6
0

The Prick does it again.


 invite response                
2017 Sep 23, 6:13pm   29,067 views  170 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (13)   💰tip   ignore  

He just picked a fight with the NFL and has them and the Democrats basically defending the 6-figure and millionaire players' right not to stand for the anthem.

"I'm so oppressed, I just signed a multimillion dollar contract. I just have to kneel during the National Anthem."

A private in the US Army makes $1600 a month. Is he allowed to kneel when the Anthem is played without jeopardizing his career?

The difference of course, is the private has an important job, whereas an NFL Player is just an entertainer.

"Leave the oppressed guys who make 6-7 Figures alone, Orange Douche! If the NFL wants to market itself as America's Pastime while kneeling in front of the flag (which started under a Black President, BTW), nobody should criticize it!"

« First        Comments 51 - 90 of 170       Last »     Search these comments

51   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 8:24am  

mell says
There are a lot of problems there, none of which can be solved by somebody with a 114MM contract kneeling at the Anthem


Bullshit. Have you ever studied Dr. King?
52   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 8:25am  

PCGyver says
Let me guess, you hate liberal

Nope, i find them amusing. But I also fear them, their unbridled hate and willingness to use violence to drown out the opposition free speech rights is very dangerous, especially when they cloak it under peace, tolerance, love and righteousness.
53   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 8:27am  

lostand confused says
trump exercised his free speech, now if he passed a law or an executive order on the same-I would be up in arms condemning him. he expressed his opinion-oh the irony-liberals now claim free speech itself is under threat because the president used his first amendment rights-hate, hate, hate.


He would be well within his rights to express his opinion as a private citizen. The problem is he is speaking as the leader of the United States trying to silence a private citizen's free speech.
54   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 8:32am  

joeyjojojunior says
He would be well within his rights to express his opinion as a private citizen. The problem is he is speaking as the leader of the United States trying to silence a private citizen's free speech.


No he is not. he is expressing his opinon in a campaign rally. NFL does not have to listen and in fact the NFL commisioner came out against him -I think.

Now if he even does any steps against NFL-that would alarm me tremendously. Because if it starts there, it can go anywhere and must be vigorously opposed.

But by twisting this into a free speech issue- WHEN THE LEFT IS DEMANDING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES NOT USE HIS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS-that scares normal people even more. if the president can't express his opinion-who can???? Yeah I know-only one who expresses leftie view and sings kumbaya of kapernick. Any opposing view has to be drowned out -hate, hate, hate.
55   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 8:39am  

lostand confused says
No he is not. he is expressing his opinon in a campaign rally


When you become President of the United States, you speak for the United States.

lostand confused says
But by twisting this into a free speech issue- WHEN THE LEFT IS DEMANDING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES NOT USE HIS FREE SPEECH RIGHTS-that scares normal people even more. if the president can't express his opinion-who can???? Yeah I know-only one who expresses leftie view and sings kumbaya of kapernick. Any opposing view has to be drowned out -hate, hate, hate.


Give me a break. The left is alerting people that the President of the United States is advocating for limiting the free speech of private citizens. That should bother you. Why doesn't it?
56   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 8:58am  

joeyjojojunior says

When you become President of the United States, you speak for the United States

Free peech and taking action are two different things-which eludes lefties.

joeyjojojunior says
Give me a break. The left is alerting people that the President of the United States is advocating for limiting the free speech of private citizens. That should bother you. Why doesn't it?

The left is upto their usual tricks-attempting to silence the president of the United States no less. This should be alarming. if the president praised Kapernick-the left would be very happy. Since he says something different-they erupt into their usual hateful, bigoted nonsense-cloaked in their peace,tolerance love cloak.

This is arming-very alarming for all Americans . Only one way of thought and speech is allowed-anything else-EVEN the President of the United states dare not open his mouth-or else. We live in scary times-Thank God for trump.
57   komputodo   2017 Sep 24, 8:59am  

joeyjojojunior says
What isn't allowed is the President of the US trying to stifle free speech, however.


Stifle? Who are you, Archie Bunker?

