0
3

Housing prices will not go down...


               
2025 Jan 2, 7:23pm   21,604 views  599 comments

by anon5525   follow (0)  

... because immigration will not go down. Housing prices are controlled by supply and demand. There is no space in any urban area to build more housing. None. You can't insert land between two streets. The only way to increase supply is to steal people's homes through eminent domain and tear them down to build higher density apartments

So the only way to decrease real prices is to decrease demand, and the only way to do that is to kick out all illegal immigrants and anchor babies. Will Trump do this? Almost certainly not. Even with control over all three branches of the government, the Republicans are not going to get rid of all the illegals who are driving up housing prices and social welfare costs. I wish that I was wrong about this, but I'm not.

The United States population reached 200 million on November 20, 1967. If there was no net migration, then the U.S. population have stabilized to about 220 million. Instead, the population is 335 million. This is why housing is so expensive. This is why rent is so damn high. This is why the younger generations cannot afford to have children. This is why the only way to keep the population from falling is to import massive numbers of unskilled, uneducated, and often criminal immigrants. Both parties are responsible for this: democrats for importing voters and republicans for importing farm laborers. Both parties want cheap labor.

When you import massive numbers of low-iq, low-skill workers, your per capital GDP declines relative to where it would have been otherwise. Yes, technological advancements mask this because technology increases GDP faster than low-skill immigration decreases it, but most of those gains don't get seen by the middle class.

Since both parties, and their corporate overlords, are benefiting from the current system, immigration will continue and housing prices will also continue to rise. I suppose I shouldn't care since I own and have a 2.25% mortgage that is being eaten away by inflation, but anyone young enough that they having bought already is fucked.

« First        Comments 484 - 523 of 599       Last »     Search these comments

484   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 15, 9:06am  

HeadSet says

Fortwaye says


CA instant action to prop up landlords by paying rents.

How is that constitutional? It seems a court would strike that down fast. It also seems that locals who are noy illegals would object to rents being propped up.

Constitutional? Too funny. Endless unconstitutional shit has been going on. It’s a power struggle, the constitution be damned.
485   Ceffer   2025 Oct 17, 2:46pm  

Even infallible Santa Cruz is showing signs of softening. The schools around where we have our place are obviously showing many fewer babmbinos. The illegals would come over here and use false addresses to send to the schools, and, of course, the KommieKunt Teacher's Union gave their blessing.

486   AD   2025 Oct 17, 3:02pm  

MolotovCocktail says






or the heirs to these homes (young Generation X's, etc) sell at a much lower price ?

.
487   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 20, 10:45pm  

AD says

Generation X's, etc) sell at a much lower price ?


Yes. And that is why housing prices as we've known them our entire lives are fucked.
488   AD   2025 Oct 20, 11:30pm  

MolotovCocktail says

AD says


Generation X's, etc) sell at a much lower price ?


Yes. And that is why housing prices as we've known them our entire lives are fucked.


Yes, as a senior citizen born in 1930 has a home valued $1 million in 2023 (and valued for $300,000 in 2002), and then their Gen X heir inherits it in 2025 and would be happy to sell it for $700,000 (hence about 4% annual appreciation from 2002 to 2025).
489   WookieMan   2025 Oct 21, 9:35am  

AD says

MolotovCocktail says


AD says



Generation X's, etc) sell at a much lower price ?


Yes. And that is why housing prices as we've known them our entire lives are fucked.



Yes, as a senior citizen born in 1930 has a home valued $1 million in 2023 (and valued for $300,000 in 2002), and then their Gen X heir inherits it in 2025 and would be happy to sell it for $700,000 (hence about 4% annual appreciation from 2002 to 2025).

Yeah but how many inherit the home and just move in and that house never hit the market. Had a childhood friend that was a widow and got killed walking the dog by a car. Son moved into a paid off house.

