Thread for orphaned comments
invite response
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm 187,099 views 117,730 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 40,625 - 40,664 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Japan has this same problem. Totally crap land (no services, no schools) an hour+ out from the city center is priced at $1M per acre, thanks to the lack of supply and their very low interest rates (~2%) and land value taxes (~1%).
As a country, Japan does not have land shortage. Much of the land in Northern Japan is practically empty. Fully 1/4 of the entire Japanese population live in the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan area because they have a crony capitalist economy, where one's financial success depends on proximity to the political power center.
What's happening in SFBA is that with low inventory, the technocrats get first dibs. A couple both working as google software engineering for example can easily make 240K base and with bonuses/options, over/under is 300K
employers, dont keep operations in the SFBA or hire locally, they move out to
greener pastures.... and its all too easy given many other cities/states are more
than willing to provide incentives.
So SFBA home prices and rents go up.. and we all loose our jobs... look around
what is happening !
"What we hear time after time from CEOs as well as frontline employees is how incredibly difficult it is to come here and stay here. That truly does have an impact on a company's bottom line when the cost differential is so much higher here than it is in other regions around the state, nation and globe, or the ability to recruit top talent is also impacted.....Hewlett-Packard and Dell are the top two computer-makers in the world. Corporate headquarters for HP are located in Palo Alto and Dell is in Round Rock, Texas. Obviously, they both have people and facilities around the globe.
In those two communities where their corporate headquarters are and where a lot of research and development takes place, the median resale price for a home in Palo Alto is about $1.6 million. In Round Rock, Texas, it's about $180,000, except the home and property are bigger.
We hear from HP all the time that a huge deterrent to the ability to recruit and retain people anywhere near Silicon Valley is the housing issue. We don't hear that from Dell, which is also a member company, about their operations in Round Rock. It does continue to plague us and we will continue to sound the alarm."
Bellingham Bill
2013 Dec 20, 12:25pm
"So what do you think land price should be per acre?"
enough to make sure people who need access to more land aren't priced out by the people who are hoarding it.
One mechanism to make this calibration is uptax over-median land values, especially commercial and unoccupied land.
Carrying cost on 40 nice wooded acres 10 minutes out of Santa Cruz would be more than $1000/mo, I'll tell you that.
I'd also untax the fixed improvements entirely. It's fucking retarded that we penalize people who build new supply that way, and reward (via Prop 13) those who don't.
I don't have any problem with people profiting from the creation and management of new supply.
What I have a problem with is the way things have devolved over the decades.
One way to fix that would be for gov't to forcibly increase the supply of quality housing where it is needed*, though just upzoning everywhere to permit more density would also work I guess.
* this would require we have a gov't more like the nordic eurosocialist paradises and less like the government that gave us the 1950s cheap-ass public housing disasters.
I don't see sfba house prices lessening unless tech sector experiences massive layoffs.
over the past 10-13 years we shifted more jobs out of state... no massive layoffs were noticed.. today, only 5% are locally vs 90-95% not in SFBA...
overall, we lost lots of well know companies since the "zenith" of global the spending.
Larry Ellison ... "We saw the zenith in tech jobs around 2001. We saw a point where half of all capital spending was tech. That will never happen again. My industry will never come back. Nor should it. Computer systems are still too expensive. They're too labor intensive."
http://www.sfgate.com/business/ontherecord/article/On-the-Record-Larry-Ellison-2590921.php#page-6
Bellingham Bill
2013 Dec 20, 12:36pm
" Fully 1/4 of the entire Japanese population live in the Greater Tokyo Metropolitan area because they have a crony capitalist economy, where one's financial success depends on proximity to the political power center."
This is not how 'mother cities' function, actually.
The analog for Tokyo would be New York, not DC.
(The US heartland -- Know Nothings and Populists -- rallied against "East Coast Bankers" not DC in the 19th century)
Japan's gov't expense is a LOT lower than ours, btw. Defense is $47B. Their infamous 'public works' is all of $52B, with $60B under "Miscellaneous".
Dominant costs are social spending -- $290B, and interest on the debt, $100B.
With the way their non-proportional representation is, a lot of money flows AWAY from Tokyo, back to the rural areas. Tokyo gets it all back of course, since that's where all the corporations and wealthy are.
Bellingham Bill
2013 Dec 20, 12:50pm
"the same about prime NYC real estate in the 1980's, only to be massacred in the early 1990's"
the main deal with Japan's asset collapse was that they were leveraging stocks with bubble land values and buying land based on margin secured by inflated stock valuations. This was all a cross-default collapse waiting to happen, and boy did it ever hit them in the 1990s, making them distressed sellers in a down market.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/NIKKEI225
They were in no position to weather the 1990-1994 downturn, though if they could have held on, they would have been OK by 1999.
They paid $800M for Pebble Beach in 1990, $50B in deals in total in that bubble period.
