patrick.net

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_613345ebe4b04778c005755e

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

HeadSet says

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

The flawed writing (incorrect and inconsistent capitals, spacing, etc.) suggests they are one of those "75 IQ" people.

Also they singled out Asians in particular, who are now back in the focus of Ghetto Hate.

HeadSet says

I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.

It would be one of many many such hoaxes intended to stir up controversy and therefore donations and funding for BLM etc.

That guy has a fantastic attitude.

"Last week a Richard Barris (@peoplespundit) conducted & Creative Destruction media-funded poll was released showing that 60% of voters in GA want a full forensic audit & even more believe there was funny business in the 2020 election in GA.

Yet GA Gov Kemp & SOS Raffensberger are making no movement to represent the will of their constituents & voters.

Why?

Part of it could be the revelation that both Kemp & Raffensberger are repped by an ATL firm that specializes in running Progressives as Republicans, but that's not all of it.

They know that as long as the vote is rigged, they owe nothing more than lipservice, if even that, to their constituents as they can just use the magic fraud machines & leftist army to rig the next election.

So what are the ramifications of that?

Firstly, it shows that our representative constitutional Republic is gone, as the representatives no longer have to care about the consent of the governed.

One indicator that this fraud machine had been in place long before 2020 is the hallmark of Dem / leftist policies- open borders - that the vast majority of Americans have long been opposed to, shown even in the most left-leaning polls conducted for decades.

Yet since the Obama administration they've worked very hard to go against the #1 issue for both their own base and the US voting public at large.

But it's the other factor that worries me the most.

Any honest broker (so not the MSM) looking into the 2016 election understood that it was the result of a populace who were extremely unhappy with their elites, governing and "ruling" classes.

It was a rebuke by a majority of Americans to the direction they saw he country going in.

4 years of President Trump showed them just how different it COULD be: a secure border, not paying the bills of the world i.e. NATO, the WHO and a large number of consortiums that the US foots the bill for yet offer us little to nothing in return.

Most importantly, Americans across all classes and races saw their wages rise and taxes decline.

Now add on top of that a near majority of the electorate having serious questions about the 2020 election, leaders in states where the populace want full forensic audits pushing back against them with everything they have, and an implosion in approval numbers for Biden as "normies" and non-MAGA realize the people they were told would be the "adults back in charge" if they voted for Biden are actually corrupticrats and imbeciles who've been allowed to "fail upward" their entire lives because they go to the right parties and say the correct woke slogans in public (despite often getting caught living the opposite of those woke values).

So what happens in 2022 when we see these same elected reps who've won the ire and hatred of their electorate win their races, much like CA just watched with Newsome, who immediately made mail in voting permanent so he never has to worry about losing power?

You see, even though the machines are PART of the problem, they are only part.

Even if we get rid of them, we still have armies of leftist ideologues who've spent decades inculcating themselves into the voting process to enact the manual fraud for elections.

Remember SharpieGate in AZ? I haven't seen anyone really dive into those numbers, even in the audit hearing last week.

But rest assured, anywhere you have abnormally high ballot adjudication rates, it's because you have an army of ideologues in place to ensure they get all the votes their preferred corrupticrat needs, regardless of what the ballots actually say.

So in this place where we currently are, where an unhappy electorate put an outsider in charge in 2016, saw just how good it could be without swamp creatures in the POTUS position but then had their votes stolen in 2020 to put the ultimate swamp creature (and Dementia patient) in charge - what happens when those people see their widely hated representative who went strictly against their will, win their elections in 2022 and 2024?

I fear that will be a bridge too far for the American people.

I have a lot of respe..." https://t.me/FirstAmendmentPraetorian/5593

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Booger says

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Isn't that what CNN does daily, just vs whites?

https://archive.is/sCpG5

Rachele Mussolini wins most votes in Rome city council election

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

Booger says

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

I wonder what comparables they used to calculate that figure?

Booger says

Probably from the FBI graphic's department's.

Please explain? What is that device?

HeadSet says

Please explain? What is that device?

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

Let me explain what the original comic was. A character ask a gay man "why did you chose to be gay" and then it's HEAVILY implied that as a CHILD the gay man was molested by an adult, and the punchline is "I didn't (chose to be gay).

Well, which group started ritual male genital mutilation? It's implied that forced circumcision is causing anti-Antisemitism. It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised, but I wouldn't know, since I was circumcised for "my health" when I was a baby.

