« First « Previous Comments 256 - 295 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
The stormtroopers coming to forcibly inject me even if I already opted out of attending the school/workplace that set the vaccine-for-entry requirement. That would be the limit where I crack open my gun safe.
this is not tyranny.
That did not happen, and even though YOU said there was some rumor of that, It wasn't a rumor I ever heard, or a scenario I thought was remotely likely.
So, boosters every day of a new vaxx developed in the last month and tested on, say, 8 mice and no humans wouldn't bother you?
"Take ze experimental jab or you can't work!" If that's not tyranny, what is?
Still I wouldn't be advocating to shoot or hang anyone.
DeficitHawk says
Still I wouldn't be advocating to shoot or hang anyone.
Why not? They killed plenty of people, kids and adolescents with the mandated clot shots. Life long prison at least.
'take the jab or you cant work here'.
I have a friend that worked at a credit union for thirty years. She was fired for not wanting to take an experimental biologic agent. I guess she can learn to code at home.
These are elected officials acting within their authority
Actually the school district my kids attend has an opt out provision involving routine testing. So even schools have opt out.
You vote.
It is fact though the same guy that fucked up the AIDS response is/was lead on Covid response
I think the overall narrative of stormtroopers making everyone get vaccinated is frankly overdone. Its not really like that.
forced to endure some inconvenience
You will be impacted negatively by decisions people make that you dont agree with.
resort to pitchforks, rifles, and nooses every time that happens
why dont others participate?
people who have minority opinions and keep getting beat in elections
DeficitHawk says
'take the jab or you cant work here'.
I have a friend that worked at a credit union for thirty years. She was fired for not wanting to take an experimental biologic agent. I guess she can learn to code at home.
change through voting
mell says
change through voting
Can change through voting ever remove unelected "health" officials? How would that happen if they are immune from firing by the executive branch? I'm not saying it's completely impossible, but that there is no clear path on how to fire someone like Fauci quickly
Not every time, THIS one time. The vaxx mandates are the worst crime against the largest number of people ever committed. It is THE moral issue which divides the people who would collaborate with genocide from those who would resist genocide.
I think the subconscious realization that they have participated in true evil on a mind-boggling level make them uncomfortable, so they don't want to think about it.
The total popular House vote was majority Republican. That's not minority.
The election of Trump was not getting beat. Not that I'm much of a Trump fan, but his historic win in 2016 energized a lot of people who have been harmed for decades by, for example, the outsourcing of US manufacturing to China.
Patrick says
mell says
change through voting
Can change through voting ever remove unelected "health" officials? How would that happen if they are immune from firing by the executive branch? I'm not saying it's completely impossible, but that there is no clear path on how to fire someone like Fauci quickly
How is "Dr" Fuckyouchi immune from the firing by the President? I believe the fucker could be fired at any second.
I recall articles calling for the power of the president to fire anyone in the executive branch, implying that that power does not exist, especially with respect to Fauci.
I guess my take on this all is that if you have a minority view on things like this, you will sometimes be forced to endure some inconvenience by the majority. It is part of democracy.
I have a simple question. If everyone you know who got the vaxx died, but the government kept denying it, would you still stick to voting alone as a way to oppose the vaxx?
I want to know what it would take to turn you into me.
"Trump Won" (Most people dont believe this, maybe 30%)
"Covid was a hoax or conspiracy" (Most people do not believe this. maybe 25%)
What if, say, 0.1 percent of vaxx recipients died or were severely injured, yet the government kept denying it?
Will you acknowledge that 75% of Covid deaths were amongst those 65 or older?
But I think you are alleging that there is a high rate of side effects than studies show, people know about this, and a cover up going on.
Sure, this is a disease that disproportionately affects older people, diabetics, and a few other risk factors. I dont have the percentages broken down by risk factor handy, but sure that's the truth as I understand it.
And now it has reached the extreme of doctors in California being told by law that they may not report or repeat what they see with their own eyes or they will be punished for spreading "disinformation".
Onvacation says
Will you acknowledge that 75% of Covid deaths were amongst those 65 or older?
Sure, this is a disease that disproportionately affects older people, diabetics, and a few other risk factors. I dont have the percentages broken down by risk factor handy, but sure that's the truth as I understand it.
I've gotten lost in tin foil hat world of non credible information,
Sure, this is a disease that disproportionately affects older people, diabetics, and a few other risk factors. I dont have the percentages broken down by risk factor handy, but sure that's the truth as I understand it.
« First « Previous Comments 256 - 295 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
By polite, I mean refraining from attacking the person in either direction, but sticking to points of argument instead. So no "You are a (whatever)" will not be allowed. The only appropriate use of "you" will be "Here you said..."
I just ran into an old guy in a cafe who pointed in the newspaper to the governor results in California, which added up to 110%. I said, "well, that's California" and so he accused me of being an "election denier". I asked if he'd seen "2000 Mules" and he said he hadn't "because it's been debunked". Uh, it's the same people who committed the election fraud who are claiming that "2000 Mules" was debunked.
Nor had he heard what was on Hunter's laptop, since he watches only corporate news.
I think I might have made a dent in his wall of denial, and I'd like to try with others.