patrick.net

Homeboy says

Threatening me with physical violence is a crime. You are digging a deeper and
deeper hole for yourself.

Where did he threaten physical violence? Saying he would love to meet you in real life? That's a bit of a stretch...

Stuttering is a hallmark trait of "a cowardly little bitch"..

egads101 says

I would honestly love to meet you in real life. in real life, and I can tell from your posting that you are a little cowardly bitch, in real life.

egads101 says

He'd beat your ass just as easily as I would.

Hey, physical threats not allowed here. In fact, they are a major crime and I will happily report everything I know to the police if they ask me.

Actually, egads101 is now banned for this:

"I would honestly love to meet you in real life. I would enjoy punching the ever loving shit out of you, in real life,"

Actually, egads101 is now banned for this:

"I would honestly love to meet you in real life. I would enjoy punching the ever loving shit out of you, in real life,"

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

Actually, egads101 is now banned for this:

"I would honestly love to meet you in real life. I would enjoy punching the ever loving shit out of you, in real life,"

Professor banned from online website!!

Bigsby says

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

baiting = legal

physical threat = felony

http://www.shouselaw.com/criminal_threats.html

Bigsby says

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

baiting = legal

physical threat = felony

And I suspect that this particular threat wouldn't hold much water in a court of law: "conditional threats are true threats if their context reasonably conveys to the victim that they are intended." Doesn't seem too likely when directed at an anonymous internet troll...

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many potential candidates.

People bait him all the time. Homeboy being an obvious trolling example. Clearly he goes over the top but he gets shit all the time. And come on Call it Crazy, you don't half post up some complete bloody bollocks on here, so it's a bit rich for you to pop up and start crowing.
And I'm not quite sure what half of you on here will do with him gone. You've killed the goose...

Homeboy says

You don't get it. Calling me names is one thing. Threatening me with physical violence is a crime. You are digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself.

Damn, what a whiny pussy.

Call it Crazy says

Bigsby says

People bait him all the time.

People bait other people here all the time.... How many other posters go off the deep end with their responses like he does??? His responses aren't normal.....

He's had years on here getting it constantly. Who else gets that? Who else had a phone threat made to their place of work?

Call it Crazy says

Bigsby says

Clearly he goes over the top but he gets shit all the time.

He gets shit BECAUSE he goes over the top....

People go fishing for it all the time, you included.

Call it Crazy says

I admit, I post different articles to get people to comment, but isn't that what Patnet is, a place to share and debate different topics??

Come on. It's a bit more than posting a few different articles to get people commenting.

Bigsby says

And I'm not quite sure what half of you on here will do with him gone. You've killed the goose...

Bobby will come back, he can't stand to stay away.
Unless Patrick blocks his ip address...

Patrick.net is more precise, wittier, leaner and faster without all the profanity clogging up the wires. You guys can open your own website with a (literally!) 'explicit' platform for the kung-fu fighting housing mogul. But it's nice to see some libertarian spirit on this board questioning government overreach - not that these moments of clarity will last long with today's 'progressives' ;)

Call it Crazy says

With responses like he made to Homeboy??? And you're defending him for that type of response??

Really??

Is threatening someone with physical harm because of some typed comments acceptable by you??

Really??

That response was a bit much, but it was made to an anonymous internet troll, so do you really take that seriously? Come on. And what about Homeboy's repeated 'rich spoiled fuck' comment? Quite honestly, Homeboy has been pushing it for quite some time.

turtledove says

this site is supposed to be an intelligent discussion where people from different vantage points discuss relevant topics.

You must be reading a different forum to me. It seems to be almost entirely populated by conspiracy freaks, racists, ultra right-wing loons and unhinged anti-Obama nuts these days. Oh, and gold bugs.

Bobby has his own website, but he never would let comments through that he disagreed with.
So naturally, no one posts there. And explains why he was always here.

What I just wrote will drive Bobby crazy. He will try everything he can to come back and deny what I wrote is true.

Bobby...
Are your guts twisting in a knot trying to resist coming back??
This reminds me of the Star Trek scene where Spok gets sprayed with the flower spores that gave him emotions. Spok would grit his teeth and chant "I am in control of my emotions!" over and over again. That is what I imagine Bobby is doing now. "I will resist coming back to Patrick.net!"

Bigsby says

You must be reading a different forum to me. It's almost entirely populated by conspiracy freaks, racists, ultra ring-wing loons and unhinged anti-Obama nuts these days.

And everyone of them is entitled to his or her opinion. It shouldn't cause people to lose their minds because of what someone says (someone you DON'T even know). They are just words. My power is in the upper right corner of my computer screen. I can click on that "X" any time I feel like it.

turtledove says

Bigsby says

You must be reading a different forum to me. It's almost entirely populated by conspiracy freaks, racists, ultra ring-wing loons and unhinged anti-Obama nuts these days.

And everyone of them is entitled to his or her opinion. It shouldn't cause people to lose their minds because of what someone says (someone you DON'T even know). They are just words. My power is in the upper right corner of my computer screen. I can click on that "X" any time I feel like it.

