patrick.net

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999. Note "... how much it will buy."

Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!

And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Wednesday, November 13, 2013 __ Level is 100.9

WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes! This was in the New York Times on August 27, 2006:

And up to date (by me) is here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

And http://patrick.net/?p=1230886

Let's see, she could ... no not for that. Well, maybe ... no, ew, no never no way. Okay then she could, no she couldn't, she wouldn't and I wouldn't want her to. So there you go, no way, no how, never, ever, ever, ever, no matter what she did or didn't do - she won't get my vote.

The populace has voted. Death! Death! Death!

Fuck bitch piss cunt spooge cock-puking ass fuck shitter!

That is: No.

As long as she promises not to go nude-she has my vote.

She has my vote.

It's about time we had a cabinet consisting of sadistic power lesbians, they will kick the world's ass!

It would help if she would put the video of her caning Bill after the Monica scandal with a bamboo rod on you tube.

If she can prove that she will be more competent and less liberal than GOP candidate.

MSNBC...LMAO

too bad they didnt break out Chris Mattews on the poll..

egads101 says

19% of this country is bat shit stupid right wingers, who would say they trust Fox news, that 2+2 = 5, then Obama claiming 2+2=4.

Roberto.. do you too get that "Tingle" when you see Obama...

APOCALYPSEFUCK is Comptroller says

PatNet Asks: How Could Hillary Clinton Get Your Vote for President?

two women enter.. one woman leaves....
.
i say its Thunderdome with Palin...Clinton hasnt got a chance...
.

Homeboy says

If it's revenue neutral, it is NOT a "fiscal shit storm". There is no "rest of the story". If you think I was claiming that there is no cost, you didn't read what I wrote. OF COURSE subsidies cost money. Duh. But they are PAID for, according to the CBO analysis. Engage your brain a bit before you throw out false charges of "dishonesty".

Oh bullshit. You posted the half the cbo information saying repealing the aca would increase the federal budget deficit. The implication is clear, that aca is somehow saving money therefore reducing the budget deficit. That's dishonest in any book.

What's with your obsession with twisting facts to make the aca look better than it is? Why won't you face up to the reality that the aca doesn't lower the cost of health care one cent. It only changes who pays. I will completely agree with you that aca will be a success if shuffling payers is your only criteria.

God it's hard to see the forest with all the fucking trees in the way.

Dan8267 says

lostand confused says

The only thing he did is make Romneycare go nationwide. ... That he is lying hypocrite is not in question. But the opposition is a bunch of loons who try and shut down the govt and make us default on our debt-something we will never be able to recover from. Sigh-is it too much to ask for a politician who cares a little bit about the country?

Well said. In the long run, Obama isn't going to be remembered as the first black president, but rather as a terrible president. Unfortunately, we're stuck with hoping for an alternative in the Democratic Party, because the Republican Party isn't going to produce a nominee that isn't god-awful.

He will be remembered as the shittiest door to door used insurance snake oil salesman, the world has ever known

thomaswong.1986 says

the liberals are silent on the matter...

My point flew over your head like a 747.

Notice how the magazine name has to imply that they are somehow the norm, or 'Standard'?

It reminds me of some other propaganda outlet that calims that it is 'Fair and Balanced'.

Call it Crazy says

Poll: More People Trust Fox News For Information

In related news...
Poll: Median American becoming stupider as smart-dumb gap continues to increase

Dan8267 says

stupider

Is that even a word that a person speaking on this topic should even be using?

Don't besmirch psychology. Occasionally, psychologists make correct diagnosis and help their patients, unlike another social "science" I know of.

That's good, I think that's the way TPTB, taxers, n bankers would want it.
This is a consumer driven economy, they are consuming, or being consumed, makes no difference to the financial systems.

And why home prices cant rise

No matter how much QE or low rates

Fucking Teatard.

