7
0

EBT Restrictions on Pop


               
2025 Mar 27, 11:17am   3,108 views  103 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

It seems reasonable to me to disallow the purchase of pop, aka "soda", with EBT (food stamp) cards.

The point of those EBT cards is to get poor people some nutrition. Drinking sugar syrup is the opposite of getting nutrition.

I have a Chinese friend who bought stock in both Coca-Cola and dialysis centers. His reasoning is that he wins on both ends: Coca-Cola causes obesity and kidney disease, and then those poisoned people need dialysis later. Evil reasoning, but not incorrect.

There are many billions of dollars at stake here, all derived from poisoning the public via sugar-water purchased with public money.

So the companies making the poison have started paying off "influencers" on X etc to claim that it's a violation of "freedom" somehow to restrict EBT cards so that they can't buy that poison. It's kind of sad to see them sell out.

Unspoken is the fact that EBT already limits what food you can buy with public money. I think it has to at least have a nutrition label on it to be eligible.

I'd never tell people what they can't buy with their own money, but preventing people from using public money to give themselves diabetes seems fine to me.

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/fatsteria-best-big-soda-memes-beware-paid-influencers










« First        Comments 49 - 88 of 103       Last »     Search these comments

50   Misc   2025 Oct 29, 6:06pm  

Any bets on how long it will be before every retail store uses the Costco membership model of business. Require customers to pay a fee upfront for the privilege of shopping there and requiring identification before they can enter. Only way I see to cut down on retail crime.
51   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 Oct 29, 6:19pm  

Misc says


Any bets on how long it will be before every retail store uses the Costco membership model of business. Require customers to pay a fee upfront for the privilege of shopping there and requiring identification before they can enter. Only way I see to cut down on retail crime.

I think that's a CA thing.

We don't have any of that here in Florida. Not even in the big cities, other than the usual trying to grab a candy bar or 40 and run off with it from a convenience store type thing. But that doesn't usually go well for the perp with all the cameras.
52   Patrick   2025 Oct 29, 6:21pm  

Retail is being killed off by Amazon and other online shopping anyway, except for boutique places.

No retail theft if there is no retail. But then, people steal Amazon packages off your doorstep.
53   Ceffer   2025 Oct 29, 6:28pm  

That's why they call them Democrats.



57   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 30, 3:52am  

Patrick says


WallStreetApes

More Americans exposing the truth about the SNAP EBT Program
"The real reason why a lot of people are upset about this whole food
stamps snap benefit thing, bro, is because they're selling their food stamps.
They're selling them. I'm telling you, they are selling their food stamps. You
know how many people in New York and other states right now are going to
the corner store, the deli, and they're selling their food stamps"
"That's why they're getting like $4,000 - $3,000 in food stamps, and
they're selling it for cash. They'll get $4,000 in food stamps and they'll just
take like $1,000 in cash. Like bro, like that's happening like everywhere.
That's why they're mad."
"They will never admit to selling their food stamps. But it's happening."


I don’t see how this is possible. Each person only gets $190 per month in EBT.
59   zzyzzx   2025 Oct 30, 7:04am  

Glock-n-Load says

I don’t see how this is possible. Each person only gets $190 per month in EBT.

Source?

AI overview:
The amount of EBT (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - SNAP) benefits varies by household size, income, and expenses, with the average household receiving around $332 per month as of fiscal year 2023. For a family of three with no income, the maximum benefit could be $785 per month (fiscal year 2026 estimate), while a one-person household might receive a minimum of $23 per month, with the maximum for a single person being up to $298 (as of October 2025, in some areas).

8-person household: $1,789


But remember there can be multiple "families" living an a household whose combined EBT exceeds that.
61   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 30, 8:05pm  

zzyzzx says

Glock-n-Load says


I don’t see how this is possible. Each person only gets $190 per month in EBT.

Source?

AI overview:
The amount of EBT (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - SNAP) benefits varies by household size, income, and expenses, with the average household receiving around $332 per month as of fiscal year 2023. For a family of three with no income, the maximum benefit could be $785 per month (fiscal year 2026 estimate), while a one-person household might receive a minimum of $23 per month, with the maximum for a single person being up to $298 (as of October 2025, in some areas).

8-person household: $1,789


But remember there can be multiple "families" living an a household whose combined EBT exceeds that.

That’s a long way from $3,000-$4,000.
62   Misc   2025 Oct 31, 3:53am  

Glock-n-Load says

That’s a long way from $3,000-$4,000.


What ???? - You think they only sign up once ???
63   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 31, 6:45am  

Hmm, maybe there’s something to this new financial SNAP opportunity.
64   Patrick   2025 Oct 31, 1:17pm  

https://theamericansun.substack.com/p/testing-the-danegeld


Testing the Danegeld

Is it really keeping them pacified?

For the first time since the program’s modern form in 1964, we are about to discover whether the underclass can be pacified indefinitely with prepaid debit cards or whether the entire enterprise has been a sophisticated form of Danegeld, tribute paid to prevent the barbarians from storming the gates.

The analogy is thrown around on social media. The original Danegeld was silver extorted by Viking raiders from Anglo-Saxon kings too timid or too weakened to fight. Pay the danes, went the logic, and they will sail away. They never did. The tribute merely whetted appetite and advertised vulnerability. ...

The program’s defenders insist the comparison is grotesque. Hunger is not piracy. Malnutrition is not marauding. Yet the pacification theory does not require literal violence, only the credible threat of disorder. It’s the mob threat of nice rich playground you got here shame if we burned it down. When Mayor Eric Adams of New York warns that cutting SNAP will produce “looting in the streets,” he is not predicting famine but signaling the unspoken compact. Keep the EBT cards loaded, or the underclass (violent, resentful, and concentrated in vote-rich urban wards) will make life untenable and governance impossible. The threat is rarely articulated so baldly, but it hovers over every budget negotiation like the ghost of the ‘60s riots. ...

Why do they get to hold everyone else hostage? If ruralites are told to go to the city to get a job, why are these urban residents unemployed and needing our tax money? Can we stop the convoluted lies propping this all up?

The barbarians are not at the gates. These are shock troops. They will riot only if Democratic leadership thinks it is useful. The gates were opened from within, and the silver handed over willingly. The shutdown is merely the moment we notice the treasury is empty, and that the Vikings, far from starving, have grown fat on our fear.
65   AD   2025 Oct 31, 2:28pm  

Patrick says

Democratic leadership


That includes the Democrat activist and Woke jurists like this one: https://www.npr.org/2025/10/31/nx-s1-5592366/snap-food-benefits-judge-trump-administration-usda-wic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indira_Talwani

I noticed Felicity Huffman was charged with "honest services fraud". I wonder if the same activist judge would charge Democrat activists with mail in ballot fraud with honest services fraud as far as harming legal voters.
66   Misc   2025 Oct 31, 3:19pm  

So, a District Judge tells the Executive Branch that it must pay Food Stamps.

I feel the Executive Branch should simply ignore this court order as it is blatantly unconstitutional. We cannot allow a District Court Judge to determine what constitutes an "Emergency". with regards to actions taken by the Executive Branch.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/snap-benefits-must-continue-despite-shutdown-judge-tells-trump-administration/ar-AA1PAwua
68   Ceffer   2025 Oct 31, 5:54pm  

Ghettogeld for the Visigoth fifth column of chronic incompetent and criminally inclined cuckoo birds who vote for their Democratgeld plantation owners.
69   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 Oct 31, 7:36pm  

Misc says

So, a District Judge tells the Executive Branch that it must pay Food Stamps.

If Trump must pay Food Stamps out of contingency funds, then it certainly can pay for constitutionally essential things like the military.
70   Misc   2025 Oct 31, 7:44pm  

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

If Trump must pay Food Stamps out of contingency funds, then it certainly can pay for constitutionally essential things like the military.


It's simply not Constitutional as I stated. By this reasoning the Judicial Branch usurps control of the purse which belongs to Congress.
71   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 Oct 31, 7:45pm  

Misc says


It's simply not Constitutional as I stated. By this reasoning the Judicial Branch usurps control of the purse which belongs to Congress.

Yep.

But the dumbass Judge just gave Trump wiggle room that he did not intend to give him.

If the Dems try lawfare to stop that, the AG is going to be like "Well this District Court said SNAP had to be paid, and what could be more vital than military wages?"
72   Patrick   2025 Oct 31, 9:05pm  


Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen Reports
@honestpollster

If SNAP were cutoff in the US, Walmart US stores would have a negative
operating margin.

SNAP is literally what makes Walmart profitable.

Might want to short Walmart stock if we're going to stay shut down.

Oct 26, 2025
73   Misc   2025 Oct 31, 9:31pm  

Makes sense, the richest family in America getting its funds from the government.
76   Glock-n-Load   2025 Nov 1, 12:35pm  

Patrick says






It’s the same in giver/taker relationships. The animosity, that is.
78   Ceffer   2025 Nov 1, 4:27pm  

Are we going to discover that the bulk of the EBT and SNAP are not about food but about funding a vast black market of money laundering substitutions that support drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and ghetto glitter?
79   stereotomy   2025 Nov 1, 4:34pm  

Ceffer says

Are we going to discover that the bulk of the EBT and SNAP are not about food but about funding a vast black market of money laundering substitutions that support drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and ghetto glitter?

Yes.
81   Patrick   2025 Nov 2, 7:00pm  

stereotomy says


Ceffer says


Are we going to discover that the bulk of the EBT and SNAP are not about food but about funding a vast black market of money laundering substitutions that support drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and ghetto glitter?

Yes.



It's also a subsidy to retail food stores.

The government could buy wholesale food and let people in real need pick it up. That would save taxpayers billions. But it would cut into Walmart's profits.
82   RC2006   2025 Nov 2, 9:00pm  




Soda #2
83   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 Nov 2, 9:49pm  

Patrick says


The government could buy wholesale food and let people in real need pick it up. That would save taxpayers billions. But it would cut into Walmart's profits.

Government could just let Walmart do it and save most of the distribution costs. They pick up their Government Cheese, ham and bacon ends, chicken hearts and pig's feet and other low interest meat products, various seasonal, surplus fresh fruits and veggies, and rice and beans. 1 Box a week, come get it, no choice.
88   Booger   2025 Nov 3, 2:22am  

The 21 states that refused to send their SNAP data to the USDA are:

California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Hawaii
Illinois
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
And, of course, Washington, D.C. is in the mix too.

These states are stonewalling because they know the fraud is massive. When you hide the books, it’s never to protect the honest folks—it’s to cover up the rot. Meanwhile, the states that did cooperate are already exposing exactly the kind of abuse the left swears doesn’t exist.

« First        Comments 49 - 88 of 103       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste