patrick.net

Dan8267 says

If conservatives had even a tiny bit of intelligence, they would realize that you cannot protect your own rights without protecting everyone else's.

If they had even a tiny bit of intelligence then they wouldn't be conservatives.

touché

Some of these 95 itms are totally legit. Some are exaggerated.

Some though, imply a total lack of intellectual honesty. Such as this:

12) Increased the national debt more in one term than Bush did in two

The national debt increased more during Obama’s first three years and two months than it did during all eight years of George W. Bush’s presidency.

There are only two possibilities, that is if you think this is a serious indictment of Obama's presidency.

Either you don't understand, after having ample opportunity to comprehend the very simple truth. Or you are a low integrity lying DB, who enjoys using lies to support their opinion. I have the lowest respect you can imagine for this type of person.

Again, there are some very legit criticisms on the list.

Dan8267 says

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

- Torturing terror suspects

Awesome. Terrorists don't deserve rights.

1. All humans have human rights. A right, by definition, cannot be taken away. A liberty that can be taken away is, by definition, a privilege.

2. Terror suspects are not necessary terrorists.

You are absolutely right. I still don't care. I am not gonna stand up for them, worrying about the rights of terrorists who openly call on Muslims to kill us. If our military has determined they are terrorists, then it's good enough for me. As you have shown in your above posts, going through our pathetically slow and expensive court system does not guarantee justice. Are you saying if an imminent terrorist attack is at hand, we should go through the fucking courts first. Bullshit, we could be dead by then.

Dan8267 says

ust remember, eventually some corrupt asshole will accuse you or one of your family members of being a terrorist or criminal because of

- a grudge

- a bounty

- a clerical error

- pseudo-science

Relax, the CIA is not that stupid.

Dan8267 says

Strategist says

It was not possible to bring him to trial.

It is always possible for the law to bring a person to trial that the state wants to bring to trial. Only pussies say otherwise.

No it isn't.

Dan8267 says

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

- Corrupt ties to big business

Don't forget the Unions.

Even the most corrupt union cannot do as much damage as too-big-too-fail corporations. You are trying to distract from a major problem by siting a minor one.

Unions don't have to be corrupt to do damage. Just being unions is bad enough. The Twinkies Unions (God knows how many) may not have been corrupt, but the damage they did was disgraceful.

Dan8267 says

I love the Nazi Patriot Act. Lets expand it.

You'll love it until its used against your family. Then you'll do a 180.

If you became a victim of terrorists you would be doing a 180 and agreeing with me.

Dan8267 says

This selfish, self-centered characteristic is intrinsic to conservatives. They never give a damn about injustices until it personally affects them.

If conservatives had even a tiny bit of intelligence, they would realize that you cannot protect your own rights without protecting everyone else's.

I'm not conservative. I am an Independent who happens to agree on this with them. But you can still call me stupid. :):)

bob2356 says

Dan8267 says

If conservatives had even a tiny bit of intelligence, they would realize that you cannot protect your own rights without protecting everyone else's.

If they had even a tiny bit of intelligence then they wouldn't be conservatives.

Dan8267 says

touché

The Conservatives can say the same thing against the libruls. As an independent I get to laugh at both. :) :) :)

Strategist says

We are in a war

You can't fight a war against a tactic. "The War against Flank Attacks" "The War against Fortifications" "The War against Aerial Interdiction".

How's the War on Drugs going?

thunderlips11 says

How's the War on Drugs going?

Not very well I'm afraid. The war against terrorism is doing better.

Strategist says

If you are a member of a terrorist organization, you are a terrorist even if you never held a gun.

So the President unilaterally determines that? Sounds safe and not open to abuse. Oh, they have a process. All the President's appointees, employees, and cronies help him review who is a terrorist. That'll stop abuse, everybody stands up to their boss and patron.

Dan8267 says

If conservatives had even a tiny bit of intelligence, they would realize that you cannot protect your own rights without protecting everyone else's.

See also:
http://patrick.net/?p=1249847

thunderlips11 says

Strategist says

If you are a member of a terrorist organization, you are a terrorist even if you never held a gun.

So the President unilaterally determines that?

Actually I came up with that. I hope the President takes my advise. God only knows, but Obama needs a lot of help.

America hasn't won a war in 70 years. Save for Christmas.

Oh yes, unions are true terrorists. They encourage employees to fight for a living wage for God's sake! Real Americans would accept the pittance offered by the holy employer and file for section 8 housing, food stamps and free gub'mint healthcare! That's how true patriots do it!

bob2356 says

If they had even a tiny bit of intelligence then they wouldn't be conservatives.

Exactly, being liberal requires less than a tiny bit of intelligence, anything more and you are at least a conservative.

Quigley says

Oh yes, unions are true terrorists. They encourage employees to fight for a living wage for God's sake! Real Americans would accept the pittance offered by the holy employer and file for section 8 housing, food stamps and free gub'mint healthcare! That's how true patriots do it!

Sorry Quigley, there is a reason why union membership has been on the decline. Wealth has to be produced before it can be claimed in the form of higher wages. Real wages are determined by your productivity regardless of what you may think living wages should be.

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

The war against terrorism is doing better.

Where??

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/24/world/meast/us-airstrikes/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Washington (CNN) -- U.S. and coalition warplanes pounded ISIS positions in eastern Syria on Wednesday, targeting what a Pentagon official described as mobile oil refineries being used by the so-called Islamic State terror group to help finance its operations.
The latest round of airstrikes were aimed at cutting off money flowing to ISIS, which makes up to $2 million a day from oil produced by the mobile refineries, Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, told CNN.
Fighter jets from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates flew alongside U.S. aircraft during the operation, hitting 12 locations, Kirby said.

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

The war against terrorism is doing better.

Where??

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/24/world/meast/us-airstrikes/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Washington (CNN) -- U.S. and coalition warplanes pounded ISIS positions in eastern

Oh, you mean TODAY!!! I thought you meant the last few years or so...

I'll tell you what the secret of winning the war against terrorism is....... It's NOT US going after the terrorists, it's MAKING the Islamic countries go after their own home grown terrorists. Our part should be no more than doing what we do best, providing technology and intelligence.

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

It's NOT US going after the terrorists, it's MAKING the Islamic countries go after their own home grown terrorists.

So, just how much wine have you drank so far tonight? :)

ONE! believe me.

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

Our part should be no more than doing what we do best,

Starting wars?

Oh God! You have a long way to go.

The secret on fighting terrorism is not to create it in the first place.

indigenous says

The secret on fighting terrorism is not to create it in the first place.

No one can disagree with that statement. The million dollar question is, who creates it in the first place....infidels or Islam?

Strategist says

No one can disagree with that statement. The million dollar question is, who creates it in the first place....infidels or Islam?

It is mutual, the defense contractors need the terrorists to justify mega bucks on war gadgets. The terrorists need the US forces to justify their actions.

Also think about how do terrorists gain knowledge on how to use these gadgets? I doubt the gadgets are all plug and play with a short cut sheet?

indigenous says

bob2356 says

If they had even a tiny bit of intelligence then they wouldn't be conservatives.

Exactly, being liberal requires less than a tiny bit of intelligence, anything more and you are at least a conservative.

Lame, lame, lame. My 5 year old can do better with a witty comeback. Would you like some help coming up with something more clever? ,She's always up for helping people out.

bob2356 says

She's always up for helping people out.

Good, get her to help you

Strategist says

Quigley says

Oh yes, unions are true terrorists. They encourage employees to fight for a living wage for God's sake! Real Americans would accept the pittance offered by the holy employer and file for section 8 housing, food stamps and free gub'mint healthcare! That's how true patriots do it!

Sorry Quigley, there is a reason why union membership has been on the decline. Wealth has to be produced before it can be claimed in the form of higher wages. Real wages are determined by your productivity regardless of what you may think living wages should be.

I think what you mean to say is that enough wealth must be earned to pay the CEO 100x a worker's salary with stock options and bonuses of course, and then lavishly reward a board and management. If there's any left over, the actual wealth producers (employees) get a spot at the end of the line.
Unions just provide some balance. Putting all the power with the company is like putting only two legs on a table. It's bound to topple over.

Quigley says

Unions just provide some balance.

They dont, i'll tell you why.

Quigley says

I think what you mean to say is that enough wealth must be earned to pay the CEO 100x a worker's salary with stock options and bonuses of course, and then lavishly reward a board and management. If there's any left over, the actual wealth producers (employees) get a spot at the end of the line.

What if there is a loss? Is the janitor willing to take a pay cut?

The reason union membership has been on the decline is:
1)outsourcing of labor to low wage countries
2)corporate greed
3)corporations account for more than 100 of the top political contributors to either party. They've bought and paid for our government and get the laws they want as a result.
4)constant media propaganda against organized labor

Even a poorly run union at least allows its members to contribute to the local economy, raising all boats and creating business opportunity. A few rich board members intent on rewarding themselves and stockholders is a tried and true recipe for creating American ghost towns. Killing towns is un-American. So, in conclusion, you have to ask yourself: Why do you hate America?

Call it Crazy says

Strategist says

indigenous says

The secret on fighting terrorism is not to create it in the first place.

No one can disagree with that statement. The million dollar question is, who creates it in the first place

The CIA...

Oh God...what are we gonna do with you.

