WHITE TERROR: bombings in Austin, Texas
invite response
2018 Mar 21, 9:30am 27,331 views 102 comments
« First « Previous Comments 52 - 91 of 102 Next » Last » Search these comments
52
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 2:37pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 2:37pm
Sniper says
Yeah i noticed his bait and switch too. Very weak, illogical argument
What's been pointed out with the delusional Libbies is that laws already exist on the books that make these acts illegal, but the Libbies think adding NEW laws will stop future attacks.
Yeah i noticed his bait and switch too. Very weak, illogical argument
53
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 2:38pm
CBOEtrader says
No, my point is we should all be non-bigoted and not assume anything.
Just fyi:
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
In this situation, there is no association between his christian family, and his actions. Unless they find a manifesto where he says something to that nature than calling it WHITE or CHRISTIAN terror is pure bigotry. Its a deplorable move... but go ahead and try to make your bigoted point if ya like.
No, my point is we should all be non-bigoted and not assume anything.
Just fyi:
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
54
RWSGFY
2018 Mar 21, 2:40pm
RWSGFY
2018 Mar 21, 2:40pm
HappyGilmore says
Convenient. Why 9/11 is excluded? Because it tips the scale in unwanted direction?
"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
Convenient. Why 9/11 is excluded? Because it tips the scale in unwanted direction?
55
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 2:42pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 2:42pm
HappyGilmore says
So you are being hypocritical with the intent to show that someone else is hypocritical. FACEPALM
The left is today so lost in their foolish righteousness that they justify obvious deplorable behavior. Its ok to be racist against whites, because some white guy somewhere behaved racist once.
This is the logic that leads to death camps. Please stop the righteous racism before things get worse.
No, it's just a chance to, once again, show the hypocrisy of the Trump supporters.
So you are being hypocritical with the intent to show that someone else is hypocritical. FACEPALM
The left is today so lost in their foolish righteousness that they justify obvious deplorable behavior. Its ok to be racist against whites, because some white guy somewhere behaved racist once.
This is the logic that leads to death camps. Please stop the righteous racism before things get worse.
56
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 2:47pm
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 2:47pm
HappyGilmore says
Wow, just wow...
..."In their June study, the foundation decided to examine groups “engaged in violent extremist activity” and found that white extremists were by far the most dangerous. They pointed to the recent Emanuel AME Church shooting in Charleston, S.C., and the 2012 attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as well as many lesser-known attacks on Jewish institutions and on police. They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.
This is what is being used to support a narrative? Unbelievable
Hell, 48 get killed in a month in Chicago.
Just fyi:
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
Wow, just wow...
..."In their June study, the foundation decided to examine groups “engaged in violent extremist activity” and found that white extremists were by far the most dangerous. They pointed to the recent Emanuel AME Church shooting in Charleston, S.C., and the 2012 attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as well as many lesser-known attacks on Jewish institutions and on police. They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.
This is what is being used to support a narrative? Unbelievable
Hell, 48 get killed in a month in Chicago.
57
mell
2018 Mar 21, 2:48pm
Satoshi_Nakamoto says
Those studies have been debunked many times cause they group everything Caucasian without motive under white extremism. The real numbers are the polar opposite to what they claim.
HappyGilmore says"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
Convenient. Why 9/11 is excluded? Because it tips the scale in unwanted direction?
Those studies have been debunked many times cause they group everything Caucasian without motive under white extremism. The real numbers are the polar opposite to what they claim.
58
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 2:50pm
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 2:50pm
HappyGilmore says
This is a very weak argument as well, since whites outnumber Muslims in America by something like 40 to 1.
The fact that Muslim terrorist attacks are similarly frequent means that Muslims are attacking innocent Americans at about 40 times the reverse rate.
"Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11"
This is a very weak argument as well, since whites outnumber Muslims in America by something like 40 to 1.
The fact that Muslim terrorist attacks are similarly frequent means that Muslims are attacking innocent Americans at about 40 times the reverse rate.
59
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 2:50pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 2:50pm
Sniper says
Debunk this very quickly:
Whites are more than 70% of the US Population.
Muslims are 1% of the US Population.
