by AD ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2,989 - 3,028 of 5,636 Next » Last » Search these comments
All loans go through the bank directly, the bank assumes 100% of the risk, and has no one to back them if you fail to pay. Imagine what that does to lending standards and allowable length of repayment.
Reminds me of someone watching the shore break, not seeing the set that just came in and is about to put them on their ass. One of the best tricks of central government economy is keeping people lost in the weeds, never understanding primary trends or big pictures. Fitch gets it, why don't you?
Fitch, Moody’s, etc… the companies that gave the garbage CDO’s AAA ratings during the last housing bubble. They get it. Got it. 👍
You live in an ideal world while I live in reality. We don’t share the same view. We just have to disagree.
I must laugh when people bitch and moan about how unfair the housing market in the US is and how we need to change everything. It’s just pathetic. It’s like talking to a spoiled kid.
I gave you a pass on the rent chart that you shared. You didn’t interpret the chart correctly so your 24% drop projection/prediction is simply wrong. Go take a look at the chart again and know where you went wrong.
No bias for me. I’m a data/numbers guy. If it weren’t for this, I would still be slaving away at a W2 instead of quitting my job during the last housing bust and went all-in.
This is my stock account as we speak. I have money elsewhere and my wife has a sizable retirement plan. We’ll be alright if the housing market blows up.
Real diversification happens outside of paper.
The phenomenon I "think" we're seeing is that only the top % of income earners are buying homes now while the rest just rent. I don't see this trend changing because there are enough rich people to keep buying homes.
And btw a 2x4 is a 2x4.
This is my stock account as we speak. I have money elsewhere and my wife has a sizable retirement plan. We’ll be alright if the housing market blows up.
And btw a 2x4 is a 2x4.
Eman says
You live in an ideal world while I live in reality. We don’t share the same view. We just have to disagree.
That's about what my sister said about the jab. I hope it doesn't bite her.
Eman says
This is my stock account as we speak. I have money elsewhere and my wife has a sizable retirement plan. We’ll be alright if the housing market blows up.
Stocks will likely blow up first, but housing may not be far behind. Again, if you look at the big picture, everything crashed in '08, not just housing. Real diversification happens outside of paper.
I had a older house that I did a ton of work to new lumber never matches up exactly anymore. 2x4 is really 3 1/2x1 1 1/2
I have bought several new builds
If you look at the chart you shared, rent growth happened between 2005 to mid 2008. Mid 2008 was when rent growth went to zero and started to decline 2-3% to end 2008 to early 2009. Early 2009 to mid 2009 experienced another 3-5% rent drop before stabilizing and going back to 0% in early 2010. Then rents started to go up again. Total rent drop between 2008 to 2009 is not more than 10% compounded, which is what the data show.
The news comes shortly after insurance heavyweights State Farm and Allstate halted new business in California and Farmers Insurance placed a limit on the number of new customers it is willing to pick up. Last week, Liberty Mutual—Safeco’s parent company—also announced it would stop providing business owner coverage in California starting later this year.
All of these decisions have made it more difficult for Californians to insure their homes. But the latest policy by Safeco is slightly different: It will specifically impact the Bay Area.
Due to the Bay Area’s “significant earthquake risk and the resulting home fires they cause, and our high concentration of insurance exposure, we have taken the difficult but necessary step to further reduce our overall book of business through underwriting decisions on new and renewal homeowners policies,” a Liberty Mutual spokesperson said in an email to The Standard. “This decision impacts approximately 1 percent of our California homeowners business.”
We didn’t do anything for the rents to go up.
Oh boy.
First off, there is no loss. You don’t lose a penny until you sell.
There’s a big difference between a 2.75% and a 7% rate.
Question: is it better to buy when rates are high or when they're low?
Rubicon says
There’s a big difference between a 2.75% and a 7% rate.
Who has the bigger write off AND the most upside?
Eman says
We didn’t do anything for the rents to go up.
That was my point that you still missed. You don't have to anything, the government does it for you. If you understood what happens when free market principles are manipulated, you'd know why this is dangerous. The market will always return to a state of equilibrium, it is a law as much as gravity. The more manipulated it is, the harder the crash will be.
“Q4 2022 - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold in the US: $479,500.
Q2 2023 - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold in the US: $416,100.
Loss of 13.2% or $63,400.”
Oh boy.
First off, there is no loss. You don’t lose a penny until you sell. people don’t buy and sell shortly after. They stay put for 20years and sell for 2-3times more than what they paid for. Or never sell and rent out the property.
The first guy who paid a higher house price than the next guy in your example has a lower PITI per month.
There’s a big difference between a 2.75% and a 7% rate.
That first guy who bought the peak smiles everyday with his ~3% rate. We might not see such a low rate for a decade.
« First « Previous Comments 2,989 - 3,028 of 5,636 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pimco-kiesel-called-housing-top-160339396.html?source=patrick.net
Bond manager Mark Kiesel sold his California home in 2006, when he presciently predicted the housing bubble would pop. He bought again in 2012, after U.S. prices fell more than 30% and found a floor.
Now, after a record surge in prices, Kiesel says the time to sell is once again at hand.