by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 110,063 - 110,102 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
mell says2017-18 season had 80k deaths. What's your point? It's like a severe influenza season.
That is my point 80k deaths is a servere flu season, not to be confused with a "typical" or "normal" flu season. We will be blowing by a "typical" or "normal" flu season in a few days.
Sorry, I'm just being logical.
The plan is to restore solvency to SS by reducing payees.
said Sanchez, a life coach and mother of five in this prosperous desert community. (She is a distant relative of Republican Utah Sen. Mitt Romney.)
Sanchez considers Trump “reprehensible as a human being” and the Republican Party morally bankrupt. “I couldn’t be a part of it anymore,” she said, and as a result, at age 40 the newly registered independent is weighing her first-ever Democratic vote for president.
“It’s amazing the change, in just the last few years,” said Q. Whitfield Ayres, a pollster who has spent decades strategizing for Republican campaigns and causes. “It’s not any one place. It’s everywhere.”
mell saysYou could probably "save" hundreds of thousands of lives every year dying of environmental causes, pneumoniae, lung cancer, you name it by shutting down all industrial production and all car traffic, INCLUDING electric cars which kill as many people if you take manufacturing and small particle dust into account. CV-19 is no different just because it's contagious. If you shut down everything you would likely also shut down all technological and medical progress, and of course cause world-wide economic and real starvation and depression, suicides etc. There are always trade-offs and this one is clearly not worth it
Again false equivalency. I am not against opening the economy and take some dead COVID-19 patients. I am against deaths before we take some valid protective measures such as test and trace . I also do not want to increase the hospitalization burden rate beyond capacity.
There is no hospitalization burden as of now in 99% of areas. They deferred all elective surgery and turned away other patients to be ready for the "surge" which never came. Many of those patients in need of their continued treatment or surgery you mentioned are currently being held at arms bay by unreliable models and population-control fantasies. The severe Covid-19 patients need a bed and a ventilator and some drugs, they don't need any of the hospitals complex devices and procedures necessary to other patients. If they're so worried about a surge, keep the makeshift field hospitals in conference centers and tents that they just shuttered again, since no large gathering will be allowed anyways, and pay those suffering hotels/businesses some rent. Let the real hospitals be open for all the other patients and open up already. That way you'd also reduce contagion within the hospitals. This is beyond bullshit at this point and the majority of the population is held hostage. I hope the protesters won't give up to get their lives back until we opened up everywhere to a reasonable level again. Face-masks will help keep the spread at bay.
mell saysSince you apply logic you should agree with this, Spock would have weighed the greater good for the young masses over saving a few who mostly already lived 80% or more of their lives.
I think I can agree with that. Did captain Kirk always side with Spock's logic? You should be able to agree with this, Spoke would have needed to know how the virus affects people before he would have been able to make any logical determination.
mell saysThere is no hospitalization burden as of now in 99% of areas.
It is with lock down. And where did you get the 99% rate . Can you please provide refernce.
mell saysThe only area where they ever had to use makeshift hospitals mentioned in the news/media was NY and that was short lived. What other state had to resort to mass field hospitals?
Maybe Louisiana? Irregardless, the point of SIP was to keep hospitals at a manageable level so it appears SIP has been working.
Keyword is "still". Step back and ponder why you're not thinking this through beyond today?
You should be able to agree with this, Spoke would have needed to know how the virus affects people before he would have been able to make any logical determination
WookieMan saysAt this point it's probably too late, hence why I'm saying tomorrow doesn't matter from your above quote. There are fewer and fewer victims to kill as the days go by. This ship has sailed and there was zero way to prevent that outside of China and the WHO not being cunts. Destroying the economy and politicizing this in many cases is pure evil.
It's a fair point, the ship may have sailed or no matter what we do this is going to keep coming back. 1% or whatever are going to die, mostly the aged, and that's that. I don't agree with this since I don't see it as inevitable. We're pretty good at coming up with cures, and I think we will whether that's TrumpPills or Remdesivir or whatever with a bit of time.
.
Tenpoundbass saysHe saved about 1,970,000 lives according to Dr Fauci and Dr Bitchx
That's right, he had to walk back everything he said, listen to Dr Fauci and Birx to save 1,970,000 lives.
Shame that right now he has the loaded gun pointed at his foot again.
That's all he talks about right? And that's supposed to make up for sitting on his ass for the next 48 days as 430,000 people still traveled to the US from China after the travel ban and we got a massive outbreak anyway?
“Less than half of L.A. County residents still have jobs amid coronavirus crisis“
rd6B saysI'd argue that if it was thought that it is a dangerous disease then instead of screaming ORANGE RACIST! HATES CHINESE!
Trump closed travel, then downplayed the disease. For a month and a half. Isn't that odd? Why did he close anything if he didn't think it was dangerous?
Trump closed travel,
did he?
then downplayed the disease. For a month and a half.
That's right, he had to walk back everything he said, listen to Dr Fauci and Birx to save 1,970,000 lives.
Or you the alt-right media and Trump, which just wanted everyone to burn in the theater.
https://patrick.net/post/1330788/2020-03-15-obama-and-trump-response-to-pandemics
Ceffer saysThe Psychopath Media. The time of yelling fire in the movie theater to cause a stampede is long past. Psychopaths don't care if a hundred people lose a hundred dollars, as long as they gained one dollar.
More than a dozen U.S. researchers, physicians and public health experts, many of them from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, were working full time at the Geneva headquarters of the World Health Organization as the novel coronavirus emerged late last year and transmitted real-time information about its discovery and spread in China to the Trump administration, according to U.S. and international officials.
14 January 2020
WHO's technical lead for the response noted in a press briefing there may have been limited human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus (in the 41 confirmed cases), mainly through family members, and that there was a risk of a possible wider outbreak. The lead also said that human-to-human transmission would not be surprising given our experience with SARS, MERS and other respiratory pathogens.
Based on the available information there is no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission. No additional cases have been detected since 3 January 2020 in China.
« First « Previous Comments 110,063 - 110,102 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,255 comments by 15,059 users - goofus, The_Deplorable online now