58   socal2   2017 Sep 24, 9:30am  

Just remember what these overpaid mooks are protesting - labeling all our cops as a bunch of murderous racists. Remember Kaepernick's socks?



Of all the problems facing the black community. Being randomly murdered by a racist cop is pretty low on the list statistically.

This is the hill the NFL and Democrats want to die on?
59   deepcgi   2017 Sep 24, 9:54am  

To me, it feels like the players who refuse to stand are calling me, and everyone else who does stand in honor of our country, racists.

Half of the country votes to the right. An equally great number of NFL fans vote to the right. They respect and honor these black football players. Surprise! That’s where your huge paychecks comes from.

Try as you might, no one will ever see you as Rosa Parks, the real badass, when you return to the locker room to put on your Armani silk suit and drink champagne in the stretch back to the Hilton suite.
60   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Sep 24, 10:01am  

joeyjojojunior says
Free speech is obviously only worth defending when it's Milo or Alex Jones or the KKK marching. When it's a black athlete--shut up and play nice.


Yep. When a white IT guy who isn't on TV can write a memo on not be fired. When a couple can refuse to bake a cake because they don't endorse gay marriage. Yet an employee on live television can conduct a protest while on the employer's time, and suffer no reprecussions. However, if he wore Cancer Awareness or 9/11 Remembrance eye black, the NFL would fine his ass more than most people make in a month as they've done time and time again to fellow Players. I remember when they banned the Cowboys wearing decals to remember the murdered cops at all regular games.

Total Bullshit.
61   anonymous   2017 Sep 24, 10:17am  

Joey Democrat is at it in full force today. This must be a battleground topic that was identified by his manager early this morning.
62   Ceffer   2017 Sep 24, 10:23am  

Recruit thugs, get a thug outcome. Makes perfect sense.

Loyalty to country is too abstract when you are focussed on narrow warlord tribalism, and football is if anything a re-enactment of narrow tribalism. Most of them are going to lose their money in idiot, grandiose ways and die with brain damage, which for most of them, was a narrow ledge to begin with.

Drop the anthem, there IS no higher purpose for these guys.

The owners are just big business whores worried about their money.
63   FortWayne   2017 Sep 24, 10:38am  

Those NFL players are just acting like spoiled liberal pricks.
64   RC2006   2017 Sep 24, 11:43am  

It was inevitable with BLM, thug culture, and everything else that this behavior would rear it's head in the NFL. Lets see if throwing black power signs becomes the norm next every time a white gets tackled.
65   steverbeaver   2017 Sep 24, 12:42pm  

rpanic01 says
It was inevitable with BLM, thug culture, and everything else that this behavior would rear it's head in the NFL. Lets see if throwing black power signs becomes the norm next every time a white gets tackled.

Hahaha. Things like this were once goofball speculation... not anymore, sadly! Seriously though, fuck the NFL on this. They need to reel this in quick or they are going to suffer quite a bit at the hands of former fans.
66   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 2:40pm  

lostand confused says
Free peech and taking action are two different things-which eludes lefties.


Nope--The President of the US and a private citizen are two different things. Seems to elude you.


lostand confused says
The left is upto their usual tricks-attempting to silence the president of the United States no less.


lol--you're hilarious. The President is trying to stifle free speech and once again Trumpkins try to turn it around. Has there every been a bigger bunch of babies? The only thing they are good at is feeling sorry for themselves and complaining about how mistreated they are. Get over yourself already.
67   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 2:44pm  

TwoScoopsMcGee says
Yep. When a white IT guy who isn't on TV can write a memo on not be fired. When a couple can refuse to bake a cake because they don't endorse gay marriage. Yet an employee on live television can conduct a protest while on the employer's time, and suffer no reprecussions. However, if he wore Cancer Awareness or 9/11 Remembrance eye black, the NFL would fine his ass more than most people make in a month as they've done time and time again to fellow Players. I remember when they banned the Cowboys wearing decals to remember the murdered cops at all regular games


What's bullshit is your utter hypocrisy. You want/demand ESPN to fire Jamele Hill, but throw a pissy fit when the IT gets fired. In both cases it is up to their employer to decide whether or not repercussions are necessary. Once again the Trumpkins are like whiny babies. Do you want Big Government to make all the rules for society? Is that your solution?

