patrick.net

DASKAA says

Highly idiotic. People fucking died by doing this.

True. But the ones who died were going well north of 50 mph. He's crawling along the 405 at 5mph when he does this. Trust me, no one is going to die here.

Evan F. says

He's crawling along the 405 at 5mph

Yes, like I said, everyone needs the acceleration of a model 3 for that situation.
Evan F. says

I'm sure the owner of a LaFerrari is delighted to idle their day away on the 405. What's your point?

I seriously doubt that. I think YOUR point is a little bit dull.

Only in California do people buy expensive sports cars only to idle along at 5 mph.... Must be something to do with that "small penis syndrome".

MrMagic says

Only in California do people buy expensive sports cars only to idle along at 5 mph.... Must be something to do with that "small penis syndrome".

Sure, cities like NYC, Shanghai, Hong Kong, London etc. have completely nonexistent traffic and a shocking dearth of wealthy people. And the ones who are wealthy drive nothing but Yugos.

My amazingly dull point is only in response to yours (which is also dull).

How Desperate Is Elon?

Elon can’t sell his cars – so he is suing to make people buy them...

Or at least, suing to compel the government to keep on paying people to buy them – if that distinction amounts to any meaningful difference.

When the subsidies dried up in Denmark, so did Tesla’s sales – by 94 percent. That’s not a typo. With the subsidy in place, 2,738 Teslas were sold in 2015. With the subsidies gone, 176 Teslas were sold the following year.

These purchaser subsidies amounted to several thousand dollars each, and worth a lot more to Tesla, et al, since without them the incentive to buy an electric car dims considerably.



Elon has admitted openly that he can’t do “business” without these subsidies: “Clean energy vehicles” – as he styles them – “aren’t attractive enough to compete without some form of taxpayer-backed subsidy.”

In any event, when the government of Ontario, Canada announced this week that it planned to eliminate the subsidies for EVs – at least, those which pay people with other people’s money to buy Teslas – Elon and his lawyers ran to the courts for succor. Time to call Saul!

“The decision has already inflicted substantial harm on Tesla Canada in the form of lost sales,” the brief contends.

Or rather, why subsidize?



He has singlehandedly perverted the market for electric cars – which aren’t an intrinsically stupid idea – by stupidly building them to be high-performance and luxurious, which has made them much too expensive to be anything other than low-volume indulgences for the virtue-signaling affluent.

But subsidizing high-performing/high-cost electric cars for virtue-signaling affluent people who ought to be buying their own cars is a species of obnoxiousness akin to rent-controlled luxury apartments in Manhattan.



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-18/how-desperate-elon

Evan F. says

DASKAA says

Highly idiotic. People fucking died by doing this.

True. But the ones who died were going well north of 50 mph. He's crawling along the 405 at 5mph when he does this. Trust me, no one is going to die here.

You don't need to buy a Tesla to have adaptive cruise control allowing to crawl along in 5mph traffic - many other makes already offer this feature.

MrBark says

Who paid in-full for a vehicle that they did not receive? Name one person.

According to Tesla's site, anyone who put a deposit down in the last month.

Strategist says

No such company in America.

See above about paying and not receiving. As to government subsidies:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html

Yes it's old, but just pulled the first one from the list.

Strategist says

Musk deserves another $10 billion in subsidies.

Since you're in the giving mood about throwing just one billion my way? You know, because giving people money is always a sure sign they're successful.

Evan F. says

Lol where the hell are you getting this? Pretty much everyone who buys a Model S is someone who acknowledges that climate change is real, and they're willing to pay a premium to do something about it, in addition to feeling smug about it.

MrBark says

I'm never going back to daily driving a gas car.

Hate to burst your bubble on this but:

clambo says

The car subsidy is going down in 2019

Electric rates are also going up for many folks unless they can shift their demand to off peak times. This is tricky, as it also represents an opportunity for the PowerWall product.
Starting in 2019, time-of-use rates (TOU) will become mandatory for all San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) customers. These new TOU rates will be less favorable to solar customers than current TOU rates, due to peak pricing periods later in the day.
PG&E is currently experimenting with TOU rate schedules and will be rolling them out for all customers in the 2020 time frame.

Evan F. says

As others have said here, a Model 3 is most comparable to a BMW 3 series or Audi A4. If you grenade a motor on one of those cars, you are most definitely looking at repairs in the 10k region. And both of those cars only carry warranties of 4yrs/50k miles.