Maybe, though the world would be a much better place without some of the opinions expressed on this forum. And entitlement to an opinion doesn't equate to 'intelligent discussion.'

Bigsby says

turtledove says

this site is supposed to be an intelligent discussion where people from different vantage points discuss relevant topics.

You must be reading a different forum to me. It seems to be almost entirely populated by conspiracy freaks, racists, ultra right-wing loons and unhinged anti-Obama nuts these days.

Right on, the same loons who incessantly bash George "Zimfuck" Zimmerman for (and denying him the right to) using violence after being pinned to the ground under a brutal beatdown, but then are totally ok with going apeshit and advocating violence against someone who had the audacity to disagree with them on a web forum! Oh wait, that was somebody else.. ;)

Or simply the people who post blatantly racist and homophobic comments on here without any consequence. How about them for starters?
And I'm glad you know exactly what happened to George Zimmerman on that night. He certainly comes across as a likeable chap. Wouldn't hurt a fly...

Bigsby says

Or simply the people who post blatantly racist and homophobic comments on here without any consequence. How about them for starters?

And I'm glad you know exactly what happened to George Zimmerman on that night. He certainly comes across as a likeable chap. Wouldn't hurt a fly...

That is irrelevant. I don't have to like GZ. The definition of racism is subject to interpretation and without any further calls to harm the group of people targeted by what you perceive as racism those comments are protected by freedom of speech. This may be hard to swallow for some but it is the only way to prevent governments from hijacking morality and turning into an oppressive Orwellian fascist state.

mell says

Bigsby says

Or simply the people who post blatantly racist and homophobic comments on here without any consequence. How about them for starters?

And I'm glad you know exactly what happened to George Zimmerman on that night. He certainly comes across as a likeable chap. Wouldn't hurt a fly...

That is irrelevant. I don't have to like GZ. The definition of racism is subject to interpretation and without any further calls to harm the group of people targeted by what you perceive as racism those comments are protected by freedom of speech. This may be hard to swallow for some but it is the only way to prevent governments from hijacking morality and turning into an oppressive Orwellian fascist state.

A good number of posts I've read on here aren't subject to too much interpretation. They have been blatantly racist or homophobic. And your supposed right to freedom of speech has plenty of restrictions. It doesn't seem to have turned the US into an 'oppressive Orwellian fascist state' despite what some on this forum like to think.

Most people don't support homophobia or racism. But this is a public forum. Racists and homophobes do, in fact, have the right to say things no matter how foul most of us would find those words to be. The line is crossed at threatening to hurt another person.

I wish I didn't have to read idiocy, too. But I don't feel that I have the right to determine the rule book of what others are allowed to think and feel. It is not illegal for a person to hate gay people. IMHO, it's a waste of their energy. I might tell them that I don't appreciate their words; I can try to help them appreciate a different way of looking at things.... But that's the extent of what any of us can do.

Personally, I wish many of you would dispense with some of the language used on this site. It's as if you think that continuously dropping the F-bomb impacts the credibility of your argument. A few months ago, my nine-year-old daughter came up behind me while I was reading a thread on patnet and said, "mommy, that's the F-word." I shouldn't have to shield my computer screen from my kids as if I were watching porn. Now, that's my opinion, and I'm entitled to it. The best part of all is.... You have the right to disagree with me.

Bigsby says

You know perhaps Roberto wouldn't be so irritated as to make that remark if you didn't repeatedly call someone with his stated background a 'rich spoiled fuck.' Did you think he would be best pleased by that? Would you if you were him?

You're being dishonest again. You know perfectly well he called me much, much worse things than that, many more times. In fact I was very restrained compared to the heaps and heaps of gratuitous insults and profanity he was throwing in my direction. Do I need to quote all the nasty names he called me? The difference is, I do not threaten someone with physical violence "in real life" just because they called me nasty names on the internet. Honestly, what's not to understand here?

Bigsby says

Oh, by the way Homeboy, I can see your posts if I don't log on.

Wow. So you announced that you were done here, but then came back to troll me some more. Then you announced that you were putting me on ignore, but you log out just to read and respond to my posts.

Can you say, "obsessed"?

Bigsby says

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

Baiting? Look at some of the things you and Roberto were writing in this thread:

"seriously, you are a fucking loser. and a moron

Flunk life much?

are you, in real life, as fucking stupid as you are on here?

you are continuing to be an arsehole

You really are an arrogant so-and-so. Let me guess, you're in your 20s, think you are super duper intelligent, dislike your job, and are wondering why life has dealt you a crappy hand. Is that right? Or perhaps you'd care to explain why it is you're such a petulant and arrogant individual.

You are clearly a rather tiresome and extraordinarily arrogant arsehole"

I mean, really Bigsby. Who was doing the baiting?

Bigsby says

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many potential candidates.

