« First « Previous Comments 425 - 464 of 600 Next » Last » Search these comments
Once the rate gets to 5.5% then sellers should offer to buy up to 4 discount points to lower the buyer's mortgage rate to 4.5% considering all time high prices were around a rate of 3% in 2022. Buying 4 discount points costs 4% of the mortgage but it is like lowering the home price 10%.
That might be a good sales tactic, but are points ever a good idea?

Oakland, CA: -24%
Austin, TX: -24%
Cape Coral, FL: -19%
New Orleans, LA: -18%
San Francisco, CA: -16%
Birmingham, AL: -15%
Fort Myers, FL: -13%
Washington, DC: -12%
Sarasota, FL: -11%
Denver, CO: -10%
Portland, OR: -10%
Phoenix, AZ: -10%
Naples, FL: -10%
Hayward, CA: -10%
There are many other bigger cities where single-family home prices have declined but haven’t made the 10% cutoff, such as Los Angeles and San Diego (both -4% from the 2024 peak), San Antonio (-8%), Dallas (-6%), Fort Worth (-9%), San Jose (-5%), Atlanta (-5%), Memphis (-7%), Tampa (-6%), Seattle (-7%)…. Each monthly decline gets them closer to the double-digit zone.
In some other cities, prices of single-family homes have continued to rise or have flattened out.
Cape Coral is in free fall.
Cape Coral is in free fall.
MolotovCocktail
15m boomers houses last for 3 out of 10 years supply at best if all are in good shape. I am not sure that it can pull down prices significantly down given the inflation rate is always higher.

MolotovCocktail says
YEP!
Just like demographics of the burst of Boomers INTO the housing market drove up prices in the 70s, they had been fairly flat for the 15 years previous.

In the US about 12% of the population owns 2 or more properties. In China it is about 25% of the population. So, if we simply get to the level the Chinese are at today, that absorbs all the excess property coming from the Boomers.
You are being sarcastic, right?
As a side note, in China there are over 100 car companies building cars. The elites in the US would lose their SHIT if something like that was tried in the US even compensating for population.
There's plenty of the population to absorb the incoming properties if the elites allow it.
Been there, done that: the US used to have over 100 car companies at the dawn of the last century. But, unlike in China now, these weren't government-subsidized.
And Chinese real estate is a disaster right now
MolotovCocktail says
*************************************************************************************************
Yes, it is brand new and first listed in December 2024 for $416,500
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/3382-Wood-Stork-Drive-Sw-Wilmington-LOT-37-Ocean-Isle-Beach-NC-28469/443112242_zpid/
.
All it takes is a small change in perception to reignite housing sales.
In the US it is the opposite problem. Since 2022 the financial media has been promoting that now is a terrible time to buy a house. They use historical price to income ratios to belabor the point.
Since April 2022 (when the Housing Bubble 2.0 thread was started ) the stock market has increased in value by about 61% or about $25 trillion. We only have about 2 million houses for sale in the US. At an average price of $430k it puts the market value up for sale at about $86 billion.
All it takes is a small change in perception to reignite housing sales.
Generation Z has more financial wealth for their age than any generation that preceded it adjusted for inflation.
What planet do you live on?
The US has the highest percentage of college graduates with engineering and science degrees in the world clocking in at about 35%. They get high paying jobs. There's just not much of a news story there.
We hear about those with a disfunction.
« First « Previous Comments 425 - 464 of 600 Next » Last » Search these comments
So the only way to decrease real prices is to decrease demand, and the only way to do that is to kick out all illegal immigrants and anchor babies. Will Trump do this? Almost certainly not. Even with control over all three branches of the government, the Republicans are not going to get rid of all the illegals who are driving up housing prices and social welfare costs. I wish that I was wrong about this, but I'm not.
The United States population reached 200 million on November 20, 1967. If there was no net migration, then the U.S. population have stabilized to about 220 million. Instead, the population is 335 million. This is why housing is so expensive. This is why rent is so damn high. This is why the younger generations cannot afford to have children. This is why the only way to keep the population from falling is to import massive numbers of unskilled, uneducated, and often criminal immigrants. Both parties are responsible for this: democrats for importing voters and republicans for importing farm laborers. Both parties want cheap labor.
When you import massive numbers of low-iq, low-skill workers, your per capital GDP declines relative to where it would have been otherwise. Yes, technological advancements mask this because technology increases GDP faster than low-skill immigration decreases it, but most of those gains don't get seen by the middle class.
Since both parties, and their corporate overlords, are benefiting from the current system, immigration will continue and housing prices will also continue to rise. I suppose I shouldn't care since I own and have a 2.25% mortgage that is being eaten away by inflation, but anyone young enough that they having bought already is fucked.