patrick.net

A thin-skinned, two-faced, easily offended, treading-lightly, politically correct politician is the last thing this or any other first world nation needs right now.

Whether they are only using it as an excuse or not, radical Islamic (not Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, or Zoroastrian) terrorists are at the center of this runaway, cowardly barbarism.

They have sexism, child abuse, scripture and most importantly oil money and rapid worldwide publicity already working in their favor. We do not need an enabler as commander in chief.

Waving the constitution at Trump is not where this man or this media should be focusing their anger.

Hypocritically, you would clearly disregard the gold star Bengazi mother in the same way. There is no point in denying that double standard. Unlike Hillary Clinton, Trump had no direct or indirect part in the death of the soldier. You are foolish if you think she has more respect for their religion. She simply lies and hides her true feelings.

Personally, I don't like Donald Trump. I think he games the system and has taken far too much advantage of the Federal Reserve system for his own engradizement, but he is thick-skinned and politically incorrect on an issue that is spreading like last stage cancer through the entire first world.

Today we need George Patton at the helm more than we need the quintessential double-speaking, above the law, elitist politician.

Radical Islam mixed with oil money and worldwide publicity IS the problem. They wear no uniform, have no honor, and chant in the name of a false god as they murder innocent civilians. The gold star father's anger would be better targeted at those radicals.

Why do I know the Arabic word for "infidel" and not an Arabic word for slime-ball, evil, murderous, backward, sexist, abusers of the Koran?

It is the first and greatest responsibility of decent Muslims everywhere to come up with that new insulting and derogatory term for these cowardly jerks. They need to stand-up and call it out to these radicals with the same fervor as he waved the constitution at Mr. Trump - even if it means taking up arms against their fellow Muslims in defense of righteousness - because the division reveals true evil. Let an internal Muslim revolution settle this in the name of Allah. It is impossible that a true God would sanction this behavior, let alone reward it.

mell says

But calling somebody misogynist who had many successful relationships and happy spouses

"Many successful relationships?"

That's one way to spin "twice-divorced serial adulterer who'd like to bang his daughter."

I also enjoyed "Fox viewers give low marks to bimbo @MegynKelly will consider other programs!" and "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes. Blood coming out of her wherever."

The list of nasty remarks Trump has made about women is a target-rich environment.

What is Trump's angle here? He was still tweeting about it this morning. Is he trying to win this debate, distract from the Crimea debacle, or distract from Hillary's four Pinocchio gaffe yesterday?

YesYNot says

What is Trump's angle here?

None.

He has spent his adult life surrounded by yes-men who say "Yeah, Boss!", "Great idea, Boss!" and "Whatever you say, Boss!"

He sees every personal interaction as a contest, in which one party wins and the other loses. He has no idea how to back down, or how to handle being despised without hitting back. As Willie Brown said, if you're going to be in politics, you have to handle having millions of people openly despise you.

This is not a calculated strategy. Trump can't control himself, because he's a malignant narcissist who's spent his life among lickspittles. Look how he treats Christie, Pence, Rubio: destroy, humiliate, enslave, fuck, kill. To remain silent in the face of the Khan's criticism is to become their bitch, in his mind. He's somewhere in 2nd grade.

It's why Trump shouldn't be given the nuclear codes.

Hillary's voting record in the Senate got his son Killed.
This guy is spitting on his own son's grave.

Tenpoundbass says

Hillary's voting record in the Senate got his son Killed.

Yes, Hillary supported that war.

Trump openly supported that war. You supported that war. It's probably that everyone you have ever voted for supported that war.

You put that boy in his grave.

Tenpoundbass says

Hillary's voting record in the Senate got his son Killed.

Yup. And 400,000 Syrians. Destabilizing a regime where ISIS has a presence will do that. And many tens of thousands if not more, Libyans.

tRUMP triples down. Smears parents as Sharia Jihadists. Are we supposed to believe that these Jihadists raised a son that would fight in the US military? How dumb do the smearists think we are?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/khizr-khan-smeared_us_579f5c3ae4b0e2e15eb65db1

HEY YOU says

Fuck anyone that says Trump hasn't read The U.S. Constitution,

although it was 140 characters at a time.

Obama read the constitution, so what? Didn't stop him from bastardizing it.

Fuck anyone who says that Nancy Pelosi didn't read the affordable care act...we have to forgive them, they needed "pass it to see what was in it"...I guess that's constitutional as well.

Hillary Clinton voted for patriot act, I guess that's constitutional as well.

YesYNot says

Smears parents as Sharia Jihadists.

That's the conundrum with moderate Muslims, they may/may not openly angle for sharia but most will happily acquiesce if someone else fights for it on their behalf and succeeds in gaining the opportunity to practice sharia law

MMR says

Obama read the constitution, so what? Didn't stop him from bastardizing it.

