patrick.net

marcus says

You mean like, for example, an announcement of an investigation by a foreign government in to the political rival Trump thought had the greatest chance to beat him in 2020 ?

So if I commit a potential crime, as long as I run for President I'm safe from Prosecution?

Maybe we need an investigation into Obama ordering audits into Trump's IRS records

Nothing in the Constitution about those running for, but not holding Federal Offices being immune from investigation and prosecution.

Left eating Britney Spears fan who is not even a Trump supporter.

Only proves left is autistic.

marcus says

There’s no one way to be a man.

Men who get their periods are men.

Men who get pregnant and give birth are men.

Trans and non-binary men belong.#InternationalMensDay— ACLU (@ACLU) November 19, 2019

The ACLU folks. Did you know that you can shed the lining of your uterus, even if you don't have one?

Is that the Charity that shut down right after Hillary lost her election?

jazz_music says

How much money did Hillary get from the Ukrainians? And what did the Ukrainians get for that large donation to the Clinton foundation? Do you think that war mongering bitch would have been a better president than Trump?

Not expecting answers.

Politicians are so corrupt. They claim to serve the people but in reality we serve them.

NoCoupForYou says

SunnyvaleCA says

That would be a "no," Marcus. Although Trump did temporarily hold up money, he never requested an announcement. And, in fact, he released the money before such announcement was made; and, in fact, there has never been an announcement.

The whole thing is silly.

The US always uses aid leverage and always has.

This is just a red herring.

One would have to prove that POTUS received "something of personal value" from the Ukraine in return for aid.

If Trump is guilty, then Jimmy Carter is guilty of bribery because he withheld cooperation and aid with Iran until they released the hostages, which would have given him an advantage over Ronald Reagan.

Yes, totally. Giving away free money as "aid" is always the beginning of a quid pro quo. Maybe it's for buying votes from that country at the UN, or maybe it's so they go along with our war-that-we-pretend-isn't-a-war "sanctions" against countries we want to overthrow, or maybe it's to produce a fraudulent Steele dossier to attack a political rival.

marcus says

Here's what's missing:

Everybody wanted a clean sweep of the FBI after decades of Hoover's corruption and extortion.
Deepthroat was passed over for Director of the FBI because of his long history of being a top Hoover crony.
He leaked everything about Watergate to the WaPo as an act of Revenge about not getting his bureaucrat due.

marcus says

Yeah those antifa punks are pussys!

marcus says

The TDS expressed on this thread is pathetic, but occasionally funny.

If your name is Donald Trump, you stomped the dog shit out of Hillary Clinton and wiped your ass on the first Negro President's Legucy. Then it's an impeachable offense.



Onvacation says

Seems consistent because Antifa is more numerous and more dangerous as they move into more violent phases.

marcus says

:
Don't you just hate those ivory tower wonks ? Give me a corrupt emotionally challenged narcissist con man any day of the week. It's so refreshing ™️

The first two made their money with fraud schemes and selling access to power which defrauded the public who elected them.

Trump made his money by starting hundreds of businesses which served the public.

And you wonder why people don’t trust Ivy League assholes!!

jazz_music says

Is there ANY factual basis for this cartoon?

Not expecting an answer.

There's a difference in cases in the real world with evidence that can convict. Vs the Liberal pure made up fantasies like this pisspoor meme.

marcus says

marcus says

He's the most calm eloquent guy in Congress. He chews people up with their own shit. He doesn't pull the race card like all of the Libcom Slicksters like to do.
how come there aint no Black Caucus members on this committee accusing the Ukraine ambassadors of being racists? Where in the Fuck is Ted Lieu?
There's a Cock Sucker for ya!

Booger says

Is this real? Went to UM, just curious.

marcus says

God Marcus. This meme is terrible. Please stop.

marcus says

:
Filed under "Facts"

How is this even humor? God you suck at memes. Go ahead and flag this as personal. I’ll probably do it myself. But you are truly dumb and not funny.

marcus says

:
Filed under "Facts"

Absolutely wrong. He never said he acted under Trumps orders. He repeated spoke how he "assumed" that is what Trump wanted. When asked point blank if anyone told him to withhold aid for a favor, he said no. He also said Trump specifically said "no quid pro quo." Of course the anti-Trumpers are saying the "no quid pro quo" statement came out because Trump was anticipating being investigated.

marcus says

Jezus... you are the worst

marcus says

What was the quid pro quo TODAY? Arms for Investigation? Announcement for meeting? Bribery? Extortion? OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

Nunes asked for the whistleblower AND Hunter Biden to testify in closed door hearings. The news reports it as "Nunes wants to expose the whistleblower to bodily harm or even murder".

It's all political theatre.

Meanwhile in Hong Kong...

marcus says

:


This guy was never an enemy of Trumps. He was Trumps guy.

Either he has the integrity and or he realizes it would catch up with him if he doesn't tell the truth, or perhaps some combination of both.

Why don’t you post the rest of it? You know, the part where he says it was his supposition?

CovfefeButDeadly says

Why don’t you post the rest of it? You know, the part where he says it was his supposition?

Because he's a pond scum sucking news feeder.

Alright listen up Pissheads!
There is no such thing as "Fake News" there is only "Reputable News".
Well how do I know if my news source is reputable or not?
Great question!
Ask yourself would your news source print a story you read somewhere else, that you know to be true, and actual news because the actual source Tweeted it, so there's no dispute on the accuracy. Now ask yourself. Would CNN, MSNBC, FOX, Huffington Post, WaPo, The New York Times, print, publish or broadcast that given story.
If you answered no, then you personally labeled your news source as "Fake News".

See! Trump nor his supporters had to do it for you. Is your news source reputable?
The answer is probably NO!

marcus says