My past house my mom bought. Never hit the market. Boomers are also a bit more financially savvy than their previous generations. My mom bought the house in a trust. I get the house back when she dies. So by default I still kind of own it unless I die first. I just can't borrow against it, but it will probably be a $400k asset in 20 years paid off.

Point being is there's a shadow inventory no one knows about. People are also smarter about realtors. I avoided $15k in commissions and another $1,500 in attorney fees overall selling to my mom. Most data is taken from MLS data. What you don't see, you don't know.

The kids that sell at a lower price are like your classic lottery winner. They're greedy and will blow all the money and just wanted it now. I think that's a tiny fraction of home sales. Most smart people want the most money or just move into the inherited property. Plus there's a good chance the house is in shitty shape if the parents were 70-90. So the house may be worth less money and not the kid willing to take less.
490   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 21, 9:59am  

You act like 4% price growth is written law.
491   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 21, 10:12am  

WookieMan says

Yeah but how many inherit the home and just move in and that house never hit the market.


Something 71% of homes inherited are sold nu the heirs. Currently.
492   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 21, 10:27am  

Glock-n-Load says

You act like 4% price growth is written law.


That is exactly how many Housing Experts on PatNet think.
493   GNL   2025 Oct 21, 10:49am  

1930 Gold = $20.67. Gold right now = $4125. So that means gold has a yearly growth rate of 5.73%/annum.
494   WookieMan   2025 Oct 21, 10:52am  

Glock-n-Load says

You act like 4% price growth is written law.

It's not, but it definitely trends around that amount. I wouldn't expect it every year. If you're planning for retirement when you're 35, 4% is probably a safe bet over 30 years to expect that appreciation. Hopefully paid off and tax free if you sell.

Renting could be cheaper, but if you don't invest the savings you'll be more broke than owning. And also have to deal with the risk of moving not at will and not customizing your space. And most repairs are trivial when owning or are 10-30 year events and insurance may cover it.
495   WookieMan   2025 Oct 21, 10:56am  

MolotovCocktail says

WookieMan says

Yeah but how many inherit the home and just move in and that house never hit the market.

Something 71% of homes inherited are sold nu the heirs. Currently.

Link?

WookieMan says

Point being is there's a shadow inventory no one knows about.

That 71% of inherited homes might be 1% of the overall housing market. Need to back that up with data if you state that. I gave two examples and I know of more personally and from my real estate years. No one wants to pay a realtor when selling. So the data on inherited homes cannot be tracked like other sales.
496   Blue   2025 Oct 21, 11:24am  

MolotovCocktail says

Glock-n-Load says


You act like 4% price growth is written law.


That is exactly how many Housing Experts on PatNet think.

I know someone at East Bay Area, CA experiencing 5%/year decline for the last 3 years. He is having hard time to sell. Cases like this are not uncommon. But slow and steady steamrolling inflation brings the RE market up in the long run. You can’t argue with criminal enterprise governments and their free printing press. Because they want to “help” people 😜
497   GNL   2025 Oct 21, 11:27am  

Blue says

MolotovCocktail says


Glock-n-Load says



You act like 4% price growth is written law.


That is exactly how many Housing Experts on PatNet think.


I know someone at East Bay Area, CA experiencing 5%/year decline for the last 3 years. He is having hard time to sell. Cases like this are not uncommon. But slow and steady steamrolling inflation brings the RE market up in the long run. You can’t argue with criminal enterprise governments and their free printing press. Because they want to “help” people 😜

Yes, I understand. What got my goat was thinking there's some kind of norm. It's all over the place and depends on which 20(?) or whatever consecutive years you use.
498   GNL   2025 Oct 21, 11:28am  

We could go back to the beginning of time and determine the average daily temperature also but, that won't tell us jack shit.
500   Blue   2025 Oct 21, 12:01pm  

Btw, the person I mentioned above bought during scamdamic peak prices. Seller put a home depot lipstick on $1.1m old shack sold for $1.5m. Poor guy bought out of social pressure.
501   AD   2025 Oct 21, 6:57pm  

Glock-n-Load says

You act like 4% price growth is written law.