I don't think children should be circumcised.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

Good excuse for having four times as much sex.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

HeadSet says

I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

Ratings from 1 to 10:
1. Big bowl of chocolate ice cream with sprinkles: rated 9

2. Sex with uncircumcised men: rated 1.5

3. Sex with circumcised men: rated 1.25

4. Sex with very rich, very powerful famous man who can be sexually extorted: rated 10

Circumcision does not reduce pleasure, the only reports of it doing so are in a tiny minority of the adult circumcised, and those usually because they had a medical disease like when smegma makes it so you can't pull back the foreskin and gets all infected.

In WW2, all the combatants, from the UK to US, to Italy and Germany, performed thousands of emergency circumcisions due to filthy dirt getting trapped under the foreskin, causing abrasions, and the lack of regular bathing contributed to a large infection rate. Probably the reason the Egyptians did it. The US, being the most circumcised, had the lowest rate of emergency circumcisions.

I believe the only case of Penile Cancer in the US among circumcised males between the 1950s and 1990s was found in a man who was circumcised in his 20s due to continual infections due to shit getting trapped inside the foreskin. Wet and Dark vs. Airy and Dry...

The Religion excuse doesn't fly, since Pagan Arabs and Egyptians, along with Pagan indigenous tribes in SE Asia and South America and Africa, with no sex hangups, also circumcised.

It's just a medieval superstition with no science behind it, it's like anti-vaping, some people just want to believe that vaping is almost as harmful as smoking so seek to ban it, despite hundreds of millions of dollars over the decade thrown at it by Tobacco and Nicotine Patch growers and makers (ie Big Pharma). In Portugal, they think Circumcised Men rape more. In the USA, the most circ'd groups are the LEAST likely to rape, however.

The San Fran Freakos who want to ban circumcision also pierce the ears of infants, sometimes even tattoo them. Many are gay men who simply prefer the uncircumcised penis and if they are circumcised, have lost the ability to feel pleasure due to aggressive masturbation or continuous rough sex, which dulls the nerves. Same reason they Gillum out on poppers and blood pressure meds and hypnotics. Like everything else, these Urban Sad Sacks blame it on their parents.

Another reason Gay Men like to be uncircumcised is that the foreskin rolls back and forth over the glans during anal sex; statistically insignificant differences have been found in the average time to orgasm between circ'd and uncirc'd men during vaginal penetration or masturbation. It's possible that circumcision was an anti-Anal measure? Unlikely though.

A lot of anti-circ in the USA goes back to the Hippy Naturalistic Fallacies of the 70s.

The number of infections in the very small population of pierced infants and toddlers greatly exceeds any problems, no matter how minor, in the majority of infants that are still circumcised, which carries great health benefits Europeans, who have no culture of circumcision, grasp at straws to deny. Whereas the rate of European penis problems, esp. among pre-teens who aren't known for their enthusiastic self-hygiene, is exponentially higher than the USA.

Look at the population of the Middle East and several African societies where they circumcise, men still want to fuck and enjoy it.

Finally, it's a myth that many cultures don't circumcise. From New Guinea to Arabia to South America, circumcision of some kind was as common than not and typically related to passage into manhood.

Foreskins are an excellent donor tissue for skin grafts, and they cover enormous territory because they can be webbed and stretch so much. "I know you are happy to see me because your skin graft is pulsing." LOL! I don't know that that is a great reason to keep them, aside from the doggy dick drama of their appearance.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

if less skin on penis was a good thing, it would happen evolutionary. but it didn't.

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Yes, it probably has some protective function.

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

HeadSet says

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

It depends on the situation, but there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless, not the appendix (microbiome), not pubic hair (prevents chafing), and not foreskin. IMO it should be removed when there is too much foreskin which happens in quite a few, otherwise left alone. Either way it's not a significant procedure, neither early nor later on. It's become so routine that it's not dangerous and there are pros and cons to both sides. Not worth fighting over IMO, it's def not the same as mutilating females.

mell says

pubic hair (prevents chafing)

I've read that the evolutionary purpose for pubic hair may be to help with the evaporation of certain pheromones to advertise sexual availability.

But yes, I agree that there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless. Evolution doesn't keep what you don't need. For example, fish which evolve in perfectly dark caves for millions of years completely lose their eyes. The reason is that eyes occasionally get infected, so they become a net loss in total darkness, leading to selection against eyes.

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views