by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 46,900 - 46,939 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - Improving golfer
I think they should dig him up, give him falsies and a reality show.
You can always tell when there is Realtor saliva in your underwear. It feels like a combination of itching powder and a bad case of crab lice. You need rabies injections and a month of antibiotics.
I say 10,000 feet. That way they have time to consider their sins before going splat!
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.
Well the President of Gambia claims he has a cure for AIDS!!
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/anger-herbal-aids-cure-gambia-article-1.1231539
We haven't been putting the b-52's to much use lately.....
Of course substituting them for clay pigeons at the trap range wouldn't be a bad idea either......
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.
Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.
On the one hand, I don't trust that the recovery is real. On the other hand, I don't trust that fundamentals are going to impact prices anytime soon. So far, my rent hasn't gone through the moon, so at least I have that going for me.
If you wanted to be really gruesome, you could attach different lengths of piano wire to their fingers, toes, feet, hands, elbows etc. so that they flipped off on the way down, leaving only the gushing torso to hit the ground.
Then, you would also have a Realtor body parts piano wire mobile for your dungeon. Jeffrey Dahmer would be proud.
"They better get their act together or we all sink."
No ... maybe you should get 20% down, get your act together.
Qualified first time buyers should not be denied a loan due to a lack of down payment.
They did that before (pre 2008), 100% LTV, no down payment.
How did it work out last time??
Boy, you really have a short memory...
It will sink our economy into a black hole.
Where did the last black hole come from??
Unqualified borrowers.
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.
Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.
Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!
I have it on good authority that this is the correct procedure, although additional refinements have been applied, such as cacti.
I wonder if we know some of the same people...
Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.
Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!
Today it's even better. Ka ching Ka ching.
Hey, Isaac Newton was very in to alchemy, or at least so they say.
His excuse was that he was born in an era of ignorant, eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog near-total religious obscurantism, and, though he created a new era of understanding the world in terms of actual evidence, he kept one foot planted firmly in the old world.
But then, it is not surprising he was an asshole. He was, after all, a conservative.
Wow just tried this with my microwave and a fork and you could literally see the gold jumping off the utensil! Brb gotta get rich!
Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!
I guess Reagan/Bush policies kept working well into Clinton years..
of course when Clinton waltzed in Silicon Valley asking what Big Govt
could do.. the leaders here told him to go fuck himself... Seems there
wasnt anyone who dig what he wanted... Last trip he made to SFBA as
Prez... was strickly going to East Palo Alto schools..
Bottom line, Clinton did a rats ass to stimulate an economic growth.
Hey, Isaac Newton was very in to alchemy, or at least so they say.
His excuse was that he was born in an era of ignorant, eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog near-total religious obscurantism, and, though he created a new era of understanding the world in terms of actual evidence, he kept one foot planted firmly in the old world.
And who knows, maybe he was a skeptic, doing secret research on behalf of the government to confirm that the popular alchemy scams of the day were false.
(since the value of gold way such a key economic factor at that time - I'm sure the government would gladly hire the best minds to make sure that nobody was going to start making gold. )
Newton also was at one time a member of Parliament and later in charge of the royal mint. So to me the idea that his alchemy research was from a skeptical point of view (government research) makes some sense.
But either way, he was an interesting guy to be sure. Read about his occult theories and interests, and secret societies etc.
And who knows, maybe he was a skeptic, doing secret research on behalf of the government to confirm that the popular alchemy scams of the day were false.
(since the value of gold way such a key economic factor at that time - I'm sure the government would gladly hire the best minds to make sure that nobody was going to start making gold. )
Newton also was at one time a member of Parliament and in charge of the royal mint. So to me the idea that his alchemy research was from a skeptical point of view makes some sense.
But either way, he was an interesting guy to be sure. Read about his occult theories and interests, and secret societies etc.
Isaac Newton's studies preceded any meaningful advances in Chemistry as we know it today by 100 years. He was delving into the unknown. The man developed Calculus and Classical Mechanics. He also performed some groundbreaking research in optics. I'm pretty sure, the fact that he was testing chemical theory when the subject was still in his infantile stages cannot be held against him.