Japan now has a NIIP of $2.5T. They're doing OK, probably just laugh at their bad timing now.
The analog for Tokyo would be New York, not DC.
Tokyo is Japan's New York and DC wrapped into one. It became that way because it became their DC hundreds of years ago, when the primary Japanese commerce center was not Tokyo but Osaka (their equivalent of NYC back then). Nowadays, even a sattelite city in the Greater Tokyo Metropolis, like Yokohama, is more populated than Osaka. That's crony market intervention in action.
enough to make sure people who need access to more land aren't priced out by the people who are hoarding it.
Do you think any bum should be able to homestead on your lawn? or the patch of woods giving you privacy from your neighbor?
One mechanism to make this calibration is uptax over-median land values, especially commercial and unoccupied land.
Whatever "uptax" or "over-median land value" means, you do realize that would have consequences on land valuation, right? Regulations like what you are proposing would actually reduce transaction, not increasing it like you are hoping.
Carrying cost on 40 nice wooded acres 10 minutes out of Santa Cruz would be more than $1000/mo, I'll tell you that.
I thought the League of Conservationist idea is to keep as much land nicely wooded as possible, instead of becoming developers' playground.
I'd also untax the fixed improvements entirely. It's fucking retarded that we penalize people who build new supply that way, and reward (via Prop 13) those who don't.
I don't have any problem with people profiting from the creation and management of new supply.
While I can sympathize with what you are saying, I hope you do realize why the current system is what it is: the primary goal of any tax system is to maximize tax revenue while minimize enforcement cost.
One way to fix that would be for gov't to forcibly increase the supply of quality housing where it is needed*, though just upzoning everywhere to permit more density would also work I guess.
You are presuming that government bureaucrats magically know where housing is needed. If they knew that for certain, they'd be developers instead of government bureaucrats.
* this would require we have a gov't more like the nordic eurosocialist paradises and less like the government that gave us the 1950s cheap-ass public housing disasters.
Yada yada, must be all those colored people messing up a good thing again. In case you did not realize, Sweden was saved from a full socialist collapse only because it was a country of 10million people hence much more manageable and responsive than a mega state of 300million.
"If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance, unless it's a crap policy, then you can't keep your insurance, but now you CAN keep your insurance"........
What comes next???
at what part does this Lie become Gross Negligence...
Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both.
Gloria to selling designer blue jeans and accessories
they were the rage of the Disco era 70s..
especially them sexy high school girls
i knew... man did they look good !
You would have seen the fact that many people from NYC had moved into Sandy Hook prior to the hoax.
Sandy Hook has a population less then 2000 people. How "many" people could have possibly moved there from NYC? Did you want to order a hat?
Silicon Valley has been reaching its tentacles into San Francisco for some time now,
what was once Silicon Valley is long long gone... the people today have no idea
where or how SV got its start or anything.. they are just mindless drones unable
fathom why they are here...
so called techies is a perversion... senseless idiots who program web sites...
No one is really interested in having a real tech center anymore... it icky stuff.
This video is just a small part of SV history... comes close to the kind of people that made it happen.
Why Santa Clara County... Cheap Land ! thats all.. just cheap land !
Bigsby
2013 Dec 20, 6:40pm
You lazy ass. You didn't look at the video. You would have seen the fact that many people from NYC had moved into Sandy Hook prior to the hoax. You would have seen that the Wyatt girl had the picture of another girl as hers, and that after that was revealed because the other mother complained, the Wyatts dropped out of sight, except for their donation site.
Had you watched the video you would have seen that many of these Zionist folks became very active in their pursuit of gun control. One gal used the exact same hyperventilation method of finding her emotion, without tears of course, that was employed by Robbie Parker.
The comparison is so creepy as to give even you, pause. But you never saw it because you were beating your thingy instead of studying. You are Peter Venkman.
Let me get this straight. You believe that the entire town was shipped in from NYC (presumably the training ground for thousands of non-Jewish zionist actors). Is that right?
You really are stark raving bonkers.
tatupu70
2013 Dec 20, 9:29pm
No it doesnt ... shows the opposite
Could you provide some evidence or data to back up that statement?
Sure, some powers are non-monetizable. So what? My wife can get me to fix the toilet. How exactly does that contradict the well established relationship between wealth disparity and economic health?
There is no such "well established relationship" between the two across different countries. North Korea has much lower nominal wealth disparity than the US; few would argue their economy is heathier than ours, outside of North Korea. LOL.
Again--so what? POTUS is very powerful. Probably moreso than his wealth indicates.
That's the point that I was making. The amount of money/asset a person owns does not represent the total amount of power he/she wields; there is little correlation between the two when analysing across different societal context. So "wealth disparity" is a distraction, when the real imbalance in a society is Power Disparity.
