8
1

Where did Russia go?


 invite response                
2017 Aug 1, 5:49pm   42,392 views  204 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (61)   💰tip   ignore  

How come it's not Russia 24/7 anymore on NPR, CNN, and in the NY Times?

Have they run out of lame tenuous connections that no one is buying and which break no laws? Seemed like they could make up a new story every week for the last 8 months.

Or have they realized that investigating further looks more likely to incriminate Hillary than Trump?

« First        Comments 53 - 92 of 204       Last »     Search these comments

53   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 19, 1:07pm  

Tenpoundbass says
Now to the American voter it flies in their faces, that they accuse Trump of Colluding while they watched the trumped up made up charges start since before he was even elected. The made up charges even changed in scale and scope. When one fails they invent another, the unrestricted phising expeditions. It's just so transparently sickening and will cost the Democrat and the Establishment candidates in the next elections.


Why, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and Florida were lost because RT spent $20,000 on some Facebook or whatever.

Man, Putin is better at spending campaign money than a whole army of lifetime US Election Professionals. Look at the ROI he got! Podesta was spending a million or more a day for Hillary, Putin dropped what, $100k for the whole of 2016.
54   LeonDurham   2018 Jun 19, 1:56pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
What is going on with the Lefties today?

Reality Denial and Projection out in force.

I think they just realized Trump isn't just a Lucky Monkey, and that they have an implacable foe.


I believe that's against the rules laid down by Goran.

You are clearly referencing me in that post.
55   MrMagic   2018 Jun 19, 7:56pm  

LeonDurham says
No, LOTS of evidence. Literally TONS.

Did you see the latest?


Don't know, did you see the latest Russian collusion story? Is this FAKE news?

I wonder how many "TONS" he knows...

FBI Agent Strzok Was Escorted Out Of FBI Building

In the aftermath of the publication of the Inspector General's report on FBI abuse, if there was one thing that was made abundantly clear, it was that FBI special agent Peter Strzok - who was in charge of the Clinton email investigation and then probed Trump for "Russian collusion" while texting his lover Lisa Page that "we'll stop" Trump from becoming president - was acting out of pure, political bias and anger at Clinton's loss.

And while Lisa Page had the wits to quit shortly before the publication of the OIG report, Strzok did not and in fact was still employed at the time of the report's publication last Thursday. But maybe not much longer because as CNN first reported, Strzok was escorted out of the FBI building on Friday, even though he is still technically employed and, as we reported some time ago, he has been stationed in Human Resources since dismissal from Mueller team.

Shortly after the report, Strzok's attorney confirmed the report saying that Strzok was escorted from the building amid an internal review of his conduct.

But wait, it gets even better, because in the very next line Strzok's attorney complains about the "impartiality of the disciplinary process, which now appears tainted by political influence." Yes, this coming from the "impartial" and "unbiased" FBI agent who led a failed coup against the president, vowing to "stop" Trump, an act which in another time would have much more serious consequences than simple termination and being expelled from the FBI.

To all this, all we can add is that while there is still zero evidence that Trump "colluded" with Russian, Strzok's expulsion from the FBI building is sufficient proof that the FBI was engaged in what effectively amounts to collusion, if not conspiracy, against a democratically elected US president.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-19/fbi-agent-strzok-was-escorted-out-fbi-building
56   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 19, 8:17pm  

LeonDurham says
I believe that's against the rules laid down by Goran.

You are clearly referencing me in that post.


No, I actually wasn't. It was all the Lefties I encountered both here and on twitter early this morning. They were like taking a speed boat up De Nial.
57   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 19, 8:18pm  

TrumpingTits says
How does one say Nothingburger in Russian?


Fignya... Literally "Figs"
58   LeonDurham   2018 Jun 20, 6:16am  

TwoScoopsOfWompWomp says
No, I actually wasn't. It was all the Lefties I encountered both here and on twitter early this morning. They were like taking a speed boat up De Nial.


lol--OK.

The hypocrisy of the moderation is hilarious.
60   Onvacation   2018 Jun 20, 6:43am  

LeonDurham says

The hypocrisy of the moderation is hilarious.

Obtuse dickishness will not be tolerated!
61   LeonDurham   2018 Jun 20, 6:53am  

Onvacation says

Obtuse dickishness will not be tolerated!


If that were true, there would be no site.
62   Bd6r   2018 Jun 20, 7:28am  

TwoScoopsOfWompWomp says
How does one say Nothingburger in Russian?


Fignya... Literally "Figs"

That is the most polite expression...a more colorful one is huynja (хуйня) which is derived from hui=cock.
63   komputodo   2018 Jun 20, 7:31am  

someone else says
How come it's not Russia 24/7 anymore on NPR, CNN, and in the NY Times?