I think that you are admitting that Trump hasn't read the constitution, but that is OK. Your reasoning is that Obama has read it, but you think he bastardized it in some way. Good stuff.

YesYNot says

Smears parents as Sharia Jihadists.

Well, he certainly faced down that baby at his rally.

If he wins a dissing battle with the family of a heroic dead US soldier, hell, that would be impressive. I hope he keeps this up, and spares nothing in this fight. We need to put the families of dead soldiers in their place, so America can be great again!

HydroCabron says

We need to put the families of dead soldiers in their place, so America can be great again!

Funny enough, Colbert did a skit last night asking "Is there anyone Trump won't attack?" The next morning, he goes after a baby.

www.youtube.com/embed/Oh4BUE0c6FQ

https://mobile.twitter.com/Dakota_Meyer/status/760592745178083328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Palin son in law rebukes trump. Who will the Palin side with?

YesYNot says

Funny enough, Colbert did a skit last night asking "Is there anyone Trump won't attack?" The next morning, he goes after a baby.

Think about this.

One candidate has a proven voting record of supporting every war, Patriot Act passage and renewal, and as Sec of State presided over two horrible Civil Wars resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands. While ISIS was expanding in Syria, she was working with Google to track and encourage Assad Defectors to destabilize and weaken his regime's capacity to fight ISIS.

But Trump says mean things sometimes.

That video doesn't play. When you post a youtube video, if you do an edit after that, you have to repost the youtube url because its broken in the process.

Here, found it:www.youtube.com/embed/UcSV2MkFENk

marcus says

That video doesn't play.

Thanks. Fixed. The video is mediocre, but timing is funny.

thunderlips11 says

But Trump says mean things sometimes.

He also says inconsistent things. Literally i don't know if there is a position he hadn't been on both sides of, including Iraq and Syria conflicts. He lies constantly, and is totally unprepared and doesn't seem to care. Being mean doesn't cover it. Having no decency is more apt.

Oh, I see I found a different one. Good though.

YesYNot says

thunderlips11 says

But Trump says mean things sometimes.

He also says inconsistent things. Literally i don't know if there is a position he hadn't been on both sides of, including Iraq and Syria conflicts. He lies constantly, and is totally unprepared and doesn't seem to care. Being mean doesn't cover it. Having no decency is more apt.

Trump's odds of winning just declined. I believe it was due to Khan.
I think the Dems intentionally had Khan speak at the convention, knowing Trump would foolishly attack him back. Brilliant strategy.

It doesn't take strategy to get Trump to screw himself over.

Does anyone think that when he originally decided to run, that even he thought he could make it this far ? Arguably he doesn't want to President.

Strategist says

Trump's odds of winning just declined. I believe it was due to Khan

It's fitting that a Muslim war hero provided the sword for him to fall on. Perhaps he was baited. Perhaps Kahn was one of many people trotted out to present an image of America that reflects Hillary's vision and rebukes Donald's. Trump did the same thing in his convention, trotting out two mother's of diplomats who blamed Hillary. It was probably just to make her look bad. Fortunately, she stayed on message, and let the grieving parents tell their story without picking a fight with them.

YesYNot says

Trump did the same thing in his convention, trotting out two mother's of diplomats who blamed Hillary. It was probably just to make her look bad. Fortunately, she stayed on message, and let the grieving parents tell their story without picking a fight with them.

No, the media coverage was skewed. CNN and others didn't even cover the State Workers' parents or only played a soundbite in passing. Moar of them covered Khan in his entirety.

Trump needs to take a step back to avoid being baited. However, Khan is not the squeaky clean, faultless, uncontroversial Good Muslim (tm) the Hillary Campaign and Media Allies have made him out to be, which is a mitigating factor. The last time Trump made this kind of mistake was Curiel. It was okay to have surrogates point out Curiel's La Raza connections and relationships with the opposing attorneys; ditto for Khan the Immigration Lawyer for wealthy Arabs and Pakistanis who worked at a Saudi Lobbyist Law Firm.

In the final analysis, it will be the economy and desire for changing course that will decide the election. Only if Trump makes several mistakes like this will it really translate.

What we do need is a proper three debates, with at least two of them featuring all the candidates. After all, the MSM is bragging about Johnson (while all but ignoring Stein); their numbers are good enough to include them.

Hillary wants to make it "Crazy Guy, or Boring Me". The people need to see the spectrum of viable alternatives.

BTW, McCain is not an asset.

"Even McCain said..." actually makes most independents and republican voters more committed, and turns off a few lefties too. McCain lost his "Independent Maverick" credentials before the 2008 campaign got underway. He's a toxic brand like the Bushes right now.

thunderlips11 says

No, the media coverage was skewed. CNN and others didn't even cover the State Workers' parents or only played a soundbite in passing. Moar of them covered Khan in his entirety.

