patrick.net

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Booger says

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10042091/Black-family-harassed-monkey-noises-neighbors.html

Isn't that what CNN does daily, just vs whites?

https://archive.is/sCpG5

Rachele Mussolini wins most votes in Rome city council election

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

Booger says

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/575642-3-million-euros-worth-of-nazi-memorabilia-found-in-alleged

I wonder what comparables they used to calculate that figure?

Booger says

Probably from the FBI graphic's department's.

Please explain? What is that device?

HeadSet says

Please explain? What is that device?

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.

Let me explain what the original comic was. A character ask a gay man "why did you chose to be gay" and then it's HEAVILY implied that as a CHILD the gay man was molested by an adult, and the punchline is "I didn't (chose to be gay).

Well, which group started ritual male genital mutilation? It's implied that forced circumcision is causing anti-Antisemitism. It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised, but I wouldn't know, since I was circumcised for "my health" when I was a baby.

I don't think children should be circumcised.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

Good excuse for having four times as much sex.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

HeadSet says

I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

Ratings from 1 to 10:
1. Big bowl of chocolate ice cream with sprinkles: rated 9

2. Sex with uncircumcised men: rated 1.5

3. Sex with circumcised men: rated 1.25

4. Sex with very rich, very powerful famous man who can be sexually extorted: rated 10

Circumcision does not reduce pleasure, the only reports of it doing so are in a tiny minority of the adult circumcised, and those usually because they had a medical disease like when smegma makes it so you can't pull back the foreskin and gets all infected.

In WW2, all the combatants, from the UK to US, to Italy and Germany, performed thousands of emergency circumcisions due to filthy dirt getting trapped under the foreskin, causing abrasions, and the lack of regular bathing contributed to a large infection rate. Probably the reason the Egyptians did it. The US, being the most circumcised, had the lowest rate of emergency circumcisions.

I believe the only case of Penile Cancer in the US among circumcised males between the 1950s and 1990s was found in a man who was circumcised in his 20s due to continual infections due to shit getting trapped inside the foreskin. Wet and Dark vs. Airy and Dry...

The Religion excuse doesn't fly, since Pagan Arabs and Egyptians, along with Pagan indigenous tribes in SE Asia and South America and Africa, with no sex hangups, also circumcised.

It's just a medieval superstition with no science behind it, it's like anti-vaping, some people just want to believe that vaping is almost as harmful as smoking so seek to ban it, despite hundreds of millions of dollars over the decade thrown at it by Tobacco and Nicotine Patch growers and makers (ie Big Pharma). In Portugal, they think Circumcised Men rape more. In the USA, the most circ'd groups are the LEAST likely to rape, however.

The San Fran Freakos who want to ban circumcision also pierce the ears of infants, sometimes even tattoo them. Many are gay men who simply prefer the uncircumcised penis and if they are circumcised, have lost the ability to feel pleasure due to aggressive masturbation or continuous rough sex, which dulls the nerves. Same reason they Gillum out on poppers and blood pressure meds and hypnotics. Like everything else, these Urban Sad Sacks blame it on their parents.

Another reason Gay Men like to be uncircumcised is that the foreskin rolls back and forth over the glans during anal sex; statistically insignificant differences have been found in the average time to orgasm between circ'd and uncirc'd men during vaginal penetration or masturbation. It's possible that circumcision was an anti-Anal measure? Unlikely though.

A lot of anti-circ in the USA goes back to the Hippy Naturalistic Fallacies of the 70s.

The number of infections in the very small population of pierced infants and toddlers greatly exceeds any problems, no matter how minor, in the majority of infants that are still circumcised, which carries great health benefits Europeans, who have no culture of circumcision, grasp at straws to deny. Whereas the rate of European penis problems, esp. among pre-teens who aren't known for their enthusiastic self-hygiene, is exponentially higher than the USA.

Look at the population of the Middle East and several African societies where they circumcise, men still want to fuck and enjoy it.

Finally, it's a myth that many cultures don't circumcise. From New Guinea to Arabia to South America, circumcision of some kind was as common than not and typically related to passage into manhood.

Foreskins are an excellent donor tissue for skin grafts, and they cover enormous territory because they can be webbed and stretch so much. "I know you are happy to see me because your skin graft is pulsing." LOL! I don't know that that is a great reason to keep them, aside from the doggy dick drama of their appearance.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

if less skin on penis was a good thing, it would happen evolutionary. but it didn't.

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Yes, it probably has some protective function.

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

HeadSet says

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

It depends on the situation, but there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless, not the appendix (microbiome), not pubic hair (prevents chafing), and not foreskin. IMO it should be removed when there is too much foreskin which happens in quite a few, otherwise left alone. Either way it's not a significant procedure, neither early nor later on. It's become so routine that it's not dangerous and there are pros and cons to both sides. Not worth fighting over IMO, it's def not the same as mutilating females.

mell says

pubic hair (prevents chafing)

I've read that the evolutionary purpose for pubic hair may be to help with the evaporation of certain pheromones to advertise sexual availability.