Therefore, White Supremacists would have to kill hundreds of people each year to merely EQUAL the Islamic Domestic Fatalities in the USA.
..."In their June study, the foundation decided to examine groups “engaged in violent extremist activity” and found that white extremists were by far the most dangerous. They pointed to the recent Emanuel AME Church shooting in Charleston, S.C., and the 2012 attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as well as many lesser-known attacks on Jewish institutions and on police. They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.
Debunk this very quickly:
Whites are more than 70% of the US Population.
Muslims are 1% of the US Population.
Therefore, White Supremacists would have to kill hundreds of people each year to merely EQUAL the Islamic Domestic Fatalities in the USA.
61
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 2:51pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 2:51pm
mell says
Exactly. And the opposite, like the DC Sniper, isn't considered an Islamic Attack, even though the notebook is filled with Quranic Quotes and he asks Allah to help him kill.
And I think one of the US Base attacks, though clearly Islamic, isn't counted as a Terror Attack but as "Mental Illness" (as is Mohammed Allen or whatever the DC Sniper was called).
While the guy who hated the IRS and crashed a plane into it, is counted as White Supremacist Terror, even though the guy wasn't at all racist and simply hated the IRS. A terrorist maybe, but not a White Surpemacist one.
Those studies have been debunked many times cause they group everything Caucasian without motive under white extremism. The real numbers are the polar opposite to what they claim.
Exactly. And the opposite, like the DC Sniper, isn't considered an Islamic Attack, even though the notebook is filled with Quranic Quotes and he asks Allah to help him kill.
And I think one of the US Base attacks, though clearly Islamic, isn't counted as a Terror Attack but as "Mental Illness" (as is Mohammed Allen or whatever the DC Sniper was called).
While the guy who hated the IRS and crashed a plane into it, is counted as White Supremacist Terror, even though the guy wasn't at all racist and simply hated the IRS. A terrorist maybe, but not a White Surpemacist one.
62
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 3:08pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 3:08pm
TwoScoopsPlissken says
That doesnt even count cherrypicking dates. "Since 911..." You mean when terrorists killed 3000 americans? OK, so since then they have to manipulate data to suggest that white extremists have killed 48 people. How does anyone not see the foolishness of this logic?
Sure lets just leave out the event that killed 60 times the number of people that white extremists supposedly have killed in the last 17 years. Seems totally reasonable. DOUBLE FACEPALM
Sniper says..."In their June study, the foundation decided to examine groups “engaged in violent extremist activity” and found that white extremists were by far the most dangerous. They pointed to the recent Emanuel AME Church shooting in Charleston, S.C., and the 2012 attack on a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, as well as many lesser-known attacks on Jewish institutions and on police. They found that 48 people were killed by white terrorists, while 26 were killed by radical Islamists, since Sept. 11.
Debunk this very quickly:
Whites are more than 70% of the US Population.
Muslims are 1% of the US Population.
Therefore, White Supremacists would have to kill hundreds of people each year to merely EQUAL the Islamic Domestic Fatalities in the USA.
That doesnt even count cherrypicking dates. "Since 911..." You mean when terrorists killed 3000 americans? OK, so since then they have to manipulate data to suggest that white extremists have killed 48 people. How does anyone not see the foolishness of this logic?
Sure lets just leave out the event that killed 60 times the number of people that white extremists supposedly have killed in the last 17 years. Seems totally reasonable. DOUBLE FACEPALM
63
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 3:11pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 3:11pm
TwoScoopsPlissken says
Yeah if you go into the details of the data, it is all garbage. Total idiocy on a platter only accepted by those affected by the worst confirmation bias.
A terrorist maybe, but not a White Surpemacist one.
Yeah if you go into the details of the data, it is all garbage. Total idiocy on a platter only accepted by those affected by the worst confirmation bias.
64
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 4:35pm
Satoshi_Nakamoto says
Because that's when they chose to start the study?
CBOEtrader says
Yes, it's a common technique to help others see their own faults. People see it immediately in others, but are painfully blind and unable to see it in themselves.
Convenient. Why 9/11 is excluded? Because it tips the scale in unwanted direction?
Because that's when they chose to start the study?
