« First « Previous Comments 103 - 142 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
See---this is undoubtedly the most frustrating part of posting here. This poster has asked this question multiple times before and it's been answered for him multiple times before.
He lets a month or two go by, and then asks it again, pretending that it hasn't been answered for him multiple times before.
Nope, it's never been answered.
You don't remember the Dem platform being cut and pasted on here for you? And linked to it? Really?
Meanwhile, we have posters who say the Economy sucks, because one number isn't improving as rapidly this quarter, but every single other metric from unemployment to youth unemployment to GDP growth to retail sales has been doing fantastic
Federal Deficit was increasing under Obama and has been going up for most of the past 35-40 years, that's no change
Womp, womp. Deficit was reduced by 1/3 under Obama. Try again.
Unemployment rate has simply continued its decline that started under Obama.
GDP is actually slightly lower than under Obama. Obama had two quarters in a row of 5.1% and 4.9%. One quarter of 4.1% is nothing special.
The national debt almost DOUBLED under Obama from about $10T to $20T.
Unemployment has really done well under Trump. Obama's recovery was sluggish, it should have been roaring back by 2011.
GDP "Growth" coming out of a horrific recession of "Negative Growth" isn't the same as a sustained boom. Like I said, the hallmark of the Obama "recovery" was how slow and weak it was. Even in 2010, Obama lost millions of jobs.
Read the quote again. Deficit and Debt are NOT the same thing.
Obama reduced the deficit. Trump is ballooning it out of control.
Womp, womp, again. Those growth rates were in 2014.
Obama increased the debt, however. It is not "Ballooning" out of control under Trump.
Obama's first budget has a $1.3T deficit. T for Trillion.
It was the Republicans, not Obama, that forced a sequestration in 2013 that ended up the first Obama era budget not topping a Trillion-dollar deficit
solely because the DNC went with Hillary.
Obama's deficits were front-loaded, so instead of the fact that he doubled the debt, we hear partisans claim that he reduced the deficit.
Are you kidding me? Obama inherited the worst economy since the Great Depression. Trump was given a booming economy.
but Democrats demand spreading Islam and "can't wait" to see more of it in Congress.
See this is a good example of a strawman argument.
Nobody, not even CNN - is making the case that Trump is doing a banging job on the economy.
Real Wages have stunk for most of the past few decades and won't be fixed in a day. It will be fixed by cutting off the nearly unlimited labor supply for big companies.
Not at all. my whole life, Democrat Activists have whinged about religion in politics, Jesus/God in the Public Forum, Separation of Church and State etc. etc.
Now that there are two conservative Muslim candidates, the Democrats are dancing around about how wonderful it is to have religious people running for office.
Fix it? All he's done has made it worse.
OK--please share any example of a Dem demanding that Islam be spread.
Look at your own chart and explain 2013 and 2014, those boom years of Obama. Way after the trough of a recession, when wages should be booming.
Not what I said. I said that before, they "worried" about religion in politics. Now, they are celebrating that conservative Muslims are running for office as Dems.
Even if they married for visas.
So please show me how it's not a strawman.
Do you think that is the same as saying "Dems demanding Islam be spread"?
Do you think that is the same as saying "Dems demanding Islam be spread"?
I see it as a double standard: Christian Belief undesirable; Muslim Belief desirable.
I'm looking for something....
Speaking of replacing Americans at work, I notice that Obama had settled lots of Sunni "Refugees" in Twin Falls, Idaho. His big donor Chobani has a big Yogurt plant there.
Should help keep wages low for Obama's friends.
You Russian can keep om telling that. Traitor Trump is very near to impeachment
Dems are party of Bill of Rights and they believe in freedom of religion, so they applaud the underdog being elected.
Love how being tough on trade ended up with big concessions from Europe. Another thing the ever-wrong pundits were wrong about.
Let me correct that for you. Democrats are the party of cultural Marxism, which preaches that equality of OUTCOME is the greatest virtue, and anytime there is inequality then a crime has been committed by the strong against the weak.
With me so far?
Mueller's millions and months upon months have turned up bupkiss "collusion".
No, because that's BS. Dems want equal opportunities, not equal outcomes.
Trump is very near to impeachment
« First « Previous Comments 103 - 142 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yesterday former Bill Clinton advisor Dick Morris told radio host on New York's AM 970 that he believes the "blue wave" that Democrats are expecting to give them back the Senate and House will not materialize, and polling has backed him up.
Last week, CNN's mid term poll showed that Democrats only had a 3 point advantage, well within the margin of error, and considering that CNN is known for "oversampling" Democrats in its own polls, this is troubling for the DNC.
Additionally, a recent poll from Reuters (left leaning) has shown that Millennials are leaving the Democrat party in droves. Democrat membership in the 18-34 demographic (the bread and butter of the DNC) dropped 9% over the past 2 years, most of them becoming "independents".
"I think that [Democrats] see fool’s gold in these scandals," Morris said. "They’re putting everything behind the Stormy Daniels scandal and Michael Cohen … and the country doesn’t give a damn."
That's when Morris dropped his prediction.
"There is no blue wave coming," Morris exclaimed. "There is a red wave. And what makes it red is the blood of the Democratic Party."
Here's my official take. I believe the GOP will LOSE seats in the house but will not give it up to the DNC. I believe the GOP will GAIN seats in the senate, keeping their majority. This will mean that Trump will have both houses of congress for his entire term.