He sounded like a typical 16 year old making excuses.
He ranted on Obamacare and shifted fault to everything but the lack of tought or planning that went into Obamacare, nor did he address that nobody even read the bill when it was passed.
He sugar coated the 100,000's of people that registered at the site, and did not buy coverage, claiming they were unable to choose a plan. But then in conclusion he wrapped up by saying people can browse plans just fine, that it has worked all along. So how does that work?

People aren't buying insurance through the exchange because 80% of the people who don't qualify for subsidies can't afford the premiums. And even those with subsidies still wont be able to cover their portion of the premium.

For a family working at McDonald's who for what ever reason don't qualify for Welfarecare, most likely wont be able to afford even a reduced $80 a month premium.

Shit you can't even buy two sacks of groceries for $80 these days.

The Democrats and Obama are so far out of touch with reality of the economy and plight of the working families they have become fairy tale characters more than Civil servants and politicians.

Obamacare was only created to pluck the pigeons, and America knows it.

Bill Clinton is a really smart guy, but I don't think he thought this one through. The way the system worked before is that you could get these catastrophic insurance policies, but then if you got a serious illness, you could end up bankrupt. I believe some of them didn't even cover hospitalization. The thing was, if you got sick, you couldn't then say, "Oh, by the way, I want to sign up for the good insurance that actually covers my illness", because the insurance company would simply say, "Pre-existing condition. Fuck you." So you would be SOL.

But NOW, insurance companies are legally barred from saying "fuck you". They HAVE to sell you an insurance policy, and they can't ask you if you have a pre-existing condition.

Well, you're only healthy until you're not, if you know what I mean. So would we allow the "I'm healthy right now at this moment" crowd to buy insurance policies that don't cover anything for pennies, and then when they get sick, suddenly sign up for the good policy that covers everything? O.K., who's gonna pay for that? How long do you think the system will remain solvent if everyone is on the $40/month bare bones plan and then just switches to the good plan after they get sick? As it is, the "young invincibles" will pay MUCH less than older people. That's not good enough for them? They want to pay nothing at all?

WTF? How can he change his mind? It's the LAW, remember?

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999. Note "... how much it will buy."

Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!

And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Thursday, November 14, 2013 __ Level is 101.3

WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes! This was in the New York Times on August 27, 2006:

And up to date (by me) is here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083

WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!

And http://patrick.net/?p=1230886

Given the fecal/oral route preferred by both, the comparison is valid.

APOCALYPSEFUCK is Comptroller says

Should the NAR Be Classified as a Disease Like Cholera?

No. It's a terrorist group!

I hear all real estate agencies are trained in Benghazi!

And as a terrorist group, rather than a disease, we can use drone strikes on the NAR!

APOCALYPSEFUCK is Comptroller says

PA GOP ICON Facing Investigation for Savage, Wanton Sex Attack

That's part of the GOP platform. Why do you hate freedom?

When our elected officials are not allowed to exercise their god-given right to primae noctis, freedom has no meaning and the terrorist have won.

Just in Tina turner renounces her us citizenship
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/tina-turner-relinquishes-us-citizenship-_n_4268870.html

They are disease vectors, but their condition per se is not a disease.

They're actually a degenerate subspecies - evolution does not necessarily mean improvement - known to infest all habitable parts of the world and Oxnard, California. Perhaps fortunately, interbreeding with homo sapiens produces realtor children, so a chromosome count is always unambiguous.

He had reason to believe she possessed WMDs.

That is the hope, yes.

Swerving to hit one is already somewhere below owning an unregistered bicycle as a target of prosecutorial interest. The cops are so busy fisting and administering enemas all day that I doubt they'd notice any act committed against a realtor.

By the way: Is there any evidence of a serious crime here?

Has his raping her prevented her from visiting any veteran's memorial of her choosing? Can he present a long-form birth certificate? Did any underling or representative of his spin talking points about an attack on a consulate? Can she keep her plan?

By Republican standards, I'd need to see the answers to these questions before drawing any conclusions about the man.