If this is supposed to be some sort of veiled accusation, you can kiss my ass, Bigsby. I was barely aware of Roberto's existence; I just remember he was that guy who got in fights all the time and bragged about his Arizona investments. I didn't even know egads was the same person until someone pointed it out here. You can see in this thread where I came to the realization that it was Roberto, and my surprise that all the time he had been talking about real estate in Arizona rather than California like the rest of us. I don't threaten people in real life, not only because it is a crime, but because it is wrong. I didn't do it here, even though you classy gentlemen were calling me a "pussy" and trying to egg me on. Roberto didn't like it when it happened to him, but he doesn't seem to mind doing it to others. If you are accusing me of something, you ought to think long and hard about that, because you too are in danger of crossing a line.

You seem to suffer from the same emotional fragility as Roberto, although thankfully not to the same degree. If you are considering falsely accusing someone of a crime to get revenge because your feelings were hurt on an internet forum, you might need to step away from the computer.

50 bigsby, not a measly 13...but the big Five O.
Think of all the quadrillian quid you'd be swimmin in come taxtime if you boyz had figured out it was suicide marchin 100 wide into battle 'stead of tree hoppin like the victorious bluebloods of yesteryear!

Bigsby says

So, yes, you're probably right, I could and should find another forum less populated by racists and conspiracists. Perhaps I'm just used to the familiar. I'll have a look round or better still find something more constructive to do with my time.

Is this a come on or a felony.
Homeboy says

Bigsby says

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many potential candidates.

If this is supposed to be some sort of veiled accusation, you can kiss my ass, Bigsby

What's the truth? egads = Roberto?

I don't think there's ever a need to degenerate a debate into personal insults whether it's politics or real estate. Arguments can be done in good faith whether they are based on opinions or documented evidence.

Perhaps this was discussed somewhere else, but how do we know that someone made a threatening phone call to Roberto? I know he said someone did, but do we know this actually happened? Are the police involved? Have they been able to check the phone records?

turtledove says

made a threatening phone call to Roberto?

Some vindictive whimp apparently called his employer.
Mind you this is instead of just hitting the "ignore" button and carrying on.

Bigsby says

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

baiting = legal

physical threat = felony

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many people to choose from.
And I suspect that this particular threat wouldn't hold much water in a court of law: "conditional threats are true threats if their context reasonably conveys to the victim that they are intended." Doesn't seem too likely when directed at an anonymous internet troll...

Robert Sproul says

turtledove says

made a threatening phone call to Roberto?

Some vindictive whimp apparently called his employer.

Mind you this is instead of just hitting the "ignore" button and carrying on.

Clearly, the person making the phone call has a few screws loose.

But if I'm understanding everything correctly, Roberto's employer received a threatening phone call directed at Roberto. Roberto then proceeded to have his screen name and all posts under that screen name erased by Patrick. Roberto then comes back as Egads, admitting he is, in fact, Roberto.

I'm with him right up to the point that he comes back as Egads and admits he's Roberto. I'm assuming the reason he had his original screen name and posts removed from the site is because he felt threatened by a lunatic and didn't want to take chances learning what the lunatic might be capable of. I would have done the same thing in his situation.

Where he loses me is why he would come back as Egads and openly continue the Roberto cause. Either he felt threatened by the lunatic or he didn't. If he felt threatened (threatened enough to want to erase his old identity) why on Earth would he advertise that Egads and Roberto are one and the same?

turtledove says

Either he felt threatened by the lunatic or he didn't. If he felt threatened (threatened enough to want to erase his old identity) why on Earth would he advertise that Egads and Roberto are one and the same?

I am given to understand that it was HE that was portrayed as the threat, armed and crazy, etc.
To his employer, by some rodent from this site.
I would guess he came back because he THRIVES on the fray.
He never acknowledged the Roberto/egads link but he has a persona that is hard to disguise.

Bigsby says

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many people to choose from.

And I suspect that this particular threat wouldn't hold much water in a court of law: "conditional threats are true threats if their context reasonably conveys to the victim that they are intended." Doesn't seem too likely when directed at an anonymous internet troll...

Ha ha. I knew you'd be back, Bigsby. How many times have you given us a goodbye speech now? Three? Just couldn't stay away; had to come back and level your lame false accusation once again. You are one angry dude.

turtledove says

If he felt threatened (threatened enough to want to erase his old identity) why on Earth would he advertise that Egads and Roberto are one and the same?

I don't think he was that worried about the phone call. I think he was just switching screen names to be a more effective troll. Didn't he switch it from "Oracle" to "Egads" while keeping the same avatar? If he were worried about people finding out who he was, I don't think he'd keep the same avatar.

Bigsby says

Bigsby says

You should take a good look at the constant baiting coming from Homeboy in thread after thread to give it a bit of context.

baiting = legal

physical threat = felony

And someone phoned up his place of work, and.... We're still in the dark about who that was from this website. There can't be that many people to choose from.

And I suspect that this particular threat wouldn't hold much water in a court of law: "conditional threats are true threats if their context reasonably conveys to the victim that they are intended." Doesn't seem too likely when directed at an anonymous internet troll...

Why are you trying to instigate a website witch hunt?