patrick.net

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

No answers

Admittedly, his quote has been taken out of context. But, it's the same method that Kulak uses with the Scriptures in order to justify his blind support for the secular, political, Zionist modern State of Israel that is being run by the crook terrorist Netanyahu.

stereotomy says

The assumption here is that only 60% enriched uranium will be used. How do you use 60% uranium? You mix it in with natural uranium to obtain the proper degree of enrichment for the reactor design.

How many nuclear powered submarines or aircraft carriers does Iran have, and have they completed just one functioning version of those small highly efficient reactors?

What commercial reactor needs hundreds of Kgs of 60%+ enriched U-235 to function?

Is Iran on the vanguard of efficiency or just working through it's first few domestic nuclear plant?

Is Iran the size and scope of US Industry that it needs to dispose of highly enriched uranium? Why bother in the first place?

Why is Iran delaying their commercial program by enriching so much 60%+ uranium instead of just going to 4-5%? 20% for one research reactor, tops.

Is the Enrichment step from 60 to 90% shorter or longer than 20% to 60%?

24-7-365 100% proof of Iran's benign intent at all times. All members of the IRGC and Ayatollah hooked up to a Mind Reading Device at all times, with a kill switch that makes a Harrison Bergeron device go off in their earlobe

OR

No capability, so no need to worry about intent.

Which one is a better guarantee of no nukes?

Kulak,

Do you favor a pre-emptive bombing of North Korea because they hate us and have plenty of nukes? If not, why not?

(Answer: of course not. Where's the 'blessing' in that?)

RayAmerica says

Do you favor a pre-emptive bombing of North Korea because they hate us and have plenty of nukes? If not, why not?

What pre-emptive?

North Korea already has nukes (thanks Bill!), and China holds them on a tight leash economically and politically and militarily.

Iran does not have a nuke yet (at least we hope so). Iran is ruled by a Theocracy with an Apocalyptic Mission.

It's better to stop the crazy man from having a LMG, than to wait until after he's announced his willingness to clear the block of traffic.

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

Iran does not have a nuke yet

Russian leader claims multiple nations are ‘ready to directly supply Iran’ with nuclear weapons following U.S. attack

Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev warned that multiple nations are “ready” to supply Iran with nuclear warheads following the United States’ airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday.

Medvedev, a former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council issued a series of X posts following the United States’ attack against Iran.

Medvedev stated Iran’s “enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue.”

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/russian-leader-claims-multiple-nations-are-ready-to-directly-supply-iran-with-nuclear-weapons-following-u-s-attack/

”What commercial reactor needs hundreds of Kgs of 60%+ enriched U-235 to function?

Is Iran on the vanguard of efficiency or just working through it's first few domestic nuclear plant?

Is Iran the size and scope of US Industry that it needs to dispose of highly enriched uranium? Why bother in the first place?”

A country that’s been embargoed for 45 years might not expect a ready supply of foreign-sourced 4% uranium. Hence the 100 kg stockpile of 60%.

To be facile, if I expected an orange juice shortage, I’d stockpile oj concentrate.

You can never truly know intent.

But can track capability very accurately.

goofus says

A country that’s been embargoed for 45 years might not expect a ready supply of foreign-sourced 4% uranium. Hence the 100 kg stockpile of 60%.

To be facile, if I expected an orange juice shortage, I’d stockpile oj concentrate.

Can the Big and Little Satans disappear the world's 5th largest oil reserve from beneath the surface of Iran?

I think something else was going on with those sites, and nukes were and have been a straw man bogey. Iran can probably purchase black market nukes (or have them gifted) or use dirty bombs without enriched uranium. They already have the rockets to send such.

No radiation at all after the bombings? "Moving" the stockpiles out is another bogey. There would have been SOME kind of radiation signature after the bombings.

So, there was likely other kinds of tech thing going on there, and they likely have DUMBS that extend for long distances underground from the sites. They probably wouldn't have needed surface transport at all to move or remove anything.

Trump stole that move from Kirk's manipulation in Star Trek 2 of Khan when saying “weeks” for “days”, as Spock says “days” for “hours.”

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

goofus says

A country that’s been embargoed for 45 years might not expect a ready supply of foreign-sourced 4% uranium. Hence the 100 kg stockpile of 60%.

To be facile, if I expected an orange juice shortage, I’d stockpile oj concentrate.

Can the Big and Little Satans disappear the world's 5th largest oil reserve from beneath the surface of Iran?

Reactors aren’t easy to start and stop. I imagine they’d rather not run out of fuel for those, and prepared with enriched U accordingly. Sure, they could rely on fossil fuels. But that’s another topic of Iran wanting to seem technologically developed. Like their obsession with fighter jets and other symbolic displays of modernity.

goofus says

Reactors aren’t easy to start and stop. I imagine they’d rather not run out of fuel for those, and prepared with enriched U accordingly. Sure, they could rely on fossil fuels. But that’s another topic of Iran wanting to seem technologically developed. Like their obsession with fighter jets and other symbolic displays of modernity.

So they know they're under scrutiny, but decide to create a large stockpile HEUs and the ability to enrich further.

During the 60 days, Trump offers to provide commercial nuclear tech but the HEU enrichment must stop.

Again, this is Iran trying to run down the clock to October, when an agreement on sanctions against Iran if they are in violation of exceeding nuclear development limits expire:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/world/middleeast/un-iaea-iran-nuclear-program.html

(Just for the rundown of what Trump wanted that Iran refused to comply with)

So Iran has every incentive to bog down the US with negotiations, continue to enrich Uranium, knowing the longer they delay, the transnational agreement to sanction it expires later this year.

Finally, building nuclear research facilities hundreds of miles feet underground isn't for public safety, it's to fend off what just exactly happened. Another strange intense use of resources that can only be explained by a desire to push towards a bomb - or the ability to make one in days or weeks.

I don't think any State depends on propeller planes anymore for Air Power.

"I don't need all those bases. I can shoot you from way over here."

"They only scream 'Death to America' because of Israhell's genocide in Gaza!"

Uh, no:

When I want to build a peaceful nuclear energy program, I always build it deep below the surface where it requires 30,000-pound bunker busters to access it, while pledging to die rather than surrender it.

When a large country with clean energy offers me some fuel and tech so I don't have to do it all myself, I reject it. Just cause I like to spend lots of money as a mid-tier entity.

Because you see, I'm really passionate about clean energy.

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

When I want to build a peaceful nuclear energy program, I always build it deep below the surface where it requires 30,000-pound bunker busters to access it, while pledging to die rather than surrender it.

When a large country with clean energy offers me some fuel and tech so I don't have to do it all myself, I reject it. Just cause I like to spend lots of money as a mid-tier entity.

Because you see, I'm really passionate about clean energy.

Think about it for at least a minute, and you'll understand why a country might want to do that in Middle East.

Patrick says

Collect all the homeless poop off the streets of SF and LA. Problem solved. Newsome would probably fuck up this one too.

https://x.com/Skriptkeeper17/status/1936957160057110832?t=7CDDRMdroxrck7b2pYWhFA&s=35

https://t.me/Royboy17th/8707

Sounds like Mossad and the Israeli air force get to play a really cool hide and go seek game with the Iranians and the enriched uranium.

It's strange but I can't remember any summer since the 1960's when there wasn't some shit going on in the Middle East.

It's too bad we're directly involving ourselves in it.

I wish they could make four assholes "magically disappear"; Putin, Xi, Kim, Khomeini.

clambo says

It's strange but I can't remember any summer since the 1960's when there wasn't some shit going on in the Middle East.

It's too bad we're directly involving ourselves in it.

I wish they could make four assholes "magically disappear"; Putin, Xi, Kim, Khomeini.

wars aren’t meant to end. we hated russia for communism, when they changed we made up other reasons to hate them. its all a giant lie. even if these 4 gone, we’ll make reasons to hate another 4. but never look at our own faults and problems.

What an unexpected outcome, Iran bombs the US base in Qatar:
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-858726

I guess you don’t get peace through bombing. You also undo the friendships Trump had formed with Saudi peninsula countries.

How did Trump fall for this obvious trap? Of course Israel wants us to fight their regime change war in Iran. No, they don’t want the US forming durable alliances with wealthy Arab states.

https://michaelyon.substack.com/p/iran-blasts-israeli-power-plant-at

Iran Blasts Israeli Power Plant at Ashdod

Power Out

The world of perpetual head fake optics. Pike Hegelian antipodes manufactured from the Cairo Lodge. Pahlavi is also affiliated with Iranian Freemason Lodge in LA.

A US senator says that the Iranians didn't move the enriched uranium out of Fordo, and in fact probably moved extra into it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/u-s-intel-found-iran-did-not-move-nuclear-material-from-fordo-ahead-of-attack-sen-mullin-says/ar-AA1HgodX

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-bourne-coincydink-monday-june

Here’s the thing: the enriched uranium apparently wasn’t at the three bombed sites. “The stockpile was believed to have been mainly at Isfahan,” the Journal reported. “But it could have been moved.” Iran moved it beforehand —confirming advance notice— but leaving something to negotiate over.

Which brings us to this curious line from VP Vance on ABC’s This Week: “We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel, and that’s one of the things we’re going to have conversations with the Iranians about.”

Vance pointed out that, following the strikes, Iran no longer has the ability to rapidly weaponize the fuel. “And that was really the goal here,” he said. Critics cried he was moving the goalposts! But … was he? What if he’s telling the truth? What if this is all going according to a backroom agreement?

Let’s try a little thought experiment. Picture the tense U.S.-Iran talks before Saturday’s strikes. Suppose Iran agreed to permanently shut down the three enrichment sites. “Okay,” the U.S. negotiators say, “but we need to bomb them.” Then, “fine,” say the mullahs, “just give us a couple days to rent some U-Hauls and pack up the centrifuges.”

Even temporary rubble over those labs buys everyone breathing room and cools the radioactive fever. Now the big question is: what happens to the uranium? Funny you should ask. Yesterday, Iran’s foreign minister arrived in Moscow to meet with Vladimir Putin. The meeting’s agenda is “consultations on how to proceed,” the Journal said, without explaining further.

Proceed… with what, exactly? It’s possible they are discussing terms for Russian custody of Iran’s enriched uranium— a job the Russians have previously volunteered for. Obviously, I don’t know. I’m just a lawyer. We’ll know soon enough whether my theory holds plutonium.

They've always had and can continue to have the fuel. It was to take out sites that would enrich it to weapons grade. IL has the most nuclear power. That doesn't mean our sites are making bombs with it. That takes a different facility. Trump targeted those facilities. There may have been no uranium there at the time. It's the equipment. Think cooking meth on Breaking Bad to simplify it. We took out the equipment for them to cook bombs so to speak.

Iran has nukes for power. The US hasn't had much of a problem with countries using it for that. All shit goes haywire when 20-30 countries have nukes. Use it for power, not destruction. We've used restraint for about 75 years. Not all countries can once they get them.

we nuked Japan twice, what restraint?

Fortwaye says

we nuked Japan twice, what restraint?

After the second Bomb, hundreds of officers and men under Major Hatanaka tried to steal the recording of the emperor's surrender and hold NHK broadcasters hostage, and force the Emperor to abdicate. The coup failed by a hair.

Kyujo incident.

There were also coup attempts across Japan by groups of IJA militants after the surrender was broadcast

Back to Dep... Deportations:

SCOTUS okays deportation of illegals to 3rd Party Countries without lawfare-ridden hearings
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf

Really? I don't understand why oil would go down with a huge threat to the supply.

Seems to be true:

https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/energy/

Patrick says

Violence works!

"Tucker, I am scratching a possession into you. Oppose the West using violence to ensure it's safety and interests..."

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

Patrick says

Violence works!

It's the only thing that works, really.