LA Times Refuses To Participate In Boston Globe's "Groupthink" War On Trump
invite response
2018 Aug 16, 11:42am 2,651 views 8 comments
Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Search these comments
1
RC2006
2018 Aug 16, 5:35pm
RC2006
2018 Aug 16, 5:35pm
Wasn't the LA Times the only paper to put Trump ahead of Clinton in the polls?
2
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2018 Aug 16, 5:44pm
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2018 Aug 16, 5:44pm
How are these idiots continuing to deny their total lack of objectivity?
3
Automan Empire
2018 Aug 16, 9:40pm
Automan Empire
2018 Aug 16, 9:40pm
Comparing this to the Sinclair broadcast is disingenuous as fuck, and you probably know it.
The Sinclair editorial was written by one source and repeated verbatim by all of the stations in a top-down effort. There are videos on youtube, playing several of the broadcasts from different cities in unison.
The editors of 400 papers apparently generally agreed to run critical editorials, then each went and wrote their own editorials in a bottom-up effort.
Huge difference.
The Sinclair editorial was written by one source and repeated verbatim by all of the stations in a top-down effort. There are videos on youtube, playing several of the broadcasts from different cities in unison.
The editors of 400 papers apparently generally agreed to run critical editorials, then each went and wrote their own editorials in a bottom-up effort.
Huge difference.
4
MrMagic
2018 Aug 16, 9:54pm
MrMagic
2018 Aug 16, 9:54pm
Automan Empire says
Sure thing..
We'll just ignore the FACT that they all got their "talking points" emailed from the Boston Globe..
Liberal Logic..
It's a good thing those 400 are all "independent" and Free thinkers, right?
The editors of 400 papers apparently generally agreed to run critical editorials, then each went and wrote their own editorials in a bottom-up effort.
Sure thing..
We'll just ignore the FACT that they all got their "talking points" emailed from the Boston Globe..
Liberal Logic..
It's a good thing those 400 are all "independent" and Free thinkers, right?
7
Shaman
2018 Aug 17, 7:59am
Shaman
2018 Aug 17, 7:59am
Automan Empire says
Why would you think we would wish to defend Sinclair’s effort at propaganda?
Comparing this to the Sinclair broadcast is disingenuous as fuck, and you probably know it.
Why would you think we would wish to defend Sinclair’s effort at propaganda?
8
RC2006
2018 Aug 17, 10:13am
RC2006
2018 Aug 17, 10:13am
Quigley says
Both are just as bad, probably a lot of the same billionaires money.
Automan Empire saysComparing this to the Sinclair broadcast is disingenuous as fuck, and you probably know it.
Why would you think we would wish to defend Sinclair’s effort at propaganda?
Both are just as bad, probably a lot of the same billionaires money.
The Los Angeles times has refused to participate in the Boston Globe's coordinated 'call to action' in which they have colluded with over 400 newspapers to publish anti-Trump editorials.
As Twitter user @KidBrightwillow notes, when the pro-Trump Sinclair Broadcast group coordinated a right-leaning message that anchors across the country read, the same papers now colluding with the Globe cried foul.
(aaahhh yes, the hypocritical Liberals)..
When else has the Boston Globe colluded with against Trump? Oh right, Hillary Clinton's campaign!
Boston Globe colludes with Clinton campaign to give Hillary a "big presence". https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4180 …
Oh Crap, there's that Hillary and Collusion FACTS showing up again...
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-16/la-times-refuses-participate-boston-globes-groupthink-war-trump