Quigley says

The reason union membership has been on the decline is:

1)outsourcing of labor to low wage countries

That trend ain't gonna change.

Quigley says

2)corporate greed

That existed even during the rise of the unions.

Quigley says

3)corporations account for more than 100 of the top political contributors to either party.

That always existed too.

Quigley says

4)constant media propaganda against organized labor

If a liberal press is anti union, the unions must be really really bad.

You left out the real reason....Union greed. They sank company after company with their ridiculous demands. I wonder how the Twinkies union workers feel about their union. And to think they paid dues to a union boss who makes half a million or something. You don't get what you pay for.

Hey check this out:
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-29339845

Air France has offered to scrap plans to expand its Transavia low-cost airline in Europe, in return for pilots returning to work immediately.

In a statement, it said the proposal would help "find an immediate outcome to this destructive conflict".

The company also offered "a renewed guarantee that there will be no relocation" of jobs.

Pilots have been on strike for 10 days and have grounded about half of the airline's flights.

They are unhappy at the lower rates of pay offered by the expanding budget operation compared with core Air France services, threatening to strike indefinitely unless the European expansion is scrapped.

The strike has been costing the airline up to 15m euros (£11.8m) a day.

Air France said it would instead develop its Transavia France project.

"Our Transavia project is a 100% pro-France project. It is about developing Transavia to encourage growth in France and quickly create more than 1,000 jobs in France (including 250 pilot jobs)," said the chief executives of Air France-KLM, Alexandre de Juniac, and Air France, Frederic Gagey in a joint statement.

The greedy Air France union restricts the development of low cost airlines, forcing travelers to pay more. Over time, a new low cost startup will start taking market share from Air France, either driving it out of business or becoming dependent on government subsidies. But the unions don't give a crap because they will have milked the cow until their last miserable day.

Once again, you are proven wrong wrong wrong wrongwrongwrong....

Dan8267 says

1. All humans have human rights.

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

Just remember, eventually some corrupt asshole will accuse you or one of your family members of being a terrorist or criminal because of


- a grudge


- a bounty


- a clerical error


- pseudo-science

Relax, the CIA is not that stupid.

How can you be so ignorant of the history that occurred in your lifetime and only a few years ago?

CIA tortures wrong man

In 2003, Khaled el-Masri, a German citizen in Macedonia, was grabbed off a bus and taken to a secret prison in Afghanistan as part of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program. He was held there for five months. El-Masri was suspected of having ties to al-Qaeda, but he was the wrong guy. The mix-up was due to a misunderstanding concerning his name with the real suspected terrorist, as the names are spelled the same when using Arabic script.

A fucking clerical error and the CIA tortures an innocent man for five months.

Upon arrival, still handcuffed and blindfolded, he was initially placed in a chair, where he sat for one and a half hours….Then, two people violently pulled his arms back. On that occasion he was beaten severely from all sides. His clothes were sliced from his body with scissors or a knife. His underwear was forcibly removed. He was thrown to the floor, his hands were pulled back and a boot was placed on his back. He then felt a firm object being forced into his anus….He was then pulled from the floor and dragged to a corner of the room, where his feet were tied together. His blindfold was removed. A flash went off and temporarily blinded him. When he recovered his sight, he saw seven or eight men dressed in black and wearing black ski masks.

Four months, two hunger strikes, and a sojourn in more than one secret prison later, the man, Khaled El-Masri, who had been picked up in Macedonia in 2003, was simply dumped by the side of the road near an Albanian border crossing. Along the way, he’d had a gun held to his head as an interrogator berated him, demanding that he admit his connection to Al Qaeda. Why would someone with such dangerous connections be released? What about the casual information he might have that could unravel some devious plot?

The answer is simple: after a couple of months, the C.I.A. figured out that they had picked up not a shadowy terrorist but a car salesman from Bavaria who happened to have a similar name. Even then, they kept him prisoner for several weeks while trying to figure out their next move.

European court of human rights finds against CIA abuse of Khaled el-Masri

The CIA stripped, hooded, shackled, and sodomized el-Masri with a suppository – in CIA parlance, subjected him to "capture shock" – as Macedonian officials stood by. The CIA drugged him and flew him to Kabul to be locked up in a secret prison known as the "Salt Pit", where he was slammed into walls, kicked, beaten, and subjected to other forms of abuse. Held at the Salt Pit for four months, el-Masri was never charged, brought before a judge, or given access to his family or German government representatives.

The CIA ultimately realised that it had mistaken el-Masri for an al-Qaida suspect with a similar name. But it held on to him for weeks after that. It was not until 24 May 2004, that he was flown, blindfolded, earmuffed, and chained to his seat, to Albania, where he was dumped on the side of the road without explanation.