But yes, I agree that there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless. Evolution doesn't keep what you don't need. For example, fish which evolve in perfectly dark caves for millions of years completely lose their eyes. The reason is that eyes occasionally get infected, so they become a net loss in total darkness, leading to selection against eyes.

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views

Booger says

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views

It won't be actually opposing viewpoints. It will be strawman arguments.

Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?

There's a LOT of propaganda around the Holocaust and WWII.



And it's still being produced today.

richwicks says

Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?

They kept the shoes to reuse, just like they kept the gold tooth filings.

And never underestimate the German's love of Red Tape. So many hundreds of thousands of pages. Supply Chains must be tracked or Gotdammt Kaos!!!


Nazis made great use of the Weimar Anti-Extremist law that Registered Guns between 34-38. They were able to individually disarm any likely opponents, including all Jews of course. Obviously, the gun registration, like the anti-hate speech laws, failed to prevent any extremism, Communist or Nazi.

Of course, denying a Genocide is the final phase of one, as the Turks-Kurds can tell you about Armenians, or many Soviet Apologists about the Holodmor.

The same reason the Elite wants the Vax Passports.
https://freedomwire.com/ibm-vaccine-passports/

Patrick says

Another example: far more Russians died in WWII than Jews did, about 27 million Russians. But we are not taught that in school.

Yep, The very first mass killings by the Nazis weren't Jews, but current and retired Polish local leaders, from Professors to former Police Chiefs and Mayors, to School Deans and popular Priests and Pastors. The mass executions began before the fall of Warsaw and were in the tens of thousands by the end of 1939.

The ultimate goal of the Nazi Regime was lebensraum, which you can't get if the Slavs are still around in large numbers in Poland and Russia. The Jews were the test run, and as the most despised by all parties would face the least resistance. Himmler already had maps renaming South Ukraine and Crimea "Gotenau", after the old Gothic Kingdom there and estimated Aryanization under Ahnenerbe ("Ancestral Heritage") policies would take about 20 years after their defeat of the USSR.

Select details about Generalplan Ost was a great book called "POLAND UNDER NAZI OCCUPATION" by two non-Jewish Polish authors,

https://web.archive.org/web/20110409034704/http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm

Interestingly, the Germans felt the Poles could not be totally exterminated, because they were too fiercely patriotic and too aggressive AND the rest of the world would see their extermination as a threat (whereas Jews and Russians wouldn't piss many off), therefore they would be slowly deported over the Urals, but in small numbers and greatly dispersed, lest they intermingle with the native Siberians and create a future Polish Threat.

https://www.tampafp.com/california-school-district-bans-political-flags-after-two-students-use-a-teachers-pride-flag-for-toilet-paper/

California School District Bans Political Flags After Two Students Use A Teacher’s Pride Flag For Toilet Paper

I only want to date white people:

I think it's a mistake to talk about race at all.

The oligarchy wants to divide us with race so that we don't talk about how the oligarchy is screwing all of us.

Patrick says

I think it's a mistake to talk about race at all.

The oligarchy wants to divide us with race so that we don't talk about how the oligarchy is screwing all of us.

I think like they cater to various groups based on power those groups have over elections. For example, you know it too. If you tear down Floyd statue, it'll be hate crime. But if you tear down statue of a Catholic priest... it's "understandable".

I think if right developed a counter to the left wing cancel culture, to a point government was actually afraid of them as much as they are of black people rioting, things would change. It wouldn't be a one way street like it is now.

Patrick says

Tourists who visit Dachau are often "disappointed" that there are no gas chambers.

I'm a bit doubtful of the story of gas chambers at all.

There's no point in transferring people to a concentration camp, just to kill them although I'm certain the people unable to work, were killed.

I'm as old as you. When I was a kid, it was accepted as FACT that Jewish bodies were being rendered into soap and their skin being used for lampshades. None of those stories are true. We didn't have DNA technology then, but we do now.

It's, shocking, how much propaganda there is still accepted as fact, but it is what it is. You're not allowed to discuss it, any attempt to discuss it gets you branded as anti-Semitic as well. I hate that propaganda survives to become "fact".

And it's quite possible, I'm wrong about my beliefs, but I can't find out, because it's become impossible to have a reasonable discussion with it. I've had to deal with Hasbera more times than I can count. The Israeli government has NO PROBLEM with defaming people, ruining people, and lying to people. They are one of the most ethically bankrupt governments on this planet.

Remember when it was said that when the Palestinians disarmed the conflict would end? Well, when is the last time the West Bank attacked Israel? Still, the settlements grow. In time the Palestinians will be entirely destroyed and a complete fiction of history will be created to make it morally justified.