We are slowly starting to resemble East germany.

A whole 2000 people of 315 million. Where are we going to get enough airplanes and ships to take them all away?

That's what he gets for not giving her a Nordstrom's charge card first.

What an idiot, thinking sex is free or something.

I prefer to think of them as painful, itching hemorrhoids.

APOCALYPSEFUCK is Comptroller says

YES!

Sidewinder missile strikes on the NAR will cleanse our nation!

Sidewinders? I hadn't realized they could be used in air-to-ground capability. Seems they can indeed:

Anti-tank variant

China Lake experimented with Sidewinder in the air-to-ground mode including use as an anti-tank weapon. Starting from 2008, the AIM-9X demonstrated its ability as a successful light air-to-ground missile.[25]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-9_Sidewinder

If not there's always the tried and true Hellfire.

Homeboy says

Look, this is a chart of wealth disparity in the U.S.:

how many Madonna CDs, Tapes, and LPs did you manage to buy over
the past decades... yes, she done well alright !

bob2356 says

Oh bullshit. You posted the half the cbo information saying repealing the aca would increase the federal budget deficit. The implication is clear, that aca is somehow saving money therefore reducing the budget deficit. That's dishonest in any book.

Fucking nonsense. I posted the part that shows it's not a "fiscal shit storm". Believe me, I'm not keeping secrets from you. If you're such a fucking moron that you imagined the strawman that I was saying ACA somehow has a NEGATIVE cost, well I can't help you. You can imagine what you want, but I don't make idiotic arguments like that. But hey, keep punching that straw man if it makes you happy.

bob2356 says

What's with your obsession with twisting facts to make the aca look better than it is?

I didn't twist anything. What's YOUR obsession with making up strawman arguments? Again, you can't call something a "fiscal shit storm" if it's PAID FOR. We all know taxes were added: tanning beds, "cadillac" plans, high wage-earners, and medical device manufacturers, not to mention the penalty for not having insurance. These things pay for the system. So what do you think - you think that I KNEW all this and I lied and pretended like ACA is some kind of magic that gives people subsidies AND reduces the deficit, WITHOUT any income coming in, even though I'm ON RECORD here talking about the taxes multiple times? Fuck you. That is not what I EVER said.

bob2356 says

Why won't you face up to the reality that the aca doesn't lower the cost of health care one cent. It only changes who pays. I will completely agree with you that aca will be a success if shuffling payers is your only criteria

Excuse me, dick - I never SAID it's going to lower healthcare costs overall. I said it has slowed the rate of increase, and I said it provides subsidies for those who can't afford insurance. You can fucking well look up my posting history. Let me know when you find a post where I said rates are going down on overall average. Never said it. You may have IMAGINED I said that, but I did not.

So, if the rate of premium increase has slowed, and people can't be denied insurance, and policies are covering more essential benefits than they used to, and people who need financial help are getting subsidies, aren't we better off? I think we are. I'd sure love to hear your reasoning as to how this is worse than double-digit annual rate hikes, millions denied insurance, and illness being the number one cause of bankruptcy.

This is not just "shuffling who pays". It's certainly going to do that, but it's not a zero-sum game like you think it is. The exchanges HAVE increased competition between insurance companies and resulted in rates that came in even lower than expected. Admittedly, it's working better in the blue states, since the red states are doing everything they can to sabotage the process, but it is happening. Also, people HAVE been getting rebates from the medical loss ratio provision. But no, that's not enough to completely offset the costs of the subsidies and the cost of insuring high-risk people, and I never SAID it was. To a certain extent, the wealthy are paying a bit more in taxes in order for everyone to have a fair chance to get insurance. Sorry that bothers you; it really doesn't bother me a bit.

Are you scared to actually debate me without making up a false position that I never took? I usually like your posts, Bob, but right now you're acting like a little bitch.

It rather depends on where that "excess credit" is going, doesn't it?