So Strategist, is your family immune to clerical errors? How would you like it if your son was sodomized by some sickos in the CIA?

Dan8267 says

How can you be so ignorant of the history that occurred in your lifetime and only a few years ago?

Strategist is ignorant of the history of what he did this morning, never mind a few years ago.

Dan8267 says

So Strategist, is your family immune to clerical errors? How would you like it if your son was sodomized by some sickos in the CIA?

When has anyone ever been immune to clerical errors errors?
The CIA makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
The FBI makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
The IRS makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
The Cops makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
The military makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
The government makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.
Now we have anarchy.
Mistakes are guaranteed. Get used to it.

Call it Crazy says

Haven't you figured it out yet?

Dan NEVER makes mistakes.... That's why he's superior not only to everyone here at Patnet, but also the whole country!

Do you think Mother Nature made a mistake with Dan?

Strategist says

When has anyone ever been immune to clerical errors errors?

The CIA makes mistakes, so let's shut them down.

You made the erroneous statement that the CIA isn't stupid enough to torture a person because of a clerical error. This statement is empirically false.

Rather than admitting that you were wrong and that we can't trust the CIA to not torture the wrong person, you are now making the Straw Man argument and false dichotomy that we either let the CIA commit crimes against humanity and torture innocent people, or we entirely shut down the CIA and give up any form of government to roam the land naked and lawless.

The use of Straw Men and false dichotomies indicate weakness and a fool's position. People who honestly believe they have a good case rely on neither.

Furthermore, you have failed to learn the most important lesson presented to you, that you are also at risk of being harmed by lawless and unaccountable government agencies. That clerical error could have damn well been you or your son.

Not only did the CIA illegally torture an innocent person, but when the mistake was found out, instead of releasing that person, the CIA tried to torture him into false confessions to cover up their mistake and then left him for dead, hoping he wouldn't live to tell his story, in the middle of nowhere. These are not people with good intentions.

As for the alternative to lawlessness? Well, we can start by prosecuting to the fullest extent of the law, any person involved in the kidnapping, false imprisonment, and torture of this innocent person. The long arm of the law should be able to reach other parts of the government's body.

Call it Crazy says

Haven't you figured it out yet?

Dan NEVER makes mistakes.... That's why he's superior not only to everyone here at Patnet, but also the whole country!

1. I have admitted to mistakes on this site.
2. I have never claimed to never make mistakes. In fact I've claimed the opposite.
3. Whenever I do make a mistake, I correct it.
4. Yes, I do make far fewer mistakes than you, but that's mainly because you deliberately make mistakes to support your evil agenda.
5. I have never claimed to be "superior to everyone".
6. Yes, I am morally, intellectually, and ethically superior to you, personally. But it's not that I have a high opinion of myself. It's that I have a very low opinion of you.
7. You're attempt to Poisoning the Well is transparent. The only people who poison the well are those with no case who are trying to fool an audience they believe is stupid. By making this attempt, you are telling all Patrick.net readers that you think they are stupid enough to fall for your puerile tricks.
8. The mature thing to do when presented with a compelling counter-argument to something you believe is to either find a rational flaw in the counter-argument or, if you can't do that, change your belief to accommodate your now greater understanding of the subject matter. I do this all the time, which is why I make far fewer mistakes than you do.

CaptainShuddup says

I wrote in Ron Paul for President.

Yeah Ron Paul never lies. Riiiight!

Vicente says

CaptainShuddup says

I wrote in Ron Paul for President.

Yeah Ron Paul never lies. Riiiight!

Everyone lies. It's impossible to get through life without encountering a situation where the only non-foolish course of action is to lie. To always speak the truth would make someone effectively mentally handicap and incapable of participating in society. This is sad, but true, and ignoring this reality won't change it.

However, not all lies are equal. Lies to protect one from evil attacks, e.g. telling the Nazis that you aren't hiding Ann Frank, are entirely different than lies used as weapons, e.g. falsely accusing someone of a crime.

The real question is not whether or not Captain Shuddup really did write in Ron Paul for president, but rather why he might do so. Does the Captain support Ron Paul's stance on
- stopping torture
- ending undeclared wars
- dismantling the military industrial complex
- ending America's empire
- supporting civil rights

This is hardly likely. Far more likely, the Captain likes Ron Paul's economic policies, which are essentially the same as all other Republicans, to let corporations do whatever the hell they want to.

Reasons are far more important than conclusions.

Vicente says

CaptainShuddup says

I wrote in Ron Paul for President.

Where did I say that?

Call it Crazy says

But you have to come back and write a short novel to tells us how WONDERFUL you are... See a trend yet?

Honey, that response wasn't about me, it was about you and how much of a despicable liar you are.