did you chose to be gay" and then it's HEAVILY implied that as a CHILD the gay man was molested by an adult, and the punchline is "I didn't (chose to be gay).

Well, which group started ritual male genital mutilation? It's implied that forced circumcision is causing anti-Antisemitism. It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised, but I wouldn't know, since I was circumcised for "my health" when I was a baby.

I don't think children should be circumcised.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

Good excuse for having four times as much sex.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.