No doubt the media is anti Trump.

Hillary can be blamed for things, because she has been in the game. The only thing Trump has going for him, is that he doesn't have a record, so we don't have proof of how bad he will be. As for his lying, he's proven to lie far more than anyone else, unless you buy the conspiracy story that the press is out to get him.
Strategist says

No doubt the media is anti Trump.

Trump has been crying about the media from day one. He cries about everyone not treating him fairly. When one thinks that the whole world is out to get him, he ought to take a step back, and reevaluate the situation. The press loves his candidacy. He's made all sorts of money for them, and they've given him millions in free air time. If the press are coming out against him now more than not, it's because he keeps fucking up. That is the best way for them to make money - by selling a ticket to the circus. To a degree, he's still probably grabbing negative attention on purpose. There's no way he's so stupid that he's making mistake after mistake.

thunderlips11 says

Moar of them covered Khan in his entirety.

Maybe Kahn's speech was better. It was a killer speech, possibly upstaging Clinton. They got most of their press after Trump went 'oh no you ditent' on them.

She was menstruating onstage. So what? That's what fertile women do.
It would be PC to say she had a 'zita' bite.
Trump however just calls it as it is.
The left has a voracious appetite for political correctness, but a bulimic twitch for the truth...

HydroCabron says

I also enjoyed "Fox viewers give low marks to bimbo @MegynKelly will consider other programs!" and "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes. Blood coming out of her wherever."

thunderlips11 says

Let's go back to 9/11. If we had a stricter Visa policy, and vetting actually meant something, 9/11 wouldn't have happened, then the kid wouldn't have had to die and would have been alive.

Don't freak out... I've not gone to the dark side... HOWEVER.... Seems like we wanted to assert ourselves over there in order to protect US oil interests... If it hadn't been 9/11, might it have been something else? Was the war really avoidable?

Those people are out there murdering our soldiers, and if they could they would be murdering us all here. Yet, Trump is somehow a bad guy (according to liberals) because he says we shouldn't invite those assholes from middle east into our country? DNC and Hillary need their head examined!

'Dishonest demagogue' loses another prominent republican:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/meg-whitman-hillary-clinton.html

FortWayne says

DNC and Hillary need their head examined!

They sure do. To be honest, so does the Pope.

Strategist says

DNC and Hillary need their head examined!

They sure do. To be honest, so does the Pope.

Just out of curriosity...and this may have already been brought up but I don't tend to read 100+ post threads where I am just starting so *grunch*

Why is the dad so pissed of at Trump, yet not pissed off at Hillary who voted to send his kid to fight the other muslims?

YesYNot says

'Dishonest demagogue' loses another prominent republican:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/politics/meg-whitman-hillary-clinton.html

Yay another elite supports Hildebeast. Does anyone really need any other reason to vote against her?

The wrath of Khan is totally bogus. Khan is upset that Trump's proposed extra verification of Muslim immigrants will interfere with his business model. His firm specializes in getting special H3B visas for Saudis with money.
So he has an obvious lucre-based reason for attacking Trump. The DNC and the oligarch-owned media are giving him the platform, and hiding his blatant bias. Serves us all right for believing ANYTHING the media says! Especially about this election! Media bias is so blatant this election that it's completely unbelievable. News is no longer even fact-based, just opinion masquerading as reporting.
Fuck a bunch of that!

dodgerfanjohn says

Why is the dad so pissed of at Trump, yet not pissed off at Hillary who voted to send his kid to fight the other muslims?

Skip to 3:20 or so to skip the notorious HRC. Skip to 6:30 if you want to see the Trump takedown.
www.youtube.com/embed/7z7lN7nQjG0

In a nutshell, he thinks Trump is a racist anti-american demagogue, who doesn't understand the constitution and hasn't sacrificed anything himself (skipped draft) and criticizes Muslim war heros. He said as much.

YesYNot says

In a nutshell, he thinks Trump is a racist anti-american demagogue

A fair reading of Trumps statement in context makes it clear that Trump was speaking about people illegally entering the US or illegally overstaying their visa's.

But instead of that context, you got articles with headlines like this from CNN, the Democrats idea of fair and balanced:

Trump's outrageous Mexico remarks
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/17/opinions/kohn-donald-trump-announcement/

Liar Kohn says: In Trump's formulation, it's not just Mexicans who are evil -- they're all rapists and drug lords, Trump asserts without any facts to base this upon -- but Mexico the country is also evil, deliberately sending "those people" with "those problems."

Of course the actual statement below does not at all support Liar Kohn's out of context assessment. So Khizr Khan is lying, probably in efforts to support his financial well being, and he is wrong about Trump being a racist. Liar Kohn willfully takes comments out of context in an effort to promote a political agenda and is well deserving of a punch to her putrid baby maker.

