invite response« First « Previous Comments 30 - 69 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
Dan8267
2014 Oct 7, 2:25pm
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
What if the kid can touch the back of his head with his tongue or pick up dimes from the sidewalk with his dick without bending his knees?
That would make him a Centari.
Dan8267
2014 Oct 7, 2:28pm
Let's get real. If these chicks were ugly, everybody on PatNet would be calling for them to be thrown in a dungeon.
In our society, whether a person, male or female, is guilty of a sex crime is largely determined by how attractive he/she is.
Strategist
2014 Oct 7, 2:33pm
Rin, a question for you......How many women have you had sex with in your lifetime?
And remember Rin, Strategist counts blow-up women.
In that case Dan, how many women have you had sex with in your lifetime?
indigenous
2014 Oct 7, 2:34pm
Who is the victim in this crime?
This seems like an example of statutory law as opposed to common law. The former is more of a law by decree rather than practicality.
Strategist
2014 Oct 7, 2:42pm
Who is the victim in this crime?
Every other 16 year old in the school who did not get lucky.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 7, 2:51pm
A lot of very predictable 'wish it had been me' type comments on here. Putting that aside, if this is true, those two women are a couple of seriously stupid individuals.
indigenous
2014 Oct 7, 2:53pm
those two women are a couple of seriously stupid individuals.
They are government employees that is an oxymoron
Bigsby
2014 Oct 7, 2:57pm
those two women are a couple of seriously stupid individuals.
They are government employees that is an oxymoron
You need to look up the meaning of oxymoron.
indigenous
2014 Oct 7, 3:04pm
You need to look up the meaning of oxymoron.
Then it is redundant to say government employees are "seriously stupid".
Vicente
2014 Oct 7, 3:05pm
In our society, whether a person, male or female, is guilty of a sex crime is largely determined by how attractive he/she is.
I disagree.
Females get a free pass here, and I'm good with that.
"If that's child molestation, I would wish this curse on every young boy." - Charles Fawcett
Ceffer
2014 Oct 7, 4:11pm
As if they don't have enough trouble, the two tempestuous teachers are being sued by the rest of the 16 year old boys in the school for sexual discrimination.
The boys are insisting that it to go to a lottery system next time.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 7, 4:14pm
You need to look up the meaning of oxymoron.
Then it is redundant to say government employees are "seriously stupid".
That's your opinion. It's not mine. Either way, it wasn't an oxymoron.
Peter P
2014 Oct 7, 4:21pm
In our society, whether a person, male or female, is guilty of a sex crime is largely determined by how attractive he/she is.
In an evolutionary world, attractive people should get better treatment. ;-)
indigenous
2014 Oct 7, 4:33pm
That's your opinion. It's not mine. Either way, it wasn't an oxymoron.
Colloquially it is an oxymoron, technically military intelligence is not an oxymoron but is accepted as one.
Here in Calif we have some of the highest paid teachers in the US who teach students who are almost the worst in the US. And that goes across the board for the Calpers and Police and Fire. The status quo is more important than anything else which makes for some pretty fucking stupid employees.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 7, 4:51pm
That's your opinion. It's not mine. Either way, it wasn't an oxymoron.
Colloquially it is an oxymoron, technically military intelligence is not an oxymoron but is accepted as one.
Here in Calif we have some of the highest paid teachers in the US who teach students who are almost the worst in the US. And that goes across the board for the Calpers and Police and Fire. The status quo is more important than anything else which makes for some pretty fucking stupid employees.
Sigh.
Three happy ending, whats the problem.
Boy got bright future, he can bang his way up.
Women, were deprived and got some.
This guys should publish a book.
PeopleUnited
2014 Oct 8, 12:44am
The real victims here are the husband and three children of the straying wife and mother.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 8, 12:49am
The real victims here are the husband and three children of the straying wife and mother.
As his wife is seemingly capable of something so ridiculously stupid, I'd say he's well shot.
justme
2014 Oct 8, 12:51am
A lot of very predictable 'wish it had been me' type comments on here. Putting that aside, if this is true, those two women are a couple of seriously stupid individuals.
I cannot put that aside. Rape of a man by a woman is every bit as serious a crime as rape of a woman by a man. Rape is not just violence, but it is also an act of taking away a person's reproductive freedom, which is a very serious matter.
Do not forget that male rape victims are being exploited and enslaved to support children that were conceived by rape.
Can you imagine the outrage if a 30 year male teacher raped and impregnated a 16 year old female student, then gained custody of the child, then demanded child support payments from the student when she turned 18? I think the level of outrage would cause teh internets to destruct from overheating.
Equality means equality, not this evil bullshit were men are always to blame and women are always the poor victim. Enough already.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 8, 1:17am
I cannot put that aside. Rape of a man by a woman is every bit as serious a crime as rape of a woman by a man. Rape is not just violence, but it is also an act of taking away a person's reproductive freedom, which is a very serious matter.
You consider a 16 year-old having consensual sex rape? What's the age of consent in your country? It's always struck me as rather dubious that such an act is legal for everyone except those in positions of responsibility (in the UK). It should either be legal for all or illegal.
I do, however, think those 2 women failed in their responsibilities as teachers and should not be allowed to teach again. As for locking them away...
justme
2014 Oct 8, 1:52am
You consider a 16 year-old having consensual sex rape?
It's what the law says. What I am saying is that the law should not be ignored when it comes to male victims, while men are thrown into jail for a lifetime for engaging in exactly the the same act with a willing 16-year old female.
What's the age of consent in your country?
We both live in California. The age of consent here is 18. It would be much more sensible if it was 16, but whatever the law is, it should be applied equally to men and women.
It's always struck me as rather dubious that such an act is legal for everyone except those in positions of responsibility (in the UK). It should either be legal for all or illegal.
I can agree with that, too. Please note everyone that in UK the age of consent is 16. The rape cases I have been referring to were NOT in the UK. But you can bet your bottom Pound Sterling that the "positions of responsibility" law is being applied unequally to male and female perpetrators. Just google it.
justme
2014 Oct 8, 2:38am
You forgot to blame on the right-wing..
No, no, this one *is* Obama's fault, at least in a proverbial sense. Democrats have a complete blind spot when it comes to men's rights and the true meaning of gender equality. If the Democrats started to apply some intelligence to their massively flawed gender politics, Democrats would not lose an election for a long time, and the Republican party would become irrelevant.
The Republicans (and the top1% that run the agenda of the party) know that gender politics is THE weak spot of the Democratic platform, and boy, are they milking that issue for all it's worth.
indigenous
2014 Oct 8, 2:51am
If the Democrats started to apply some intelligence to their massively flawed gender politics
Splain please?
Peter P
2014 Oct 8, 2:52am
I do, however, think those 2 women failed in their responsibilities as teachers and should not be allowed to teach again. As for locking them away...
Look, what they did was wrong and illegal... but so is jaywalking.
justme
2014 Oct 8, 3:13am
If the Democrats started to apply some intelligence to their massively flawed gender politics
Splain please?
Do I have to? I hope you are asking an honest question.... There have been plenty of threads on pat.net, especially the last 6-12 months, illustrating how feminism has demonized and unjustly punished men and relegated them to 2nd class citizenship under the law.
To quote myself:
"Where have you been the last 50 years? Are you aware that that ever since the age of Television started in the 1950s, men as a group have been demonized and accused of being collectively responsible for every kind of misdeed imaginable, whether misdeeds actually happened or not, and whether or not they were guilty of anything. False accusations of child abuse, child molestation, domestic violence, rape and murder of women have been staples of feminist propaganda for 50 years now."
I'll add:
As part of and result of the above propaganda campaign, men are given unequal treatment in the family court system, they are robbed of their children, robbed of their earnings, being subject to paternity fraud (forced by law to pay child support for their (ex-)wives children that are not the man's biological offspring), jailed based on false accusations, given much longer jail sentences than women for exactly the same crime, being falsely accused of every misdeed from sexual harassment to rape AND falsely convicted. Did you read the thread about the "YES-MEANS-NO" law and the kangaroo court system instituted to adjucate "sexual assault" in California universities?
90% of this evil bullshit is either pushed or enabled by the Democratic party. Mind you, I am not giving the Republican party a free pass. The Republican bosses LOVE how working class women are busy fighting their own men, and how working class men respond by seeking refuge with the Republicans, against their own economic self-interest. Not that the Republican top 1% really give a shit, they prefer working class men paying unjust child support rather than having to pay higher taxes themselves.
Whew. Is that enough? Please read up on and understand men's rights and issues. The Democrats have it completely wrong on this topic, and the Republicans are exploiting it for all it's worth.
Rin
2014 Oct 8, 3:28am
Can I have a teacher who looks like Olivia Wilde?
What do you want her to teach?
Psychology, as in Freudian dream analysis :-)
Peter P
2014 Oct 8, 3:30am
Psychology, as in Freudian dream analysis :-)
Not something more transcendental like the second coming of man? ;-)
indigenous
2014 Oct 8, 3:43am
The Democrats have it completely wrong on this topic, and the Republicans are exploiting it for all it's worth.
Ok, just wasn't sure what your angle was, all I can say is yup.
Gloria Steinem's legacy.
The whole thing about unequal pay is purely stat manipulation by rabble rousers.
The real problem is that the majority does not think about the 3rd party.
First just look for things that do not add up, people will then react to what is being said without a second thought, (mutts), or they will have long winded plausible reasons why this or that.
The point it that when things don't add, it is ALWAYS a who question not a why question.
E.G.
War (13 yr in current one) 3rd party = defense contractors
Women's equality = not sure if Democrats or someone higher up
Minimum wage = SEIU
Democrats = Lawyers and unions
Republican = defense contractors
ACA = Big Pharma and insurance companies
Drugs being illegal = Prison guard unions et.al.
Monopoly Suits = the biggest company's competitors
The Civil War = Protectionists(north) putting huge tariffs on South
Excess money supply in the 1920s = the US practicing mercantilism
Bigsby
2014 Oct 8, 4:07am
We both live in California. The age of consent here is 18. It would be much more sensible if it was 16, but whatever the law is, it should be applied equally to men and women.
I don't live in California. I have a home there. And an age of consent of 18 strikes me as extremely puritanical. The vast majority of countries in Europe are 16 (or under). Only 4 are above that.
It's what the law says. What I am saying is that the law should not be ignored when it comes to male victims, while men are thrown into jail for a lifetime for engaging in exactly the the same act with a willing 16-year old female.
Who's ignoring it? I'm making the point that I don't consider it rape irrespective of whether it's a man or a woman.
justme
2014 Oct 8, 4:10am
And an age of consent of 18 strikes me as extremely puritanical.
It is not even puritanical, it is all about restricting the supply. Or exploting the elasticity of the demand. Or some such. Ask Paul Krugman, he could probably put better words on it.
Peter P
2014 Oct 8, 4:12am
Ask Paul Krugman, he could probably put better words on it.
My eyes rolled so hard they nearly got stuck.
Bigsby
2014 Oct 8, 4:16am
And an age of consent of 18 strikes me as extremely puritanical.
It is not even puritanical, it is all about restricting the supply. Or exploting the elasticity of the demand. Or some such. Ask Paul Krugman, he could probably put better words on it.
What? It's just one of a number of questionable laws in a country that still appears to have a strong puritanical thread running through it.
Peter P
2014 Oct 8, 4:22am
And an age of consent of 18 strikes me as extremely puritanical.
Parents here don't want to take personal responsibility. They always look to elected lawmakers for help.
Rin
2014 Oct 8, 4:35am
And an age of consent of 18 strikes me as extremely puritanical.
Parents here don't want to take personal responsibility. They always look to elected lawmakers for help.
The thing is that '18' is a legal demarcation of being an adult. Heaven forbid that they raise the age of boinking to that of drinking. I couldn't imagine w/o a boink till 21.
« First « Previous Comments 30 - 69 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.heraldguide.com/details.php?id=14842
Two Destrehan High School teachers have been arrested after allegedly having a threesome with a student who was 16 at the time.
English teacher Shelley Dufresne, 33, of 805 Country Cottage Blvd. in Montz, was charged with carnal knowledge of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Fellow English teacher Rachel Respess, 23, of Kenner, faces the same charges.
Dufresne is married with three children and has been teaching at DHS for 10 years. Respess graduated from Destrehan in 2008 and has been teaching at the school for two years.
The student is 17 years old now, but was 16 at the time the alleged crime took place. The student bragged to classmates about having sex with two teachers, which resulted in a St. Charles Parish Sheriff’s Office investigation at Destrehan on Friday, Sept. 26.
According to the Sheriff’s Office, the first crime took place in the early part of September in Montz.
A second incident allegedly took place in Kenner after the Destrehan versus Helen Cox football game on Friday, Sept. 12. Kenner Police Chief Michael Glaser said both teachers are accused of having sex with the student in Respess' home on West Esplanade Avenue that night.
He said that Respess was the student's English teacher last year, while Dufresne taught the student English this year.
St. Charles Parish School Board member Al Suffrin said the situation is troubling.
“It gives the district a black eye. It is obviously something we don’t like to see happen because it is a distraction. It gets in the way of what our core business is.,†he said.
Suffrin said the school district has overcome such situations before, but it makes the job of all educators more difficult when such issues arise.
“Generally speaking we have enough challenges as it is. We didn’t need something like this to happen to add to the challenges we already have. It is a difficult enough task,†he said. “When something like this happens it is more than just a bump in road. We work so hard to make strides and progress and something like this is a setback.
“We’ve had other challenges we’ve faced and overcome.â€
Dufresne was first arrested for carnal knowledge of a juvenile on Tuesday in St. Charles Parish. She was released after posting bond, but was rebooked with additional charges on Wednesday in Kenner.
Both teachers have been suspended without pay, according to Stevie Crovetto, public information director for St. Charles Parish Public Schools.
#crime