patrick.net

I noticed that she referred to pedophilia as a sexual orientation. Sound familiar? Well it should since many states including California have laws that forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation. The first legal case challenging Megan’s Law will doubtless be filed soon, asserting that it unfairly discriminates against people with the pedo orientation.
From there we can expect cakes, photography, marriages?(Islam?) and who knows what other perversions including “clubs” where such tastes are freely indulged.

As we saw with the gays and the trannies, this ALWAYS comes down to a legal fight.

epitaph says

think that being a pedophile is acceptable.

She's walking a fine line here. The thesis is that it's okay to be a pedophile as long as you don't act on it. She's clearly not supporting child abuse.

Paraphrase: "Living out this sexual orientation will end in disaster. How can we help him not to live out his sexual urges." "One of the strongest predictors of child sexual abuse by pedophiles is social isolation."

So by allowing people to come out as pedophiles, they can be supported to not act on their urges, including medication. As a dad, I find the idea of giving any measure of acceptance to pedophiles unpalatable, but if she's right and we can reducing child abuse, it's worth considering.

HowdyThere says

come out as pedophiles

To paraphrase Alice Roosevelt Longworth: "If you're attracted to children, why come right over and live by me!"

HowdyThere says

epitaph says

think that being a pedophile is acceptable.

She's walking a fine line here. The thesis is that it's okay to be a pedophile as long as you don't act on it. She's clearly not supporting child abuse.

Paraphrase: "Living out this sexual orientation will end in disaster. How can we help him not to live out his sexual urges." "One of the strongest predictors of child sexual abuse by pedophiles is social isolation."

So by allowing people to come out as pedophiles, they can be supported to not act on their urges, including medication. As a dad, I find the idea of giving any measure of acceptance to pedophiles unpalatable, but if she's right and we can reducing child abuse, it's worth considering.

You mean like pressure and teachings via religion, which people on the left despise?

This is truly an ironic full circle.

This is disgusting . One concern I have is when they classify someone who is 17 and 11 months as a child. In some states, if two underage kids have sex , they can charge one with statutory rape-guess which gender they choose. There should be some age gap after puberty-a 40 or 50 year old going after a 15 yr old-throw him in jail. But 19 to 25 with 17 should not be held to the same standard.

Pre puberty-absolute No NO. The deep state justw ants to throw everyone in jail -more sheep for their prison industrial complexes.

Patrick says

Actually, there is pretty good evidence that being gay is in fact a choice.

For example, identical twins are not identically gay or straight. So being gay is clearly not a simple function of genes.

Also, boys raised in areas where gayness is normalized or even praised are more likely to be gay.

Similarly, I suspect that the current fad of declaring one's self transsexual is simply a desire to be different or "special" to gain attention and a certain kind of status.

I don't know if it is a choice or not and if it is-as longa s they are adults not our concern. However I do wonder if the rise of feminazism and the metoo type movement, 50% divorce rates, unfair alimony, massive child support all cause men to turn off women completely?

CovfefeButDeadly says

You mean like pressure and teachings via religion, which people on the left despise?

This is truly an ironic full circle.

The irony is, the actual trend is going in precisely the opposite direction from what the comments in this thread would mislead people to believe. Pedophilia used to be terribly common, especially among the "celibate" priesthood. The Vatican enabled it by moving pedo priests from one parish to another when families complained. Then, to avoid accountability, the Vatican had some archdioceses declare bankruptcy. The "celibate" priest pedophilia involved many thousands of cases worldwide including widely documented and reported examples in the USA, Ireland, and Chile among others: different continents, different languages, always the same doctrine producing the same pattern. As Islam produces suicide terrorism, Catholicism's "celibate" priesthood produces pedophilia.

If they can declare it a sexual orientation, these pervs will have rights to screw children.

Just like Rome... first they made gay shit ok, next they rented boys for sick pleasure... next society collapsed because it was shit place to form a family that would care about society’s future.

Patrick says

there is pretty good evidence that being gay is in fact a choice.

This is off topic because most pedophiles are adults who call themselves "straight" and prey on children of the opposite sex. In contrast, gay couples are of the same sex and usually around the same age.

Also, you insist on asserting a falsehood because you cannot find proof (to your satisfaction) that it is false. You can delete this comment as personal if you want, but I would simply cite your own comments. You have posted repeatedly your opinion based on your own experience that male interest in female "T&A" is "hard wired." You realize, I assume, that neither of those is actually a reproductive organ? That is, you can't actually reproduce by 'fertilizing' T&A. Nevertheless, you call that interest "hard wired" as if it were universal. At what point did you "choose" to have an interest in those targets? At what point did you "choose" to want them? I won't ask what you do, actually, but your stated interest would draw you to non-reproductive parts of a person with whom you could probably reproduce if she guides you to the right target. Were you perhaps 12 or 15 when you "chose" to become "wired" to want T&A as opposed to C&B? At some level, either you know that you didn't really "choose" what to be interested in, or you did in fact choose T&A over C&B despite actually preferring the latter. There is no other honest explanation for your stated opinion on this topic.

You might try reading more widely, or asking people more widely IRL. Different people want different things. They do not choose what to want. They may choose what to say and do, but not what to want. Life would be considerably simpler if people could choose what to want, because then they would choose to want things that make their lives easier.

Instead, as the OP example shows, people want what they want even if it makes their own lives very difficult. Then, the male pedophiles tend to join the priesthood, to distract from their lack of adult relationships.

CovfefeButDeadly says

You mean like pressure and teachings via religion, which people on the left despise?

I'm not sure that the condemnation of some religious groups would be beneficial, nor the support outlined in post 18.

Also, I'm pretty sure that there are democrats that go to church and don't despise religion.