Pretty much the only way to grenade a modern engine is to leave the oil drain open. Since leaded gas (highly oil contaminating and corrosive) went out 250-300k is the norm for any engine that has regular oil changes. My sjuburban is at 370k and going just fine.

bob2356 says

Pretty much the only way to grenade a modern engine is to leave the oil drain open.

Pretty much. But with BMW M3 there is also the famous "money shift". ;)

AntiOcasioCortez says

What subsidies?

Massive tax breaks and deferrals. It's not 'subsidies' in name, but it's corporate welfare all the same.

DASKAA says

MrMagic says

Why do they have production defects if they just left the factory??? Hmmmm...

Pretty common practice at other automakers. GM specifically.

Really???

Common???

86% Of Model 3s Produced to Meet Tesla's 5,000/Week Goal Needed Rework

Internal documents revealed by Business insider disclose that Tesla had to re-work over 4,300 of the much discussed 5,000 Model 3 vehicles it built in June, and later touted as a production target milestone.

The same report also gives those closely following the Tesla saga additional color what the term "factory gated" could mean. One would guess that Musk can't put most of these 5,000 vehicles - about 20% of which were built in Tesla's GA4 assembly tent - on the road, when more than 86% of them need to be reworked. Internal documents revealed that these reworks came during the week of June 23 and that each one took about 37 minutes to complete.

As a result, instead of 5,000 new vehicles out on the streets, most were likely "factory gated". In other words, they needed to be fixed.

What is also troubling is that the company's "first pass yield", or the number of vehicles that made their way through the manufacturing process without needing rework, was anemic.

The normal range for the auto industry is between 65% and 80%, according to experts cited in the BI article. Using the numbers provided, Tesla's first pass yield was less than 14%.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-21/86-model-3s-produced-meet-teslas-5000week-goal-needed-rework

But, but, but... you save so much money on gas when you pay DOUBLE for such a nice, quality vehicle. Oh, and that acceleration....

LOL

MrMagic says

DASKAA says

MrMagic says

Why do they have production defects if they just left the factory??? Hmmmm...

Pretty common practice at other automakers. GM specifically.

Really???

Common???

Yep. Really-really. Talk to anyone who worked at GM plants and they will tell you the stories of fixing cars on the lots after they exit the assembly line. Now, Toyota, Honda and such don't do this, because they prefer to stop the line and fix the issue right there, production numbers be damned.

DASKAA says

Talk to anyone who worked at GM plants and they will tell you the stories of fixing cars on the lots after they exit the assembly line.

Nobody said it NEVER happens at other manufactures.... but..

MrMagic says

The normal range for the auto industry is between 65% and 80%, according to experts cited in the BI article. Using the numbers provided, Tesla's first pass yield was less than 14%.

So, normally 65% - 80% come off the line fine, on average, but Tesla's only have less than 14% that come of the line fine.

That's not an issue??

MrMagic says

DASKAA says

Talk to anyone who worked at GM plants and they will tell you the stories of fixing cars on the lots after they exit the assembly line.

Nobody said it NEVER happens at other manufactures.... but..

MrMagic says

The normal range for the auto industry is between 65% and 80%, according to experts cited in the BI article. Using the numbers provided, Tesla's first pass yield was less than 14%.

So, normally 65% - 80% come off the line fine, on average, but Tesla's only have less than 14% that come of the line fine.

That's not an issue??

We could compare these numbers with the numbers for other automakers in early stages of producing completely new model on a brand-new assembly line. If we had them. As it stands now we have no base to compare. It could be normal or it could be highly anomalous. If you have said numbers for other manufacturers in similar stage of production, do share.

DASKAA says

We could compare these numbers with the numbers for other automakers in early stages of producing completely new model on a brand-new assembly line. I

Existing car companies are producing new models all the time and the overall number is 65-80%. Automakers have been at this a long time and know where the pitfalls are.

bob2356 says

Existing car companies are producing new models all the time and the overall number is 65-80%

The overall number across the industry is as informative as average body temperature across a county. Do we have the number (specifically) for the first several months of (specifically) brand-new model on a (specifically) brand-new assembly line?

DASKAA says

Do we have the number (specifically) for the first several months of (specifically) brand-new model on a (specifically) brand-new assembly line?

Google.com maybe?

MrMagic says

DASKAA says

Do we have the number (specifically) for the first several months of (specifically) brand-new model on a (specifically) brand-new assembly line?

Google.com maybe?

Maybe.

MrMagic says

Oh, and that acceleration....

Is there a comparable gas car that you can bang a rin-style hooker on the way to dinner?

I'd pay like 30% more for a Ford Raptor that drove itself

NuttBoxer says

Strategist says

Musk deserves another $10 billion in subsidies.

Since you're in the giving mood about throwing just one billion my way? You know, because giving people money is always a sure sign they're successful.

Sure, not a problem. I have lots of $billions to give away.

DASKAA says

Yep. Really-really. Talk to anyone who worked at GM plants and they will tell you the stories of fixing cars on the lots after they exit the assembly line. Now, Toyota, Honda and such don't do this, because they prefer to stop the line and fix the issue right there, production numbers be damned.

Back in 2005 when my kids were still young, we needed to replace a Mini van. We liked the Toyota Sienna, but decided to check out the Dodge Caravan anyway. We get in the car, and the thing won't start. LOL. They called the battery guy, who came running to give us a jump. On the test drive, the van was rickety and made too much noise.
We ended up with the Sienna even though it cost a lot more. Never had regrets.
Rotten car companies. Rotten Detroit workers. Cheap quality. That's what American car companies usually are. No wonder they always need a taxpayer bailout. The electric cars made by American companies seem pretty good, but I still don't trust them. I trust Tesla only.

CBOEtrader says

Is there a comparable gas car that you can bang a rin-style hooker on the way to dinner?

I'd pay like 30% more for a Ford Raptor that drove itself

A Limo should do it. More leg room when she spreads them or goes on her knees.

Strategist says

Back in 2005 when my kids were still young, we needed to replace a Mini van.

Too bad this was not around "back in the day". Looks like you can get 33 miles all on electricity.
We opted for the 2018 Limited Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid model, and after all was said and done, it came to $43K. We got the full $7,500 federal tax credit and the $500 rebate from the state of Connecticut, bringing the cost to $35K... Our 10- and 13-year-old kids helped us out and did the math, concluding that we can get two Chevy Bolts and one Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid for the cost of one Tesla X.

MrMagic says

I'm sure that acceleration really comes in handy when sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on a CA Freeway.

So the only time Tesla owners drive is during the busiest times and only on the freeway? And they never get to use that acceleration?

Like I said, I dislike Musk and won't be buying an EV vehicle anytime soon unless they can start getting 400 miles/charge consistently and can charge in the same time it takes to fuel up. That said, it's a nice car. Saying otherwise makes it apparent one hasn't driven one. Someone can have an opinion about a product, but if someone hasn't used said product, or experienced it, their opinion is kind of trash.

WookieMan says

MrMagic says

I'm sure that acceleration really comes in handy when sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on a CA Freeway.

So the only time Tesla owners drive is during the busiest times and only on the freeway? And they never get to use that acceleration?

Teslas are eligible for HOV stickers. So they can use that acceleration while flying past bumper-to-bumper traffic on a CA freeway. And pay 1/2 of the bridge toll.

WookieMan says

So the only time Tesla owners drive is during the busiest times and only on the freeway? And they never get to use that acceleration?

That's true, I'm sure they get to use all that acceleration as they race through downtown LA, right?

Oh, wait...

WookieMan says

That said, it's a nice car.

How do you know if you don't own one?

WookieMan says

Someone can have an opinion about a product, but if someone hasn't used said product, or experienced it, their opinion is kind of trash.

Just like you posted above?

Preston Tucker. Except Tucker could deliver.

MrMagic says

WookieMan says

That said, it's a nice car.

How do you know if you don't own one?

What are you talking about? Never said I owned one. I have ACTUALLY driven one. Multiple times. Enough to know it's a nice car. Have you driven one? Yes or no? If not, your opinion is as bad as the Musk fan boys that tout the car and have NEVER driven it.

Like I said, I have ZERO intention of buying one in the near future. I like my gassers. I also know when I encounter a good product. I'm more frugal and will wait for prices to come down. I'm not going to burn the product down without ever having used it. I guess people like to do that nowadays.

WookieMan says

I have ZERO intention of buying one in the near future. I like my gassers.

Me too.

Look at that, we agree on something, you can now relax.

MrMagic says

WookieMan says

I have ZERO intention of buying one in the near future. I like my gassers.

Me too.

Look at that, we agree on something, you can now relax.

We agree on more than you think. Don't fool yourself.