Long-term, real appreciation
Negligible growth: Robert Shiller's data shows that between 1890 and 2019, national housing prices grew by less than 0.6% per year in real terms (after adjusting for inflation), which he calls "pitiful" compared to the ~7% real return of the S&P 500.
"Fad" of housing as an investment: The idea of housing as a great investment was a fad, especially after the early 2000s, and he does not expect it to return with the same force.
Other factors: The low long-term growth is partly because the stock market has delivered significantly higher real returns.
Factors that suppress home appreciation
Maintenance and depreciation: Homes require maintenance, depreciate, and can go out of style, which are problems that stocks do not face.
Technical progress: New homes are constantly being built to higher standards, which affects the value of older homes.
Supply: The constant construction of new homes has historically been a factor keeping prices from appreciating significantly in real terms.
502   Misc   2025 Oct 21, 10:51pm  

Shiller fails to take into account the transaction costs of the stock market. You see about 97% of listed stocks in 1890 have gone belly up to be replaced with others, that have been replaced etc After factoring in other market frictions (not buying exactly as the indexes, the bid/ask spread, having to sell in a downs year), the real rate of return for the stock market is about 1% per year.

And don't forget those pesky taxes that accrue along the way when having to sell to get the new stocks.
503   Misc   2025 Oct 22, 3:12am  

You can tell people that long term Government bonds are yielding 2.25% over the rate of inflation, and that's an excellent long-term proposition, but people are greedy. They forecast short term trends out into the far future and they think they are more clever than a paltry interest rate.
504   WookieMan   2025 Oct 22, 7:16am  

AD says

Technical progress: New homes are constantly being built to higher standards, which affects the value of older homes.

This part is not true at all. They're only being built faster and like shit. 3-4 houses built in the last 2 years in our subdivision have had all their windows replaced. The windows were fine, the house wasn't built square. Most mass produced home, condos or apartment complexes are panelized construction now.

Put this way the guy assembling the panels to be shipped just wants to hit his quota for the day and go home. He doesn't give a shit if the 2x4 is warped or gnarly. Nail it together based on a template and move on.

You need to work with a framer that looks at most pieces of wood to make sure it's not shit. That doesn't happen anymore. Doors don't close right and windows don't open after the first year or two of settling. Cracked drywall and tile, if they use real tile at all in most non-custom homes.

AD says

Supply: The constant construction of new homes has historically been a factor keeping prices from appreciating significantly in real terms.

I don't have the link handy, but we're at a historic low rate building wise per capita over the last 15 years roughly after the crash. The not building is the reason prices are getting out of reach for most because there is no supply. All the blue collar trades buddies I know are working on used houses not new construction. Then factor in a decade of historically low interest rates and people have low payments, why move? Rates are higher now, why build or buy a new home?

Incomes/employment need to rise or crash to see any changes. We're in a roughly 5% +/- land for most of the country housing wise. Sideways. Basically break even or make a small amount if you bought in the last 3-5 years which is what most people at minimum will stay in a home outside of job loss or movement.

The housing crash was shit lending policies to people that should have never owned a home. Plus builders buying 80 acres and dropping 140 homes on it without realizing demand would collapse. Things got desperate. Banks needed to be made whole on land and construction loans from developers so they created new lending products. Then sold them off.
505   AD   2025 Oct 22, 8:33am  

.

Economists predicting 30 year mortgage rate to remain around 6.2% until 2028. That means FHA and VA mortgage rates should be around 5.7%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/top-economist-predicts-us-mortgage-rates-through-2028/ar-AA1OXROm?pc=NMTS

.
506   AD   2025 Oct 22, 8:38am  

Rent going down should mean home prices going down as well especially in townhome HOAs like mine, where about 50% are owned by landlord investors.


507   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 22, 9:25am  

AD says

.