If you don't like the NFL, don't fucking watch it. That is your choice. That's how things work in a free society. If you don't like ESPN, don't fucking watch it
68   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 2:47pm  

anonymous says
Joey Democrat is at it in full force today. This must be a battleground topic that was identified by his manager early this morning.


That's right. I'm making big bucks.

Don't tell me you post for free CIC?
69   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 2:52pm  

joeyjojojunior says
ol--you're hilarious. The President is trying to stifle free speech and once again Trumpkins try to turn it around. Has there every been a bigger bunch of babies? The only thing they are good at is feeling sorry for themselves and complaining about how mistreated they are. Get over yourself already.

Same old, same old. Does logic ever enter that leftist fog or are you ina perpetual state of trigglypuff.??/
Once aaain-the president stated his opinion in a campaign rally no less. The left goes bonkers and wants him silenced. It is you who are and have been trying to stifle free speech for decades. Only one form of thought and speech allowed and it has to be approved by us.
70   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 3:40pm  

lostand confused says
Same old, same old. Does logic ever enter that leftist fog or are you ina perpetual state of trigglypuff.??/
Once aaain-the president stated his opinion in a campaign rally no less. The left goes bonkers and wants him silenced. It is you who are and have been trying to stifle free speech for decades. Only one form of thought and speech allowed and it has to be approved by us.


He's campaigning as the President of the United States. I don't want him silenced at all. I want him to start behaving like the leader of the free world and someone who wants to defend the Constitution of the United States.

It's ironic that you say only one form of thought and speech is allowed because that is EXACTLY what Trump is saying. Kaep's free speech shouldn't be allowed.

If you don't like impingement of free speech, you should be outraged by Trump's statement.
71   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 3:41pm  

me123 says

TwoScoopsMcGee says
You gonna pony up that part of the US Code where it says the President doesn't have Freedom of Speech?


The part where it says the President will uphold the Constitution?
72   komputodo   2017 Sep 24, 5:51pm  

joeyjojojunior says
You want/demand ESPN to fire Jamele Hill,
\>

In case you weren't aware, there is huge difference between WANTING and DEMANDING.
73   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 5:54pm  

Who demanded?
74   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 5:57pm  

joeyjojojunior says
EXACTLY what Trump is saying. Kaep's free speech shouldn't be allowed.

No he is not. You liberals and propoganda. if I go to my work and go to meetings and kneel during meetings and call white people racists and whit privileged fools-i will be fired. That is nto free speech-that is soemone else's business-their rules-the same as the NFL.
75   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 6:15pm  

lostand confused says
No he is not. You liberals and propoganda. if I go to my work and go to meetings and kneel during meetings and call white people racists and whit privileged fools-i will be fired. That is nto free speech-that is soemone else's business-their rules-the same as the NFL.


Yep, you might get fired. It's up to your employer.

In this case, it is/was up to the NFL. Not you. Not Trump.

The only free speech issue is Trump trying to stifle a private citizen. And Trump telling a business how it should treat its employees.

Are you in favor of Big Government telling private businesses how to run their operations? I never pictured you for a nanny state wannabe.
79   lostand confused   2017 Sep 24, 7:04pm  

joeyjojojunior says
Are you in favor of Big Government telling private businesses how to run their operations? I never pictured you for a nanny state wannabe

The president of the United states expressed his free speech rights ina campaign rally. The end. Stop your spinning. Baghdad Bob would be proud of you.
80   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 7:29pm  

lostand confused says
The president of the United states expressed his free speech rights ina campaign rally. The end. Stop your spinning. Baghdad Bob would be proud of you.


And that "free speech" was the President of the United States telling a private corporation how they should run their business.
81   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 24, 7:30pm  

me123 says
Good, so you want him to be the opposite of Obama, who bowed down to other countries 's leaders and ignored the constitution. Glad to see you woke up finally after 8 years.


And once again, Trump supporters show they cannot defend their President. Their only choice is to try to deflect and bring up Obama and/or Clinton.
82   FortWayne   2017 Sep 24, 7:46pm  

NFL is disgrace if they surrender patriotism to some blm whiners.
83   MrMagic   2017 Sep 24, 8:12pm  

joeyjojojunior says
And once again, Trump supporters show they cannot defend their President.


Once again, we see the hypocrisy of the Obama voters.
84   MAGA   2017 Sep 24, 8:30pm  

Today I spent some time with one of our hospitalized veterans as a VA Volunteer. This vet has been in a long term coma. His parents have asked me to visit their son whenever possible.

I'm sure he would love to be able to get out of bed and stand for the National Anthem.

85   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Sep 24, 9:09pm  

joeyjojojunior says
Nope--The President of the US and a private citizen are two different things. Seems to elude you.


Hahahahahahahaha. Found that Section of the US Code yet?

How about Vice Presidents? Is their free speech restricted, those Nattering Nabobs of Negativity?

Meanwhile, in one of the most diehard Blue Areas of the country:
New England fans boo their own players.

http://nypost.com/2017/09/24/patriots-fans-rain-boos-on-own-players-for-anthem-protest/


Remember, the Flag and the Anthem aren't Trump. It actually reveals a great deal that the MSM and Left mix them up
86   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Sep 25, 12:35am  

Wait...are they protesting cops killing black people in greater numbers than other races(a notion that is false) or are they protesting Trump? Or is it something else?

If these imbeciles, and that is what they are, truly have one shit about black lives, they'd stop having kids they couldn't possibly properly raise and encourage the same of others.
87   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Sep 25, 8:50am  

No matter how hard the AltLeft and greedy, cowardly NFL try, the National Anthem isn't Trump.

Reminder: Kneeling for the anthem began under Obama. The AltLeft politicized this first. Turnabout is fair play, so maximum shame mode and personalization/demonization should be active. In more than a year, the NFL has taken no steps to restrict divisive political protests by their own employees on national television.

While it fines players for wearing Remember 9/11 cleats, the NFL all of a sudden has discovered Free Speech. They want it to go away fast, they figure it's better to appeal to the youth (but making a big mistake since most AltLeft hate Football), and are too afraid to discipline their employees for Making Divisive Political Statements During Work Hours, so they figure by inventing some "Unity" bullshit, they'll silence the detractors.

The NFL is trying to call kneeling for the National Anthem "unity", as if a slick ad that is so obnoxiously laughable and discordant is going to fool anybody.
"Nothing says unity that some players deliberately disrespecting the national anthem before a game on TV."

I mean, if you put this in a novel and submitted to a publisher, they'd reject it for pushing the boundaries of belief too far.

Keep Personalizing and Demonizing. Make Goodell and Kaepernick and other "Oppressed" Multimillionaires the focus. The incongruity of privileged, wealthy athletes complaining about Oppression.

Keep banging the issue. The fact the Blue Loyalists hate it so is a sign it's highly effective and very dangerous. Just like Hillary Clinton's book tour, where she blames dozens of groups for her loss, is beautiful self-inflicted wounds that should be encouraged.

Never get in your enemies way when he makes a mistake. Indeed, encourage it.
88   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 25, 9:01am  

And again--you are free to not watch the NFL to your hearts content. That's called free choice.

Go shopping at Hobby Lobby and have Chick-Fil-A for lunch. That should make you feel better.
89   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 25, 9:10am  

TwoScoopsMcGee says
The Politicization of Football began before Trump. It's time to hold the tax-exempt Monopoly responsible and not let them getting away with sweeping this under the rug. It's important that AltLeft Idenitarian Divisiveness be exposed and criticized.


In other words, it's time for the Nanny State Government to tell businesses how they need to operate. That's your theory?
90   joeyjojojunior   2017 Sep 25, 9:14am  

TwoScoopsMcGee says
The swamp is a tax-free Billion-dollar entity claiming to be All American, fining Players for wearing 9/11 gear, but tolerating employees on the clock creating Divisiveness against the very country that makes their million-dollar income possible on national television.

No more, NFL. It's not going away.

Keep Attacking.


By all means--keep attacking!

You think attacking people for protesting is a winning move? lol--please keep it up!

« First        Comments 51 - 90 of 170       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste