Liberals: Give a multibillion dollar company billions to open a headquarters they are going to have to open anyway, YAY! Also Liberals: We can't sell billions in US Weapons to a US Ally, that's bad fiscal policy!
Trump said we'd put a tariff of 5% starting June 10th, if Mexico doesn't stop the hordes coming across our borders. Some say the US consumers pay this. Funny though, the Peso dropped about 3% in value today (it'll probably drop the other 2% by the 10th), so the prices the US pays will be about the same. It is the Mexican workers who get paid less via the depreciated Peso.
This has to be the lamest "Trump is Hitler" spot. What wall did Hitler build? Or are you confusing Hitler with East Germany? Or just cut and paste with no comprehension?
The truth is that Mueller knew and has made EXTREMELY clear, that the part of his investigation that pertains to Trump was about collecting evidence, not about making a judgement of probable guilt or an indictment, since a sitting President can not be indicted.
THerefore his collected evidence can be used OR NOT by congress for further investigations or to impeach Trump.
Mueller was given carte blanche to look into "Election Interference." with no limitations. He was never refused any request by Rosenstein, his boss. Every single request was honored.
So if he charged Manafort, Stone, Flynn, and quite a few Russians, why not charge - or recommend to Rosenstein/Barr OR Congress to charge/impeach - in his report if HE couldn't prosecute the President?
Because he has no case, that's why. This is not a man with a history of being shy of charging people, including wrongly as in the Whitey Bulger Associates or the falsely accused Anthrax mailer, Hillsong or whatever the name was. He didn't even feel obligated to make a statement when the man was officially exonerated by Obama's DOJ.
Again, Mueller neither charged nor recommended impeachment of Trump.
In conclusion, Mueller found insufficient evidence to even recommend charges.
Any other reading is pure political bias and excuse making.
Let's have Mueller testify before Congress about his Report.
That way they can get Blumpf Dumpf Trumpf!
Of course, there's a reason why the Dem Congress will never have Mueller testify under oath at a committee where Republicans could ask questions. Given that the Republicans have access to a lot of the same info Mueller has, and will be asking about Podesta, and Downer, and Strzok...
Remember, Mueller's mandate was Foreign Interference. Why didn't he act on that info, and if he did, what did he find out? And why wasn't it in his Report?
« First « Previous Comments 931 - 970 of 42,077 Next » Last » Search these comments
Also Liberals: We can't sell billions in US Weapons to a US Ally, that's bad fiscal policy!
I think it's Branco.
marcus says
True or False: Holder resigned to avoid impeachment, precisely over the ATF coverup.
Obamacare made Blue Cross management filthy rich.
What'd it do for the taxpayer?
Your sentiment is as stupid as it gets
His job is Prove there was a crime committed nothing else.
He's just a Sorry fucking Liberal like all of the other Useless Sons of Bitches of course he's going to suck balls at doing his job.
He had One Fucking Job, find the Crime Trump committed. He couldn't so he needs to shut his Dick Holster as Colbert would say.
That's Islamophobic.
"OMG we can't do nothing but manage the decline. What magic wand does he think he has, anyway? Never see 3% GDP growth again..."
This shows exactly why Obama was a shitty deal maker by the way. So thank you, you memed yourself.
LEFT can’t meme
FortWayneIndiana says
Again, you got no argument, so you blur the real difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL immigration.
It is like calling a shoplifter a customer.
This has to be the lamest "Trump is Hitler" spot. What wall did Hitler build? Or are you confusing Hitler with East Germany? Or just cut and paste with no comprehension?
RACIST!
ANOTHER self-own.
Legal Immigrants != Illegal Border Violators.
If it's so good why don't China, Germany, Japan, and South Korea embrace Free Trade?
Mueller was given carte blanche to look into "Election Interference." with no limitations. He was never refused any request by Rosenstein, his boss. Every single request was honored.
He charged Manafort, Stone, Flynn, and quite a few Russians. That's not my opinion, here's NBC reporting what Mueller's Prosecutors recommended to the Judge in the Manafort case:
https://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/mueller-prosecutors-recommend-19-24-years-in-manafort-case-1443587651579
So if he charged Manafort, Stone, Flynn, and quite a few Russians, why not charge - or recommend to Rosenstein/Barr OR Congress to charge/impeach - in his report if HE couldn't prosecute the President?
Because he has no case, that's why. This is not a man with a history of being shy of charging people, including wrongly as in the Whitey Bulger Associates or the falsely accused Anthrax mailer, Hillsong or whatever the name was. He didn't even feel obligated to make a statement when the man was officially exonerated by Obama's DOJ.
Again, Mueller neither charged nor recommended impeachment of Trump.
In conclusion, Mueller found insufficient evidence to even recommend charges.
Any other reading is pure political bias and excuse making.
This must be hollow even to you. That one idiot in Chancellorsville, condemned by conservatives, against all that Antifa violence?
Let's have Mueller testify before Congress about his Report.
That way they can get Blumpf Dumpf Trumpf!
Of course, there's a reason why the Dem Congress will never have Mueller testify under oath at a committee where Republicans could ask questions. Given that the Republicans have access to a lot of the same info Mueller has, and will be asking about Podesta, and Downer, and Strzok...
Remember, Mueller's mandate was Foreign Interference. Why didn't he act on that info, and if he did, what did he find out? And why wasn't it in his Report?
« First « Previous Comments 931 - 970 of 42,077 Next » Last » Search these comments