(since the value of gold way such a key economic factor at that time - I'm sure the government would gladly hire the best minds to make sure that nobody was going to start making gold. )
I'm pretty sure the government didn't give two flying fucks about that possibility back then.
I guess Reagan/Bush policies kept working well into Clinton years..
of course when Clinton waltzed in Silicon Valley asking what Big Govt
could do.. the leaders here told him to go fuck himself... Seems there
wasnt anyone who dig what he wanted... Last trip he made to SFBA as
Prez... was strickly going to East Palo Alto schools..
Bottom line, Clinton did a rats ass to stimulate an economic growth.
Har har. Are you for real?
Har har. Are you for real?
What great economic policies did Clinton enact to create a boom economy ?
and forget about balancing a budget.. that what Gingrich/GOP plan...
If anything, Clintons mismanagement led to the beginning of the a housing bubble.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html
Har har. Are you for real?
What great economic policies did Clinton enact to create a boom economy ?
and forget about balancing a budget.. that what Gingrich/GOP plan...
There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.
His only negative was having the hots for an intern, just like every other normal male on the planet.
There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.
What great economic plan did he have ? All of the plans for the recovery came from Bush R. which led to the job booms.
So what what that "reason" ? I bet you dont even know.
There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.
What great economic plan did he have ? All of the plans for the recovery came from Bush R. which led to the job booms.
You have a point there. A lot of it had to do with Reagan taming inflation.
By the same logic you cannot blame Obama for a bad economy.
Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????
Ronald Reagan was not a good president. I thought he was, but he signed into law liar loans that ended up destroying America after he passed away. I often wonder what he would have thought about that result of his actions to Thatcherize America.
It was because of the liar loans I got my first home, when I lied through my teeth. They did not cause the crash of 2008, it was the NINJA loans.
Should I be thanking Reagan to make it possible to get my first home?
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Optimal Altitude for Throwing Banksters and Realtors Out of Helicopters
Forget about the helicopters. Use high altitude balloons. Just don't go above 65 miles or the banksters will exceed terminal velocity and burn up on reentry denying us a nice splatter at the end.
Wow just tried this with my microwave and a fork and you could literally see the gold jumping off the utensil! Brb gotta get rich!
Was it a gold plated fork to begin with? That doesn't count :P
Nice to know that Kitco has the same opinion of Libertoonians that I do.
I'm pretty sure, the fact that he was testing chemical theory when the subject was still in his infantile stages cannot be held against him.
I'm well aware of most of the amazing accomplishments of Newton, including those related to pre- chemistry.
But he supposedly had an interest in alchemy. That's what the historians say. I was speculating that his interest might have been a skeptical interest that has been misinterpreted.
He was into the occult and interpreting ancient wisdom that was supposedly encoded in ancient architecture, and the bible, et. Many even today find interesting puzzles in the accomplishments of the ancients, such as in ancient egypt.
Look it up. The guy had some "out there" interests or hobbies or whatever you want to call them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton's_occult_studies
I'm pretty sure the government didn't give two flying fucks about that possibility back then.
Actually they had laws against alchemy. And based on the "science" of the time, and Rosecrucian (sp?) rumors about alchemy, which might have simply been manipulation of the idiot public (and government officials), you can be sure that the government had plenty of idiots then, just like now, and that all the talk of alchemy terrified them, even if it was just a 3% chance of being true (in their minds - but higher chance in the minds of idiots, including those within government and or royalty)
THat link doesn't work. Try this.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=isaac+newton,+occult&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Optimal Altitude for Throwing Banksters and Realtors Out of Helicopters
Forget about the helicopters. Use high altitude balloons. Just don't go above 65 miles or the banksters will exceed terminal velocity and burn up on reentry denying us a nice splatter at the end.
Banksters can't exceed terminal velocity by definition.
« First « Previous Comments 46,900 - 46,939 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,237,969 comments by 14,798 users - Ceffer, Misc online now