Economists predicting 30 year mortgage rate to remain around 6.2% until 2028. That means FHA and VA mortgage rates should be around 5.7%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/top-economist-predicts-us-mortgage-rates-through-2028/ar-AA1OXROm?pc=NMTS

.


In the last 18 months, every time the Fed has cut general interest rates, mortgage rates have increased. Yes?
508   AD   2025 Oct 22, 9:58am  

MolotovCocktail says

AD says


.

Economists predicting 30 year mortgage rate to remain around 6.2% until 2028. That means FHA and VA mortgage rates should be around 5.7%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/top-economist-predicts-us-mortgage-rates-through-2028/ar-AA1OXROm?pc=NMTS

.


In the last 18 months, every time the Fed has cut general interest rates, mortgage rates have increased. Yes?


It is what the mortgage bond traders decide same goes for the 10 Year Treasury rate. The market will decide what is the rate.

Concerns about inflation will cause the mortgage rate to increase.

Historically as far as the spreads, the 10 Yr Treasury rate is about 1.75% above annual inflation (ie., steady rate) and 30 Year mortgage rate is about 1.5% above the 10 Yr Treasury rate.

Right now you can get a money market at Schwab that pays around 4% versus government reported inflation of around 2.7%.

Money market rates will match essentially the Federal Funds Rate.
509   AD   2025 Oct 22, 11:41am  

Misc says

Shiller fails to take into account the transaction costs of the stock market. You see about 97% of listed stocks in 1890 have gone belly up to be replaced with others, that have been replaced etc After factoring in other market frictions (not buying exactly as the indexes, the bid/ask spread, having to sell in a downs year), the real rate of return for the stock market is about 1% per year.

And don't forget those pesky taxes that accrue along the way when having to sell to get the new stocks.



510   Patrick   2025 Oct 22, 12:33pm  

Stock market worked for me. I was able to retire at 55, which isn't bad.

Pretty sure if I had bought a house I would still have to work.
511   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 23, 4:57pm  

"We were told that when the Fed cuts interest rates, buyer demand would come back"

https://www.youtube.com/live/jDpLCQijQMg?si=3AwIcqgysTS907S_


512   AD   2025 Oct 24, 1:07am  

Patrick says

Stock market worked for me. I was able to retire at 55, which isn't bad.

Pretty sure if I had bought a house I would still have to work.


what's your allocation now, bossman?

30% stocks and rest in CD's and money markets ?
513   Misc   2025 Oct 25, 3:11am  

Zillow has stopped with the negative vibes man. They were forecasting housing prices to go down over the next 12 months. Welllllllll, they've updated their forecast to now estimating a positive 1,9% increase for the US housing market. Sure, it's less than the rate of inflation, but for an average $430k home, that's still over an $8k increase over the course of a year Tough to save that much for a typical person wanting to buy a home.

https://www.resiclubanalytics.com/p/zillow-revised-2026-home-price-forecast-for-over-400-housing-markets-october-2025
514   HeadSet   2025 Oct 25, 9:16am  

Misc says

but for an average $430k home, that's still over an $8k increase over the course of a year Tough to save that much for a typical person wanting to buy a home.

At 6.5%, that extra $8k adds about $50/mo. If the rate falls to an even 6%, then the payment falls by about $90 bucks despite the $8k price increase. As with cars, it is all about "how much a month" for most buyers.
515   AD   2025 Oct 26, 1:29am  

The article states: "Therefore, a fall of 10% in average home prices seems more likely than the previous boom's 20% decline. Now if unemployment spikes up to six or seven percent, home prices would face additional downward pressure, obviously. It should be also noted that in many metro regions, average home prices will fall 20% or more in places that were the epicenters in the boom. That includes Austin, Las Vegas, Phoenix as well as many cities in the Sunbelt. Home sellers now outnumber home buyers by the largest number in more than a decade."

Also the article cites information from The Wolfman (of Wolfstreet).

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4832766-the-coming-2026-housing-bust-impact-on-the-us-economy

.



.
516   Blue   2025 Oct 27, 6:00pm  

https://www.cnbc.com/select/states-with-biggest-increase-in-home-values/

Out of all other factors, inflation should be the most significant factor I think.
517   Ceffer   2025 Oct 31, 2:34pm  

Housing prices in Santa Cruz are coming down, believe it or not. Price cuts are habbening.

This place is right on a cliff overlooking the water and is a walk down the hill to the restaurant row of Capitola by the sea and the pier. Ordinarily, at the very least it would be a SiCo valley vanity acquisition.




518   Glock-n-Load   2025 Oct 31, 6:52pm  

Ceffer says

Housing prices in Santa Cruz are coming down, believe it or not. Price cuts are habbening.

This place is right on a cliff overlooking the water and is a walk down the hill to the restaurant row of Capitola by the sea and the pier. Ordinarily, at the very least it would be a SiCo valley vanity acquisition.






Half mil? That seems significant.
519   AD   2025 Oct 31, 7:03pm  

https://www.fastcompany.com/91429491/housing-market-mortgage-free-40-of-u-s-home-owners-why-the-number-keeps-growing

According to ResiClub’s analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau’s new annual data, 40.3% of U.S. owner-occupied housing units are now mortgage-free, marking a new high for this data series. That’s up from 39.8% in 2023.

The portion of homeowners with no mortgage has ticked up almost every year since 2010—when it was 32.8%.
520   MolotovCocktail   2025 Oct 31, 7:18pm  

AD says

https://www.fastcompany.com/91429491/housing-market-mortgage-free-40-of-u-s-home-owners-why-the-number-keeps-growing

According to ResiClub’s analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau’s new annual data, 40.3% of U.S. owner-occupied housing units are now mortgage-free, marking a new high for this data series. That’s up from 39.8% in 2023.

The portion of homeowners with no mortgage has ticked up almost every year since 2010—when it was 32.8%.


Good. They have plenty of equity to apply to price drops.

Oh wait! The Housing Experts of PatNet who refuse to accept reality will come up with more bullshit, I am sure.
521   WookieMan   2025 Oct 31, 7:19pm  

Glock-n-Load says

Half mil? That seems significant.

It's CA. 15% on a 2 bed home that the owner might be throwing darts blindfolded trying to sell? Gotta look at the comps and see if it was over priced. Also looks outdate and furnished like shit. Looking at water 2-4 hours a day is not worth it.

Remember our buddies, Realtors as a former one. They'll over price listings to get a buyer at that price point. They would like to sell it, but it's a common con for Realtors to over price and do a bunch of open houses and find 1-2 multimillion buyers. Sit there, drink from a flask or offer up champaign to buyers. Tough job unless you're retarded said no one.

Basically price cuts on active listing are a bad metric on the market. You have to know the motive of the seller and broker. I wasn't the listing agent but our office would commonly list homes they couldn't sell to get buyers. In CA with the price point it's likely rampant.
522   DemoralizerOfPanicans   2025 Oct 31, 7:41pm  

The "Can't sell your home in the horrible Orlando-Sanford market? We can help, cash offers..." ads are everywhere now on billboards, radio, local streaming.
523   AD   2025 Oct 31, 8:57pm  

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

The "Can't sell your home in the horrible Orlando-Sanford market? We can help, cash offers..." ads are everywhere now on billboards, radio, local streaming.


I noticed east side of Panama City Beach that 3 bedroom 2.5 bath 2 car garage townhomes built after 2006 that went for an all time high of $320,000 in 2022 (and $275,000 in 2006) are now priced around $275,000 and the bottom feeders (i.e., cash buyers who will likely try to flip them if not rent them for a couple of yeas) are offering 70% of the latest sales price (around $270,000) which is $189,000.

The same townhomes were selling for $187,000 in 2016 and $210,000 in early 2020.

« First        Comments 484 - 523 of 599       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste