by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 102,210 - 102,249 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
At what point do people move on with their lives over one person?If they don't have lives, they don't move on. Someone made the point that conservatives have lives, people on the left don't, politics is their life.
I don't think that is true. Attempting and failing to commit a crime, is still a crime.
The mueller report "legal theories" on obstruction were rejected by barr.
the report's clear outcome on "no collusion"
That is that the Trump campaigns contact with the Russians was dishonest, immoral and unethical.
, Team HRC had MANY illicit contacts w the Russians and Ukrainians which is now indeed under investigation of actual real crimes,
Russia intervened in the 2016 election to hurt Clinton and help Trump, and did so in a systematic manner. Trump's people welcomed this and one can make a strong case they still do
21 posts and 19 by the OP...Is that a new record?
He has been treated far worse than Obama ever was. By miles.
The network did once clash with the Obama administration, in what Mr. Lamb describes as “one of the strangest things I’ve ever seen.” During a taped 2010 interview, Mr. Lamb asked President Obama about redecorating the Oval Office. “Given that we are in the midst of some very difficult economic times,” Mr. Obama replied, “we decided to hold off last year in terms of making some changes.”
Weeks later, the White House unveiled fresh decor, including an Oval Office rug printed with quotations chosen specifically by Mr. Obama. This contradiction posed a small PR problem for the president. When C-Span immediately aired its unedited tape, the White House press shop was displeased.
“Out of that,” Mr. Lamb says, “came an attitude toward us, from Josh Earnest, that I still, to this day, do not understand.” From then on, C-Span received no cooperation from the Obama White House. “As a matter of fact, the next Christmas party, they made sure we had less tickets,” he says. “In their little world that they lived in down there, it was a way to retaliate.”
Just came across an example of the Obama Era, from an article about Brian Lamb retiring:
More like so much dirt, that no matter what he does, everyone is like, yeah, whatever, we already knew he was amoral and corrupt.
Trump did not break any laws. Therefore he is still our President.
Trump is actually doing a fantastic job, objectively speaking.
But over all Trump is a tremendous blow to this country's image,
Obama was far worse about retaliating against bad press than Trump has been
I yearn for the days when Tan suits were scandals. Now they would not even be a blimp on the news.
I yearn for the days when Tan suits were scandals. Now they would not even be a blimp on the news.
But by fact-checking, the paper really means judging various claims against liberal orthodoxies. Case in point: The claim in question was Trump’s protest that “Russia” is “fake news to try to make up for the loss of the Democrats.” The Washington Post judged that to be “false.” The Mueller report suggests otherwise.
« First « Previous Comments 102,210 - 102,249 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,052 comments by 14,896 users - mell, Patrick online now