CBOEtrader says
So you are being hypocritical with the intent to show that someone else is hypocritical. FACEPALM
Yes, it's a common technique to help others see their own faults. People see it immediately in others, but are painfully blind and unable to see it in themselves.
65
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 4:36pm
Still waiting for Two Scoops source on DNC or media calling him a White Terrorist.
Coming soon?
Coming soon?
66
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 4:38pm
Sniper says
There are so many to choose from. In this case, Trump supporters are all "Don't jump to any conclusions, let's wait and see the motive"
What hypocrisy would that be?
There are so many to choose from. In this case, Trump supporters are all "Don't jump to any conclusions, let's wait and see the motive"
67
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 4:39pm
CBOEtrader says
lol--Is someone going to tell me why we have any laws on the books at all??
Criminals don't follow them, so what's the point???
Sniper saysWhat's been pointed out with the delusional Libbies is that laws already exist on the books that make these acts illegal, but the Libbies think adding NEW laws will stop future attacks.
Yeah i noticed his bait and switch too. Very weak, illogical argument
lol--Is someone going to tell me why we have any laws on the books at all??
Criminals don't follow them, so what's the point???
69
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 5:09pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Mar 21, 5:09pm
Speaking of White Terror, within 24 hours of this guy blowing himself up, we have multiple footage released by the Austin PD.
Where is the Footage of the Las Vegas Shooter? Been like 6 months.
They're both dead so neither is awaiting trial, so what gives LVPD?
Where is the Footage of the Las Vegas Shooter? Been like 6 months.
They're both dead so neither is awaiting trial, so what gives LVPD?
70
justme
2018 Mar 21, 5:09pm
justme
2018 Mar 21, 5:09pm
rando says
People may not realize, or not care, but I personally quite agree that white men as a group are badly treated in US society. Indeed, all men are treated very badly in almost all countries of the world. But the proper response to that problem is not to paper over the occurrences of white (and christian) males killing people as mental illness, while jumping on opportunities to denounce non-white non-christian males misdeeds as "terrorism". The solution to the mistreatment of white males is not to exclaim, at every opportunity, "look at those non-white non-Christian (meaning Muslim) men, they are much worse than us, they are TERRORISTS!".
Indeed, there is a group of predominantly white and so-called Christian men in Washington that are responsible for killing large number of Muslims, and by a huge factor, maybe 400X if you look at 5k dead US soldiers and 2M dead in the Middle East wars. Not to speak of completely demolishing entire cities in order to rid them of terrorists that the US Government pretty much enabled or created with previous and ongoing evil and stupid actions.
What this thread is about is the hypocrisy of these Washington (mostly) white men (and women such as Condoleeza Rice, Hillary Clinton, Viktoria Nuland), and their murder-apologist supporters that uncritically enable this mass slaughter. There exists no valid moral reason for 2M dead Arabs in the ME since 2003. It is all complete bullshit and psychopathic power games.
It dumbfounds me that people do not understand this.
CBOEtrader saysjust seems like the left cant skip a chance to shit on white men
The unifying theme of the NY Times and NPR is that they shit on white men every day,
People may not realize, or not care, but I personally quite agree that white men as a group are badly treated in US society. Indeed, all men are treated very badly in almost all countries of the world. But the proper response to that problem is not to paper over the occurrences of white (and christian) males killing people as mental illness, while jumping on opportunities to denounce non-white non-christian males misdeeds as "terrorism". The solution to the mistreatment of white males is not to exclaim, at every opportunity, "look at those non-white non-Christian (meaning Muslim) men, they are much worse than us, they are TERRORISTS!".
Indeed, there is a group of predominantly white and so-called Christian men in Washington that are responsible for killing large number of Muslims, and by a huge factor, maybe 400X if you look at 5k dead US soldiers and 2M dead in the Middle East wars. Not to speak of completely demolishing entire cities in order to rid them of terrorists that the US Government pretty much enabled or created with previous and ongoing evil and stupid actions.
What this thread is about is the hypocrisy of these Washington (mostly) white men (and women such as Condoleeza Rice, Hillary Clinton, Viktoria Nuland), and their murder-apologist supporters that uncritically enable this mass slaughter. There exists no valid moral reason for 2M dead Arabs in the ME since 2003. It is all complete bullshit and psychopathic power games.
