patrick.net

Hater says

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance try to baffle them with bullshit.

Hey, by this time, OBAMA HAD A NOBEL PRIZE!

We can reduce reliance on airplanes with high speed railways.

Hydrogen can probably be used for jet fuel.

Also, a lot of the travel is business-related. It can be reduced due to video-conferencing.

thepaine says

Hey, by this time, OBAMA HAD A NOBEL PRIZE!

They said it wasn't for what he'd already done, but for what his Presidency would do for world and racial peace! Eight years and 4500 drone strikes later, racial tensions are at a fifty year high.

Those Norse really fucked that one up!

Ironman says

He'd been let out on $250,000 unsecured bond the day before his death

😧

Ironman says

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now independently, on its own impetus, requesting an internal vote on a full panel en banc hearing to review its own decision.

En banc determinations happen in every court of appeals. Federal Rules of Appeals title VII rule 35. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_35

You are surprised by it only because you know zero about government, laws, and the judiciary system.

How much of this stupid gun pointing at police, resulting in your untimely death, is a reflexive reaction ingrained by the local environment?
If you live in a virtual war zone you learn to react quickly to people pointing weapons at you over and over.
Then one day it happens to be a cop, and you react before you consciously analyze your situation and the odds of you surviving this encounter by not reacting.

This was caused by trump putting the court on the hook for future terrorist attacks committed by immigrant/refugees.
No way they would have asked for this otherwise. The chronology of events confirms this.
IOW's, another win for Trump!

Rule 35. En Banc Determination
(a) When Hearing or Rehearing En Banc May Be Ordered. A majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified may order that an appeal or other proceeding be heard or reheard by the court of appeals en banc. An en banc hearing or rehearing is not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless:

(1) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or
(2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frap/rule_35

Macropodia says

This was caused by trump putting the court on the hook for future terrorist attacks committed by immigrant/refugees.

No way they would have asked for this otherwise. The chronology of events confirms this.

IOW's, another win for Trump!

Sure, whatever you say dude. Overturning a presidential executive order certainly is a question of minor importance.

Ironman says

Why else would you fucking Libbies be in favor of sanctuary cities?

If the only crime is crossing border, that's one thing but if it is committing felonies such as those described in article, that's different.

Most of the people who want to prosecute small business owners probably do not actually know first thing about running a business.

most of time I'd take Mexican over lazy, entitled, usually low-class bricktuckian

Ironman says

Only about 80% of the time, but Dickhead Bobby is our resident "expert" on everything government.

Everyone on the planet is an expert on government compared to you. But it's ok, ignorance it bliss and you are maximum blissed out.

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Heres Your Card says

Trump's POTUS POINTS PLANâ„¢

Is this like MAGA! Club premium points? Can I belong to both?

It's very similar in structure, and is cross marketed. MAGA is creatively linked to the prison system now owned and run by Jared Kushner. MAGA members should already enjoy being fucked in the ass and being incarcerated. Since you are probably currently on some work-release or parole arrangement and have a prior history of prison sex you would be an optimal candidate for membership in the plan. See further details and benefits below:

https://patrick.net/1302832/2017-02-11-trump-to-send-cable-internet-costs-to-soar#comment-1379518

Did you figure out what "another" means yet Ironman?

Congrats-who said you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Ironman is SOOOOO HAPPY that FINALLY one video-taped police shooting appears to be justified. He can barely contain his glee, and is immediately trying to conflate this one shooting with the all the videos showing clearly unjustified shootings in the last several years.

Oh, the irony of Ironman talking about fake news killing people's minds. Does Ironman still have a mind to waste?

There's two parties why wouldn't one consider the other "Fake News".
I guess we're past the good ole "Fox is Partisan" days.

And what exactly is "quality journalism"? The editorial perspective that serves the journalist's master?

Obama's books make good kindling and toilet paper. Most of them are sitting in one of Soros' warehouses where he stores them after buying them off the shelves. You can buy them by the long ton for 2 dollars a ton, now.

Book Deal: the modern age laundered political bribe.

Ironman says

"It is because I say it is", the world according to Bullshit Bobby....

Ohhh boy watch out, ironman is all butthurt because his god donny boy pulled this clusterfuck out of bannon's ass (ironman being the world's most pre imminent authority on pulling things out of and sticking things into asses) and got a slapdown by the courts. Next time your caregiver changes your diaper have them put some salve on it. You will feel much better.

I am so awed by your intimidation that after dinner I'll yawn, maybe.

When the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate. In these circumstances, and in these only, may he be said (for what it may be worth) to personify the federal sovereignty. If his act is held unconstitutional under these circumstances, it usually means that the Federal Government as an undivided whole lacks power. A seizure executed by the President pursuant to an Act of Congress would be supported by the strongest of presumptions and the widest latitude of judicial interpretation, and the burden of persuasion would rest heavily upon any who might attack it.

And yet the 9th did not look at any evidence or require Washington State to meet a high standard.

Instead, it imposed an insurmountable burden on the Executive empowered by delegated powers from Congress.

As I've said, this is going to come down to Federal Powers, because it's not just the Executive but Congress who delegated their immigration authority to him. It's really the judiciary deciding what powers the ENTIRE US Government has, and whether they should be second guessing the other TWO branches on Foreign and Immigration Affairs.

bob2356 says

Sure, whatever you say dude. Overturning a presidential executive order certainly is a question of minor importance.

When was it overturned? They allowed the TRO to continue. They did not hold Washington State to a very high standard, nor did they explain why importing cheap contract Professors and full tuition paying foreign (rich, not average or pool) students for the State University system outweighs the President's Congress-granted explicit powers on National Security.

A little late with this. We already knew it.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website

Ceffer says

And what exactly is "quality journalism"?

Building an entire article to defame a politician or policy you don't agree with, based on a high ranking anonymous source.

30 years ago, an Editor would have laughed a journalist out of the office for presenting an article lacking in anything but a single anonymous source.

Today they say "Bring me the head of Open Borders opponents. Find an anonymous source to 'back up' the claim."

Wikipedia itself is an unreliable source.

"What do you call it when the unreliable calls the unreliable, 'unreliable'? It's my dream... it's my nightmare... snail... slithering along an edge."

http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376

"..a staggering 83 percent of white murder victims were killed by fellow Caucasians."
Ban & DEPORT these WHITES that HATE America & WHITE LIVES.
Including 45 for killing an American Seal. We don't need these people in MY America.

http://atlantablackstar.com/2015/03/03/9-facts-white-white-crime-far-exceeds-black-black-crime-media-conceals/2/

Beatcha by a few minutes.

justme says

Oh, the irony of Ironman talking about fake news killing people's minds. Does Ironman still have a mind to waste?

You are one of the few true believers here on Patnet that doesn't fully gulp down the biased left wing sources.

I'll remind for instance that the Pink panther and I forget who else recently dismissed the Breitbart articles I posted WHERE THERE WAS VIDEO ACCOMPANYING ONE AND DIRECT FULL IN CONTEXT QUOTE IN THE OTHER. Literally nothing was opinion in those articles but they were summarily dismissed as bs because it's Breitbart, which incredibly proves to be more reliable in some cases than the msm. So that's who you are dealing with on the left...many who are so msnbheehaw'ed that they refuse direct factual evidence including video recorded incidents.

That's not even addressing the plethora of recent fake left accounts that continuously spew all over Pat net with demonstrably "fake" news.

No problem, Patnetters are BRAIN DEAD.

T L Lipsovich says

Find an anonymous source to 'back up' the claim."

They also use "experts agree" quite a bit without ever naming the experts. You name the issue, there are nebulous experts agreeing with their hit piece.

i have never met anyone who came from these countries. the liberal freaks are wasting Trump's time and tax payers' money. i'm pretty they don't give a shit about the Muslim and they'll probably cry like bitches and "demand answers" if their friends or family get BBQ'd in the WTC buildings.

Tim Aurora says

So where is Trump's tax returns so that we can argue back

the income before trump was elected into a government office? sounds like a dumb ass argument to make.

obama became a senator in january of 2005. then, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

http://truepundit.com/white-house-trump-is-personally-paying-for-japanese-pms-trip-to-mar-a-lago/

President Donald Trump will personally pay for Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to visit his private residence inMar-a-Lago, Florida this weekend, the White House says. Abe and several other Japanese officials will arrive Friday for a meeting at the White House with Trump and members of his team. After the meeting in Washington, D.C., the two heads of state will travel to Florida. There were some early concerns about who would pay for what, but officials are now saying that Trumpwill personallypay for the prime ministers trip.

Why doesn't Trump pay for the wall himself?

landtof says

obama became a senator in january of 2005. then, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Because people bought his book. Are you implying something nefarious there?

joeyjojojunior says

Because people bought his book. Are you implying something nefarious there?

In January 2005, the same month he joined the Senate, he got approval from its ethics committee for a $1.9 million advance against royalties with Random House for two non-fiction books and one children’s book .... ... In the two weeks before he was inaugurated as the 44th president, Obama reworked his book deals.

sounds like using one's political influence to cash in, right?

"selling books" is one of the oldest forms of money under the table.

1. do favors while in office for criminals.
2. write some garbage books.
3. criminals set up fake online bookstores and order tons of these garbage books then burn them.
4. the perfect crime. it's both bribery and money laundering all in once.

Ceffer says

Book Deal: the modern age laundered political bribe.

RIght. Just happened to coincidentally be very profitable for the publishers too. But he didn't get the book deals because of expectations of profit. IT was a bribe ?