Don't distract me, I'm focusing on Maddow and "kid's in cages" right now
64   Shaman   2018 Jun 20, 8:23am  

Onvacation says
Obtuse dickishness will not be tolerated!


That’s true. Only intelligent jackassery is respected here!
65   Shaman   2018 Jun 20, 9:24am  

LeonDurham says
Not sure if there really was collusion, but there sure as hell is evidence of it


Oh there most definitely was collusion with Russia! And there is ample evidence uncovered by the investigation of congress! Hillary’s Campaign colluded with Russian officials to produce a dirty “pee pee dossier” to use in an attempt to smear their opposition! This is KNOWN FACT!
67   Patrick   2018 Oct 2, 10:01pm  

Hey, whatever happened to the "Russia conspiracy"? How come there is still zero evidence?

And where are the incredibly damaging revelations that we were promised would come from indicting Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen?

Could it be that perhaps Russia was not actually involved in the election, and that the American people themselves elected Trump?

And that Trump is actually relatively clean, as politicians go?
68   FortWayne   2018 Oct 2, 10:07pm  

Democratic party runs from one boogey man to another, until they find one that catches on.

Hate Russia... didn't work.
Hate White men... seems to work <-- current strategy

They are really fucked up people, in how they try to play us all for personal gain.
69   Patrick   2018 Oct 2, 10:19pm  

Aphroman says
I’ve read APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch lay out in detail the known particulars of Trump laundering Russian Oligarch money thru Trump Tower


I'm sure that the Democratic Party would be desperately hyping this angle if there were any evidence at all.

And yet they are not. Conclusion?
70   bob2356   2018 Oct 2, 10:39pm  

Patrick says
Hey, whatever happened to the "Russia conspiracy"? How come there is still zero evidence?

And where are the incredibly damaging revelations that were were promised would come from indicting Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen?

Could it be that perhaps Russia was not actually involved in the election, and that the American people themselves elected Trump?


Nice job setting up a total strawman. Russian interference in the election never depended on any "conspiracy" to work with them.. There is undeniable evidence of Russian interference which was going to happen if anyone in trumps campaign conspired with them or not. Lack of conspiracy with the trump campaign doesn't preclude Russian interference in the election no matter how many times you click your heels and say i wish it were true.
71   mell   2018 Oct 2, 10:53pm  

Patrick says
Aphroman says
I’ve read APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch lay out in detail the known particulars of Trump laundering Russian Oligarch money thru Trump Tower


I'm sure that the Democratic Party would be desperately hyping this angle if there were any evidence at all.

And yet they are not. Conclusion?


Any day now.
72   komputodo   2018 Oct 2, 11:45pm  

someone else says
Where did Russia go?


On the sidelines with omarosa, kids in cages, BLM, grabbing pussy, the wall, N. Korea, the NFL, etc....now we must focus on Roe vs Wade....remind me why a 60 yr old man should give a shit about Roe vs Wade.
73   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Oct 3, 12:37am  

Patrick says
Hey, whatever happened to the "Russia conspiracy"? How come there is still zero evidence?


Hey, speaking of evidence, haven't heard much about Mueller these past weeks, either.
74   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2018 Oct 3, 5:31am  

bob2356 says
Patrick says
Hey, whatever happened to the "Russia conspiracy"? How come there is still zero evidence?

And where are the incredibly damaging revelations that were were promised would come from indicting Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen?

Could it be that perhaps Russia was not actually involved in the election, and that the American people themselves elected Trump?


Nice job setting up a total strawman. Russian interference in the election never depended on any "conspiracy" to work with them.. There is undeniable evidence of Russian interference which was going to happen if anyone in trumps campaign conspired with them or not. Lack of conspiracy with the trump campaign doesn't preclude Russian interference in the election no matter how many times you click your heels and say i wish it were true.


Wait, you are admitting that there is no evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russia regarding the 2016 election?
78   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Feb 23, 6:36pm  

Where DID Russia Go?

Replaced with Racist Trump Supporters?
79   Patrick   2020 Apr 11, 10:14am  

https://saraacarter.com/fbis-central-evidence-to-spy-on-trump-campaign-was-russian-disinformation-declassified-ig-footnotes-reveal/

Partially declassified footnotes from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s FBI report reveal that the most ‘central and essential’ evidence to justify surveillance of short term Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page was based on Russian disinformation, according to newly declassified footnotes. In January, U.S. Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, sent a classified letter questioning the contradiction between the footnotes and what was made public by Horowitz’s team regarding the bureau’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation....

The declassification came at the request Grassely and Johnson, whose committees have been dedicated to uncovering the truth regarding the FBI’s malfeasance during the bureau’s probe into President Donald Trump’s campaign and its now debunked theory that campaign officials colluded with Russia. ...

Johnson, who spoke to this reporter Friday said that the American people deserve the whole truth and that revelations in the partially declassified footnotes reveals that some members of the FBI’s top echelon “were total and complete snakes.” Johnson told this reporter Friday that he expects further declassification of the footnotes by early next week. ...

“Why have all these details remained unnecessarily secret for so long? In our dual system of Justice, the Mueller Witch Hunt crew falsely misrepresented my own “historical contact with persons and entities suspected of being linked to RIS, when I was actually serving my country in support of the U.S. Intelligence Community,” Page told this reporter. “The time has finally come for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and related agencies to release the full facts about the Obama-Biden Administration’s election interference campaign against candidate Trump and the illicit coup attempt against our President.”


So the Democrats/Media/FBI deep state were using Russian disinformation in an attempt to subvert US democracy.

Just great.
80   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2020 Apr 11, 10:15am  

No one is checking on caged kids either.
81   Patrick   2020 Apr 11, 11:54am  

Dude, please.

It's literally been years of rigged investigations and they still got nothing.
82   Ceffer   2020 Apr 11, 12:51pm  

Every country interferes with the political process of every other country. If they didn't they would be viewed as weak. Of course Russia interferes in our political process, even if it is token, because they would otherwise be viewed as sissies.
83   Patrick   2020 Apr 11, 1:37pm  

And we do the same.

Point is, the whole Russia thing was a deliberate hoax put on by our own FBI to try to prevent democracy from functioning in America.

This is really serious.
84   Patrick   2020 May 13, 12:13am  

https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts-11589326164


All the Adam Schiff Transcripts
Newly released documents show he knew all along that there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion.

Americans expect that politicians will lie, but sometimes the examples are so brazen that they deserve special notice. Newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff spread falsehoods shamelessly about Russia and Donald Trump for three years even as his own committee gathered contrary evidence.

The House Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election. The committee probe started in January 2017 under then-Chair...


Paywall dammit. But you get the idea.

Schiff knew that the Russia accusations were bogus all along.
85   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2020 May 13, 12:25am  

sounds like accusations have turned around, as there was no russia evidence, but plenty of lies from the left evidence. so left wing media is sweeping their bullshit under the rug, until they figure out some other way to mindfuck america.
86   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 May 13, 6:18pm  

jazz_music says
It doesn't matter how true it is any more since the special prosecutor decided not to prosecute.


So true and beyond doubt that the House decided not to Impeach over Russian Collusion, either.
87   Onvacation   2020 May 13, 6:29pm  

jazz_music says
Congress impeached Trump on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

No. Some geriatric idiots in the senate were desperate to cover up their shortcomings so they Trumped up some charges that had little basis in reality. They passed this travesty over to the Senate where it was given its due process after which the congressional impeachment process exonerated him.

89   Onvacation   2020 May 13, 6:33pm  

jazz_music says
when was orange man EVER good?

You guys would be more productive to be for something instead of just against Trump.

It didn't work for Hillary and it won't work for Joe.
90   Patrick   2020 May 13, 6:48pm  

Onvacation says
would be more productive to be for something instead of just against Trump


Exactly!

Democrats have nothing positive to offer.

Democrats have only hate for the orange man, nothing else. OK, maybe tranny bathrooms. But that's not a positive unless you are a child molester.

They would do much better if they would steal Trump's thunder, and talk about how China fucked the US with help from almost every American CEO, and how mass illegal immigration fucks the US working class.

But they can't do that. Their mouths are stuffed full of globalist cock, so they cannot speak.
91   Patrick   2020 May 13, 6:54pm  

jazz_music says
Deregulation is really bad too


Not necessarily.

Most regulations are designed to prevent competition by rivals and not to protect the public.

John Kenneth Galbraith introduced me to this idea. It seems to be correct.

When any corporation accumulates enough power, it creates regulations specifically to hinder free market competition.
92   Bd6r   2020 May 13, 7:04pm  

jazz_music says
Deregulation is really bad too, that’s exactly the opposite of what we need.

Problem is not deregulation as such, but that after deregulation banksters do stupid stuff and then politicians bail them out on public dime. Without bailouts, next generation of banksters would be more careful (after the previous generation would have gone broke and FUCKING JUMPED OUT OF WINDOWS).

The SOP is as follows: banksters first whine about too much regulations, and when those are removed (after hefty bribes), they go all out with stupid stuff, pay themselves billions, company is driven into ground, and then they go to politicians, bribe them once more - and - voila! - banks are solvent again, but banksters are billions richer.

Either very few regulations and no bailouts whatsoever, or turn banks into highly regulated public utilities with CEO of bank earning on order of US Pres salary, no bonuses, What we have now is an abomination, worst of those two combined.

« First        Comments 53 - 92 of 204       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste