by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 129 - 168 of 202 Next » Last » Search these comments
Maybe Hillary ran for President just to get into the oval office, to take revenge on Bill, by having a male intern eat her pussy.
TwoScoopsPlissken saysA small selection of heroes today.
Contrast that with the high-on-the-Maslow-Scale virtue signalers soon to engage in punditry on the news stations.
I saw Democratic response. It was just a colossal whining in comparison. That's what Democratic party has become, a party of whining SJW's.
Trump delivered a truly memorable speech about jobs, something America needs! It's pretty clear the direction we are heading in.
Trump Can Sell an Improved Economy, but Not Himself
By PETER BAKER 14 minutes ago
He passed tax cuts, and the economy he inherited continues to grow. But many Americans still hold dismal views of Mr. Trump.
Many Americans held still hold dismal views of Mr. Obama too, but the NY Times would absolutely never print such a statement. Why is that?
And the NY Times, true to form, has to find negative things to say about Trump no matter what he does:Trump Can Sell an Improved Economy, but Not Himself
By PETER BAKER 14 minutes ago
He passed tax cuts, and the economy he inherited continues to grow. But many Americans still hold dismal views of Mr. Trump.
Many Americans held still hold dismal views of Mr. Obama too, but the NY Times would absolutely never print such a statement. Why is that?
Lying,5 time draft dodging coward, admitted sexual harasser,Racist/Nazi sympathizer,pedophile advocate,Republican,Adulterer (as in :Your are going to get fucked over)?
Which part do you disagree with? Seems like they’re reporting the facts
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-2009-buying-stocks-is-a-potentially-good-deal-2015-6
rando says
Many Americans held still hold dismal views of Mr. Obama too, but the NY Times would absolutely never print such a statement. Why is that?
1. They forgot to check their 401K statements.
2. They think America is a "shithole" country.
3. Trump succeeds where Obama failed. Denial.
FortWayne saysI saw Democratic response. It was just a colossal whining in comparison.
I did not even bother to watch their response. Not worth the time.
Where did Obama fail, but Trump succeeded?
Everything Trumpcucks are touting as success is merely a continuation of Obamas success
errc saysWhich part do you disagree with? Seems like they’re reporting the facts
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-2009-buying-stocks-is-a-potentially-good-deal-2015-6
Obama gets credit for preventing a depression.
Trump gets credit for a full recovery, and the coming boom.
It's as simple as that. Lets be honest.
I wish people would stop repeating the propaganda so i can stop defending Obama with the simplest of truths. Reality shouldn’t clash with your view of the world so violently.
I just have a nagging duty to protect the truth.
Obama failed to bring the economy to full recovery and boom. Trump is succeeding here.
By what metric?
Obama was a miserable failure here.
Obama failed to bring the economy to full recovery and boom. Trump is succeeding here.
By what metric?
ISIS. Obama was a miserable failure here. Even the Russians did better.
By what metric?
North Korea. Obama did nothing. He could not even stop the Chinese from supporting them.
By what metric?
Obama gets credit for preventing a depression.
Trump gets credit for a full recovery, and the coming boom.
It's as simple as that. Lets be honest.
Well if we’re being honest here, it looks like The S&P tripled under Obama. It looks like it’s up about 27% under Trump.
Outside of emotional feelZ by the Trumpcucks, i dont see a break in the trend line, nor any action by Trump that warrants crediting Trump with Obamas economy.
What are you seeing
errc says
Why did ya cut that chart off at 2015??
errc saysI wish people would stop repeating the propaganda so i can stop defending Obama with the simplest of truths. Reality shouldn’t clash with your view of the world so violently.
If truth and reality is so important, how about overlaying what REALLY made that market rise under Obama:
Without multiple rounds of QE injected, that market would have flatlined. Obama had NOTHING to do with the rise.
Proof, here is the DOW chart for Obama's last two years, after QE was shut off:
...
Strategist sayserrc saysObama gets credit for preventing a depression.
Trump gets credit for a full recovery, and the coming boom.
It's as simple as that. Lets be honest.
Well if we’re being honest here, it looks like The S&P tripled under Obama. It looks like it’s up about 27% under Trump.
Look at your own chart again. Where was the S&P when Obama became President? You are not being honest by calculating the gains from the lows during Obama's term.
errc saysOutside of emotional feelZ by the Trumpcucks, i dont see a break in the trend line, nor any action by Trump that warrants crediting Trump with Obamas economy.
What are you seeing
I'm seeing a chart posted by you that does not ev...
So you show a chart until June 2015, from which you claim Trump did an inferior job compared to Obama, even though Trump became President in 2017.
ROFL. Based on your chart, Trump may not have even been born.
Gosh Errc, if you want to be deceptive, please show something that is not so easy to piss on.
If someone gets shot, and the response is "He’s a Piece of Shit", that sounds very much like a justification for the shooting.
It's basically continued Obama growth.
Only the most brainwashed partisans left of the isle give credit to Obama for this.
Rise and fall. ISIS rose under Obama. Pretty much destroyed under Trump.
Strategist sayserrc saysWhich part do you disagree with? Seems like they’re reporting the facts
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-2009-buying-stocks-is-a-potentially-good-deal-2015-6
Obama gets credit for preventing a depression.
Trump gets credit for a full recovery, and the coming boom.
It's as simple as that. Lets be honest.
Well if we’re being honest here, it looks like The S&P tripled under Obama. It looks like it’s up about 27% under Trump.
Outside of emotional feelZ by the Trumpcucks, i dont see a break in the trend line, nor any action by Trump that warrants credi...
The market has shown a complete change in environment from the Obama admin.
Among speech watchers!
Are you saying that you do not differentiate between the stock market and the economy (GDP/jobs/etc.)?
errc saysStrategist sayserrc saysWhich part do you disagree with? Seems like they’re reporting the facts
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-2009-buying-stocks-is-a-potentially-good-deal-2015-6
Obama gets credit for preventing a depression.
Trump gets credit for a full recovery, and the coming boom.
It's as simple as that. Lets be honest.
Well if we’re being honest here, it looks like The S&P tripled under Obama. It looks like it’s up about 27% under Trump.
Outside of emotional feelZ by the Trumpcucks, ...
What is disingenuous about showing where the stock market was when Obama took office and how it performed under his presidency?
Do you define disingenuous as meaning you don’t like the reality that is showed in the image?
In my book, disingenuous is claiming Obama failed where Trump succeeded. I’ve been banging this drum throughout Trumps presidency. Show any graph of the metric Trump is claiming as his own win, and it’s the exact same trend line. You can hardly tell that the presidency changed hands.
This is getting tiring, i can’t tell if you guys are being honest or not
« First « Previous Comments 129 - 168 of 202 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,245,129 comments by 14,870 users - Booger, goofus, stereotomy online now