It's useless because noise far outweigh signal
No--actually it doesn't. The data is pretty clear and unambiguous. The signal far outweighs the noise.
You need to prove how North Korea's Kim's $1000/yr or so salary conveys more signal than noise.
Furthermore, your observation that "too high" in our society leading to busts is essentially agreeing to my point that busts are corrective mechanisms in our relatively capitalistic free market economy, and busts are leveling! So why do your ilk want the government to intervene and stop busts?
You're kidding, right?
Why? Busts are leveling events. When you allow government bureaucrats to interfere, who do you think the government bureaucrats tend to help more? Their friends in the establishment of course!
Tenpoundbass
2013 Dec 21, 12:35am
Clown boy aint so funny now is he?
Notice his approval has slipped since his Defjam comedy tours don't wow and dazzle people anymore. Now that they know how he is in practice. His humorous road maps chocked full of GOP zings and quips, and always punctuate by how bad Bush was and how much of a mess he left after every promise, schtick doesn't pack the peanut gallery anymore.
Do you think he could pack the national mall, with millions of people clamoring to hear his lies today?
Someone deleting all my posts again... Everyone just look under my comments to read them... its annoying when someone keeps deleting all my posts...
Banks shouldn't lend to a public that cannot pay back the loans. But they will lend to RE investment firms that have walked away from loans. Why the double standard?
HydroCabron
2013 Dec 21, 3:20am
Oh, and there was at least one guy who was already active in gun control. Watch the video, NWO Brit, Bigsby.
Whoa - a seed agent!
Gun control advocates are a truly rare occurrence!
Banks shouldn't lend to a public that cannot pay back the loans.
the buyer were the ones who overbid and wanted to overpay...
they are the party who overpriced homes... why would they
wrongly believe a typical 200K home was actually worth paying
500-600K...
On The SF Peninsula, add in record low inventories. It is absolutely insane to see a city of 100k (San Mateo) with only 15 SFHs for sale. Low supply = higher prices. Not to mention rents are insanely high (again, in desirable areas) so the rent vs buy ratios are still good for buying.
pocket listing are now 25% of inventory sold.. so there is 33% additional unlisted inventory (MLSlisting) available in No Calif. Clearly this is having a problem ! Who know how deep the problem may go in places like San Mateo... could be half are unlisted...
California Association Warns About 'Pocket Listings' | Realtor ...
realtormag.realtor.org › News & Commentary › Daily News‎
Jun 27, 2013 - About 1-in-4 home sales are reportedly pocket listings in some Northern California markets, and the California Association of REALTORS
Pocket Listings webinar recording and slides - California ...
www.car.org › Newsstand > › News >‎
Pocket Listings webinar recording and slides ... In case you missed it, C.A.R. recently hosted its first Hot Topics webinar, “The Pressing Issue of Pocket Listings. ... gain a clear understanding of how pocket listings are affecting REALTORS
Also, the GDP is on fire right now (over 4% growth). If that holds, the economy continues to improve, and unemployment continues to drop, that will also drive house prices (and inflation in general) higher.
we are nowhere near 4% or even 3%....at best only half of that at 2%....
Fed officials do see economic growth and the labor market gathering more strength next year, though the forecast is little changed from September. U.S. gross domestic product is expected to advance between 2.8% to 3.2% in 2014, versus September’s projection of 2.9% to 3.1% growth. The unemployment rate is now expected to average between 6.3% and 6.6% during the fourth quarter of the year, compared with an earlier range of 6.4% and 6.8%.
The policymakers say the economy will grow between 2.2% and 2.3% for all of 2013. Through the first three quarters of 2013, the economy has grown at a 2.4% annual rate. Private forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers said the economy should nearly maintain that pace in the fourth quarter
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2013/12/18/fed-projections-see-no-rate-increase-until-2015/
marcus
2013 Dec 21, 4:33am
I believe this article is accurate.
This is the first sentence of a blog post that bgamall calls an "article."
It is time to call out the scumbags who historically have been mostly responsible for promoting gun control legislation in what have been obvious attempts to destroy the Second Amendment.
I mean honestly, wtf ?
We knew how stupid you are. And we knew that the emotional /pschological problems run strong with you. But Jesus !
Is it going to keep getting worse until the holidays are over ?
Do you ever have a redeeming moment when you say,..."wow, I really am fucked in the head." Ever ??
Once the ACA finishes kicking in, will you please consider looking in to medication ?
HydroCabron
2013 Dec 21, 4:52am
Gun control advocates are a truly rare occurrence!
Gun control advocates that are Zionists are very prevalent. http://ronabbass.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/its-mainly-zionist-jews-pushing-for-gun-control-in-the-usa/
I believe this article is accurate. And I believe that it is as the Jewish hero Shahak has said, once the Zionists subdue the middle east they will be coming after America.
I was blind, but now I see.