And don't worry, I'm 1,000% relaxed. I don't recall what you said you did, but if I bashed your company or product without having used it, you would take offense. This is undeniable. I'm not defending Musk, just the practice of humans trashing shit they've never used or experienced. Don't believe everything you read. I'm sure GM, Ford, Toyota, Nissan, etc are all on board with Tesla doing well. They would NEVER try to trash the competition. They want Tesla to take their market share and would love to write nice articles about them.

WookieMan says

I don't recall what you said you did, but if I bashed your company or product without having used it, you would take offense. This is undeniable. I'm not defending Musk, just the practice of humans trashing shit they've never used or experienced.

I've been bashing the company (you know, the title of this thread) and the snake oil salesman Musk, more than the car. I've only referenced certain points to push back against the Tesla fanboys here, who can't see reality because of their rose colored Tesla glasses. They're just as bad as the Apple fanboys..

For what it's worth, I worked for a start-up car company in the past (remember DeLorean), so I've seen these start-up quality issues before. With Tesla, it's way too early to see if these quality issues come back to bite them in the ass. My guess, the company won't be around to address them, and the Tesla fanboys will be left holding the bag.

MrMagic says

They're just as bad as the Apple fanboys.

Apple has solid products. This is undeniable. Call them fanboys or you can call them people that like good products.

MrMagic says

I've been bashing the company (you know, the title of this thread) and the snake oil salesman Musk, more than the car.

He's the CEO of a public company. WTF would you expect him to do? "Hey, you know what, 5 years down the road this might not work out." EVERY CEO is a snake oil salesman. Every single one. That's job number 1. There's not ONE company that has a 100% perfect and foolproof product. You have to sugarcoat the shit sometimes.

MrMagic says

For what it's worth, I worked for a start-up car company in the past (remember DeLorean), so I've seen these start-up quality issues before.

Yes, of course there will be startup quality issues. Somehow Ford is still around though. They started up and still make some pretty crappy cars 100 years later. We can't just slash and burn every new company that tries to build a car though. Especially one that will pave the future for others even if they don't stay around. EV's make a shitload more sense then gassers. Their time just hasn't come yet. Like I said, not a fan of Musk. His ego gets in his own way too much.

WookieMan says

Apple has solid products. This is undeniable.

Yep, that's why everyone needs to pay TWICE the amount for them so they can send email, watch cat video's and post on Patnet.

WookieMan says

Call them fanboys or you can call them people that like good products.

Or. call them fools for paying DOUBLE for the same product made by someone else to do the same thing...hmmm, like a Tesla...

WookieMan says

Yes, of course there will be startup quality issues

Yep, when less than 14% roll off the line with no quality issues (as reported), just a hickup... noting to see here... Please tell me where I can pay DOUBLE for one of these gems.

WookieMan says

EV's make a shitload more sense then gassers. Their time just hasn't come yet.

Hmmmm, then they DON'T make sense yet, NOW...

WookieMan says

Like I said, not a fan of Musk. His ego gets in his own way too much.

Look at that, we agree again... stop the clock....

MrMagic says

Yep, that's why everyone needs to pay TWICE the amount for them so they can send email, watch cat video's and post on Patnet.

Twice? That's a bit of a stretch. You do pay a premium for Apple products, sure, but not double. Galaxy S9 retails for like $700, iPhone X is $900-1000. And that's just in the handset space. For awhile the iMac 5k represented a BETTER value than any possible PC configuration, simply because it was impossible to get a standalone 5k monitor for less than like $1000.

Again, Apple's pricey. But on balance, not double.

Evan F. says

Twice? That's a bit of a stretch.

Nope, you're cherry picking, you need to look across the whole product line: phones, iPads, Laptops, iPods, and everything else Apple has made.


Evan F. says

But on balance, not double.

True, sometimes MORE than double.

WookieMan says

MrMagic says

WookieMan says

I have ZERO intention of buying one in the near future. I like my gassers.

Me too.

Look at that, we agree on something, you can now relax.

We agree on more than you think. Don't fool yourself.

And don't worry, I'm 1,000% relaxed. I don't recall what you said you did, but if I bashed your company or product without having used it, you would take offense. This is undeniable. I'm not defending Musk, just the practice of humans trashing shit they've never used or experienced. Don't believe everything you read. I'm sure GM, Ford, Toyota, Nissan, etc are all on board with Tesla doing well. They would NEVER try to trash the competition. They want Tesla to take their market share and would love to write nice articles about them.

It's not just the other car companies caught with their pants down that dislike Tesla. Big Oil hates Tesla even more. How would you feel if someone came along and completely destroyed your $trillions?
Elon Musk is a devil to oil companies, and a God to environmentalists.