It dumbfounds me that people do not understand this.
71
Bd6r
2018 Mar 21, 5:18pm
Bd6r
2018 Mar 21, 5:18pm
justme says
And enrichment of a selected segment of population - ones who already are ultra-rich.
It is all complete bullshit and psychopathic power games.
And enrichment of a selected segment of population - ones who already are ultra-rich.
72
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 5:29pm
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 5:29pm
justme says
Lol, please show some causal connection between Christianity and the bad things you mention!
We should also complain about people who breathe air, because all terrorists breathe air, right?
It dumbfounds me that people do not understand this.
Lol, please show some causal connection between Christianity and the bad things you mention!
We should also complain about people who breathe air, because all terrorists breathe air, right?
73
RWSGFY
2018 Mar 21, 5:38pm
RWSGFY
2018 Mar 21, 5:38pm
HappyGilmore says
It's a non-answer. Why did they choose to start the study specifically after 9/11? What's so special about 09/12/2001 that made it a perferct day for the start of the study? It's not like info on terror acts prior to 09/12/2001 is unavailable or unreliable - I'd say we have a pretty good record of this kind of events in the West going at least a century back.
Satoshi_Nakamoto saysConvenient. Why 9/11 is excluded? Because it tips the scale in unwanted direction?
Because that's when they chose to start the study?
It's a non-answer. Why did they choose to start the study specifically after 9/11? What's so special about 09/12/2001 that made it a perferct day for the start of the study? It's not like info on terror acts prior to 09/12/2001 is unavailable or unreliable - I'd say we have a pretty good record of this kind of events in the West going at least a century back.
74
justme
2018 Mar 21, 5:38pm
justme
2018 Mar 21, 5:38pm
Patrick says
Try this logic on for size:
It is ok for white Christians to kill 2M Muslims, because we are not doing it because we are Christian, we are doing it because they are Muslim, and that is a bad and violent religion.
It is not ok for Arab Muslims to kill 3k (9/11) + 5k white Christians, because they are doing it motivated by being Muslim.
Do people see the problem in the above? In my logic, It is NOT ok to kill 2M humans because some religious relatives of these 2M humans killed 3k humans.
Lol, please show some causal connection between Christianity and the bad things you mention!
Try this logic on for size:
It is ok for white Christians to kill 2M Muslims, because we are not doing it because we are Christian, we are doing it because they are Muslim, and that is a bad and violent religion.
It is not ok for Arab Muslims to kill 3k (9/11) + 5k white Christians, because they are doing it motivated by being Muslim.
Do people see the problem in the above? In my logic, It is NOT ok to kill 2M humans because some religious relatives of these 2M humans killed 3k humans.
75
Shaman
2018 Mar 21, 5:50pm
Shaman
2018 Mar 21, 5:50pm
HappyGilmore says
I know Leftists are horrid at logic, but this is just pathetic!
Let me break this into tiny bites so even a Leftist can (possibly) Understand it. A caveman does have more of a chance, but here we go anyway.
You’re not a criminal until you’ve BROKEN a law! After that, we don’t need more laws to prosecute you, what we need is law ENFORCEMENT!
criminals don't follow laws, so why make more of them"
That is basically arguing for zero laws. Rapists don't follow laws, so why make it illegal?
I know Leftists are horrid at logic, but this is just pathetic!
Let me break this into tiny bites so even a Leftist can (possibly) Understand it. A caveman does have more of a chance, but here we go anyway.
You’re not a criminal until you’ve BROKEN a law! After that, we don’t need more laws to prosecute you, what we need is law ENFORCEMENT!
76
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 6:00pm
Patrick
2018 Mar 21, 6:00pm
False analogy!
The war in Iraq was because of George W Fucking Bush, a super friend of the most violent extremist Muslims, the Saudis.
Please show some causation due to Christianity.
The war in Iraq was because of George W Fucking Bush, a super friend of the most violent extremist Muslims, the Saudis.
Please show some causation due to Christianity.
77
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:04pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:04pm
HappyGilmore says
So we have legal recourse when someone breaks them.
lol--Is someone going to tell me why we have any laws on the books at all??
So we have legal recourse when someone breaks them.