I had thought that these people were trying to minimize the incidence of people putting holes in other people in schools, movie theaters, offices, and homes.
Turns out the whole thing is on behalf of the State of Israel.
bullshitmagnet
2013 Dec 21, 5:24am
NOT with adequate maintenance, especially in California's mild climate.
(Tokyo and Houston are different stories)
by they go out of style, and newer homes are better.
Nope! Location, Location, Location still rules. All the best locations were platted before I was born.
The new in-fill homes in Sunnyvale are total crap compared to the older stock that's as old as me. A house is largely concrete, sticks and bricks, the insides can be updated for pennies a month, more or less.
Here's a house built in 1950 totally refurbd:
http://www.redfin.com/CA/Salinas/229-San-Miguel-Ave-93901/home/14955872
And there are some cars still around from the 1950's as well, that have been refurbished and are running like new. So would you advocate that we all invest in a parking lot full of cars?
bullshitmagnet
2013 Dec 21, 5:36am
we are nowhere near 4% or even 3%....at best only half of that at 2%....
Incorrect. That last report I saw showed GDP for the latest quarter being revised upward to 4.1%. Interest rates are headed higher.
anotheraccount
2013 Dec 21, 5:38am
Incorrect. That last report I saw showed GDP for the latest quarter being revised upward to 4.1%. Interest rates are headed higher.
That's 4.1 annualized. That means the economy grew 1.025% for that quarter. It does not mean that it grew at that rate Q1, Q2, or will in Q4.
anotheraccount
2013 Dec 21, 6:20am
One of the reasons why higher interest rates may not be making as much impact in coastal California is that many qualified buyers are switching to 5 year arms. The rates on those are practically the same as 30 year fixed mortgages were at the lowest.
I think this is a point that SFAce was arguing quite a bit and he is probably right on this.
On the other hand, places like Vegas and Phoenix are impacted more as there are more institutional investors for whom the rates make a much bigger difference.
marcus
2013 Dec 21, 6:51am
So, above, we have a website link, and a video saying that you must hyperventilate like Robbie Parker did to fake a cry. The middle video says don't force crying or you will be shown to be a fake!
How much more proof does anyone need that Robbie Parker was a phony and Sandy Hook was a hoax?
Okay, on to ignore with you, you fucking pathetic little turd.
So you just find out the guys last name and now you know that he is a Zionist worm, working with dark forces, every thought is malevolent, he cares not for this world. Worse still, he's gay.
Hmmmm, I guess that blows the "rates don't matter" argument.... There's a one
point spread between the 30 year and 5/1 ARM...
They can't afford the current house prices or payments with a standard, 30
year loan, so they are moving to more "creative" ways to purchase...
What's next, the return of sub-prime or NINJA???
Wasn't that one of the main problems that contributed to the previous bubble.............incomes could not afford 30 year loans so other creative loans were originated to fool the eye.
Why don't we have 1 year ARM loans starting at 1%, then the payments are really affordable.
Wasn't that one of the main problems that contributed to the previous bubble.............incomes could not afford 30 year loans so other creative loans were originated to fool the eye.
No payment till next year would be creative as well, but we all have seen these loans
for many applicance and furniture stores in the prior decade. No one was fooled by it.. it was obvious.
They can't afford the current house prices or payments with a standard, 30 year loan, so they are moving to more "creative" ways to purchase...
What's next, the return of sub-prime or NINJA???
seems that way again.. but of course restamped and reapproved by Govt.. since now the govt controls 90% of the market.
Shaman
2013 Dec 21, 9:43am
One of the reasons why higher interest rates may not be making as much impact in coastal California is that many qualified buyers are switching to 5 year arms. The rates on those are practically the same as 30 year fixed mortgages were at the lowest.
Hmmmm, I guess that blows the "rates don't matter" argument.... There's a one point spread between the 30 year and 5/1 ARM...
They can't afford the current house prices or payments with a standard, 30 year loan, so they are moving to more "creative" ways to purchase...
What's next, the return of sub-prime or NINJA???
Seems crazy, but the buyers here are vastly more qualified nowadays, no gardeners and housekeepers buying $600,000 3/2 SFRs. Lots of money down and intent to take advantage of short term interest rates as a strategy for managing investment rather than losers trying to buy what they will never be able to actually afford. Lemme tell ya, the losers aren't even getting past the bid process here. Strongest offer of the strongest buyers go into escrow.
They can't afford the current house prices or payments with a standard, 30 year loan, so they are moving to more "creative" ways to purchase...
What's next, the return of sub-prime or NINJA???
seems that way again.. but of course restamped and reapproved by Govt.. since now the govt controls 90% of the market.
Lenders have to turn loans to make money, they will find a way.
« First « Previous Comments 40,625 - 40,664 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,925 comments by 14,891 users - Chris123, clambo, ivory, Misc, stereotomy online now