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trumps-epic-statement-on-mexico-2015-7

Statement from Donald J. Trump:

I don’t see how there is any room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the statement I made on June 16th during my Presidential announcement speech. Here is what I said, and yet this statement is deliberately distorted by the media:

“When Mexico (meaning the Mexican Government) sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you (pointing to the audience). They’re not sending you (pointing again). They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing drugs.They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people! But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we’re getting. And it only makes common sense. They’re sending us not the right people. It’s coming from more than Mexico. It’s coming from all over South and Latin America, and it’s coming probably from the Middle East. But we don’t know. Because we have no protection and we have no competence, we don’t know what’s happening. And it’s got to stop and it’s got to stop fast.”

What can be simpler or more accurately stated? The Mexican Government is forcing their most unwanted people into the United States. They are, in many cases, criminals, drug dealers, rapists, etc. This was evident just this week when, as an example, a young woman in San Francisco was viciously killed by a 5 time deported Mexican with a long criminal record, who was forced back into the United States because they didn’t want him in Mexico. This is merely one of thousands of similar incidents throughout the United States. In other words, the worst elements in Mexico are being pushed into the United States by the Mexican
government. The largest suppliers of heroin, cocaine and other illicit drugs are Mexican cartels that arrange to have Mexican immigrants trying to cross the borders and smuggle in the drugs. The Border Patrol knows this. Likewise, tremendous infectious disease is pouring across the border. The United States has become a dumping ground for Mexico and, in fact, for many other parts of the world. On the other hand, many fabulous people come in from Mexico and our country is better for it. But these people are here legally, and are severely hurt by those coming in illegally. I am proud to say that I know many hard working Mexicans—many of them are working for and with me…and, just like our country, my organization is better for it.

The Mexican Government wants an open border as long as it’s a ONE WAY open border into the United States. Not only are they killing us at the border, but they are killing us on trade … and the country of Mexico is making billions of dollars in doing so.

I have great respect for Mexico and love their people and their peoples’ great spirit. The problem is, however, that their leaders are far smarter, more cunning, and better negotiators than ours. To the citizens of the United States, who I will represent far better than anyone else as President, the Mexican government is not our friend…and why should they be when the relationship is totally one sided in their favor on both illegal immigration and trade. I have pointed this out during my speeches and it is something Mexico doesn’t want me to say. In actuality, it was only after my significant rise in the polls that Univision, previously my friend, went ballistic. I believe that my examples of bad trade deals for the United States was of even more concern to the Mexican government than my talk of border security.

I have lost a lot during this Presidential run defending the people of the United States. I have always heard that it is very hard for a successful person to run for President. Macy’s, NBC, Serta and NASCAR have all taken the weak and very sad position of being politically correct even though they are wrong in terms of what is good for our country. Univision, because 70% of their business comes from Mexico, in my opinion, is being dictated to by the Mexican Government. The last thing Mexico wants is Donald Trump as President in that I will make great trade deals for the United States and will have an impenetrable border--only legally approved people will come through easily.

Interestingly, Univision has just announced they are attempting to go public despite very poor and even negative earnings, which is not a good situation for a successful IPO or high stock price—not to mention that I am currently suing them for breach of contract. Remember, Univision is the one who began this charade in the first place, and they are owned by one of Hillary Clinton’s biggest backers. After the speech was made, there were numerous compliments and indeed, many rave “reviews”—there was very little criticism. It wasn’t until a week after my announcement that people started to totally distort these very easy to understand words. If there was something stated incorrectly, it would have been brought up immediately and with great enthusiasm.

The issues I have addressed, and continue to address, are vital steps to Make America Great Again! Additionally, I would be the best jobs President that God ever created. Let’s get to work!

Now Meg Whitman is for Hillary? She was the only Republican out here in CA who even other Republicans did not want to vote for because she was just such a total bitch. Hell, even I voted for Jerry Brown over her. She and Hillary sure go well together.

dodgerfanjohn says

Strategist says

DNC and Hillary need their head examined!

They sure do. To be honest, so does the Pope.

Just out of curriosity...and this may have already been brought up but I don't tend to read 100+ post threads where I am just starting so *grunch*

Why is the dad so pissed of at Trump, yet not pissed off at Hillary who voted to send his kid to fight the other muslims?

The Captain posted an article about the dad being a sharia lover. No sharia lover can ever like Trump.

Strategist says

The Captain posted an article about the dad being a sharia lover.

Still illiterate I see. IT was only Breitbart's and TPB's retarded headlines that made that inference. Khan went to Harvard Law school and enjoys being a U.S. Citizen. There isn't the slightest evidence he "loves" sharia law.