78
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:06pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:06pm
justme says
Yup thats why voting for D's and R's is a terrible idea. I'm glad you are on the Trump train. #maga
Indeed, there is a group of predominantly white and so-called Christian men in Washington that are responsible for killing large number of Muslims, and by a huge factor, maybe 400X if you look at 5k dead US soldiers and 2M dead in the Middle East wars. Not to speak of completely demolishing entire cities in order to rid them of terrorists that the US Government pretty much enabled or created with previous and ongoing evil and stupid actions.
Yup thats why voting for D's and R's is a terrible idea. I'm glad you are on the Trump train. #maga
79
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:08pm
CBOEtrader
2018 Mar 21, 6:08pm
justme says
According to the OP, the thread is about calling this guy a WHITE TERRORIST. Dont expect anyone to read your mind or follow your "dog whistle" if it isnt explained in clear language.
What this thread is about
According to the OP, the thread is about calling this guy a WHITE TERRORIST. Dont expect anyone to read your mind or follow your "dog whistle" if it isnt explained in clear language.
80
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 6:16pm
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 6:16pm
HappyGilmore says
Still waiting for HG to tell us what NEW laws would prevent these mass shootings and terror bombings.
Coming soon?
Still waiting for Two Scoops source on DNC or media calling him a White Terrorist.
Coming soon?
Still waiting for HG to tell us what NEW laws would prevent these mass shootings and terror bombings.
Coming soon?
81
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 6:18pm
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 6:18pm
Quigley says
It's so pathetic, it almost borders on trolling.
HappyGilmore sayscriminals don't follow laws, so why make more of them"
That is basically arguing for zero laws. Rapists don't follow laws, so why make it illegal?
I know Leftists are horrid at logic, but this is just pathetic!
It's so pathetic, it almost borders on trolling.
82
mell
2018 Mar 21, 6:21pm
justme says
That's bs cause we didn't kill them, this has been a constant war zone. If the US pulled out and let Israel do whatever they wanted they'd already have annexed most if not all of middle east. But if this is what you want/prefer (Israeli dominance) instead if the status quo then you do actually have a point.
Patrick saysLol, please show some causal connection between Christianity and the bad things you mention!
Try this logic on for size:
It is ok for white Christians to kill 2M Muslims, because we are not doing it because we are Christian, we are doing it because they are Muslim, and that is a bad and violent religion.
It is not ok for Arab Muslims to kill 3k (9/11) + 5k white Christians, because they are doing it motivated by being Muslim.
Do people see the problem in the above? In my logic, It is NOT ok to kill 2M humans because some religious relatives of these 2M humans killed 3k humans.
That's bs cause we didn't kill them, this has been a constant war zone. If the US pulled out and let Israel do whatever they wanted they'd already have annexed most if not all of middle east. But if this is what you want/prefer (Israeli dominance) instead if the status quo then you do actually have a point.
83
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 7:51pm
CBOEtrader says
Yes, and that legal recourse is designed to be a deterrent. To create consequences severe enough to prevent people from performing actions that society deems to be bad.
Laws are created to influence behavior.
HappyGilmore sayslol--Is someone going to tell me why we have any laws on the books at all??
So we have legal recourse when someone breaks them.
Yes, and that legal recourse is designed to be a deterrent. To create consequences severe enough to prevent people from performing actions that society deems to be bad.
Laws are created to influence behavior.
84
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 21, 7:53pm
Quigley says
Another post that seems to violate the rules. Quigley--you seem to be having a hard time today.
But, my logic is impeccable. Laws are designed to influence behavior by punishing those that violate them.
know Leftists are horrid at logic, but this is just pathetic!
Let me break this into tiny bites so even a Leftist can (possibly) Understand it. A caveman does have more of a chance, but here we go anyway.
You’re not a criminal until you’ve BROKEN a law! After that, we don’t need more laws to prosecute you, what we need is law ENFORCEMENT!
Another post that seems to violate the rules. Quigley--you seem to be having a hard time today.
But, my logic is impeccable. Laws are designed to influence behavior by punishing those that violate them.
85
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 8:08pm
MrMagic
2018 Mar 21, 8:08pm
HappyGilmore says
OK, we're finally making some progress.
Apparently the current laws stating it's illegal to shoot and kill someone aren't working, according to the Liberals. Since all you've been saying is that we need "common sense gun laws", please state specifically what they would be, and what ones the criminals WILL obey?
Is that a hard question to answer? You seem to have no problem spewing the "common sense" narrative, now please post the answer to my question. I've asked it from you multiple times.
HappyGilmore says
Then it should be extremely easy to provide the answer I've requested, right?
CBOEtrader saysHappyGilmore sayslol--Is someone going to tell me why we have any laws on the books at all??
So we have legal recourse when someone breaks them.
Yes, and that legal recourse is designed to be a deterrent. To create consequences severe enough to prevent people from performing actions that society deems to be bad.
Laws are created to influence behavior.
OK, we're finally making some progress.
Apparently the current laws stating it's illegal to shoot and kill someone aren't working, according to the Liberals. Since all you've been saying is that we need "common sense gun laws", please state specifically what they would be, and what ones the criminals WILL obey?
Is that a hard question to answer? You seem to have no problem spewing the "common sense" narrative, now please post the answer to my question. I've asked it from you multiple times.
HappyGilmore says
But, my logic is impeccable. Laws are designed to influence behavior by punishing those that violate them.
Then it should be extremely easy to provide the answer I've requested, right?
86
FortWayne
2018 Mar 21, 8:27pm
FortWayne
2018 Mar 21, 8:27pm
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.
87
WatermelonUniversity
2018 Mar 21, 9:21pm
WatermelonUniversity
2018 Mar 21, 9:21pm
it's obvious why niggers can't be "serial" anything because their dumbass usually get caught the first time.
ever worked in the same building with a nigger? pay attention and you'll hear them make "primate" noises occasionally. sounds like the noises monkey make when they get excited.
too bad crops couldn't be grown in Africa so most was left untouched - hence today's negro overgrown problem.
www.youtube.com/embed/b6m-XlOxjbk
ever worked in the same building with a nigger? pay attention and you'll hear them make "primate" noises occasionally. sounds like the noises monkey make when they get excited.
too bad crops couldn't be grown in Africa so most was left untouched - hence today's negro overgrown problem.
www.youtube.com/embed/b6m-XlOxjbk
89
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 22, 4:59am
Sniper says
Liberals aren't saying that. That's the NRA nuts. They're the ones saying criminals don't follow laws, so why have them.
Apparently the current laws stating it's illegal to shoot and kill someone aren't working, according to the Liberals. Since all you've been saying is that we need "common sense gun laws", please state specifically what they would be, and what ones the criminals WILL obey?
Liberals aren't saying that. That's the NRA nuts. They're the ones saying criminals don't follow laws, so why have them.
90
anonymous
2018 Mar 22, 5:46am
FortWayne says
Sounds like NRA propaganda to sell more guns
I’m glad that I’m immune, consuming and propagating such nonsense reflects poorly on those who aren’t
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.
Sounds like NRA propaganda to sell more guns
I’m glad that I’m immune, consuming and propagating such nonsense reflects poorly on those who aren’t
91
HappyGilmore
2018 Mar 22, 11:12am
TwoScoopsPlissken says
Did you find any DNC/Media sources yet calling it "White Terror"?
I'm really anxious for you to produce the DNC lines. Those should be easy to find, right?
If this is the deceased suspect, it's a refutation of the Media/DNC (but I repeat myself) line about it being "White Terror"
Did you find any DNC/Media sources yet calling it "White Terror"?
I'm really anxious for you to produce the DNC lines. Those should be easy to find, right?
« First « Previous Comments 52 - 91 of 102 Next » Last » Search these comments
I think it is time to resurrect an old term that originated during the French Revolution, and has since been reused several times through the centuries:
WHITE TERROR
So from now one, if there is an act that could be viewed as possible terrorism, the public should always ask: Is it terrorism? Is it WHITE TERROR? Then the public should relentlessly hound rightist politicians and blog jockeys why why WHY have they not denounced the violence as a cowardly act of terrorism. That would only be fair, given that the rightists always want to brand violence by Muslim or brown people as terrorism, while ignoring the same acts if perpetrated by a white person.