by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 100,429 - 100,468 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
“He put a lot of American federal workers through hell for nothing. This whole idea of building the wall was not something that had any validity on Capitol Hill,” said former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele. “If this was a such a priority for them, why didn’t they pass it over the last two years?”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/national/smaller-government-some-trump-supporters-cheer-the-shutdown/2019/01/26/4679c2ca-218d-11e9-a759-2b8541bbbe20_story.html
speaking for the establishment that wants access to illegal aliens to depress labor prices, don't you?
To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.
The NY Times reported the case of one man in 2009 who found out after three years that his daughter was not his. He continued to pay child support but when his wife later married the child’s biological father, he sued to end paternity rights. He lost the case. He loves his child but is paying for “a biologically intact family.” The biological father didn’t show up in court but his ex-wife did and contested it. She won and continued to receive support payments from the man she defrauded. ...
Many worry that the state will be forced to pick up the costs of supporting the children if men are allowed to bow out of paternity.
Last year, the Toronto Sun reported a case of a father in Canada who discovered after 16 years of marriage that three of his four children were not his and were sired by three different men. He was ordered to pay child support despite this revelation. The man knew his wife cheated but he didn’t expect the results to be what they were.
If the man acts like the father, he is the father in some states. There is a time limit on how long a man can request a change in payments.
“If this was a such a priority for them, why didn’t they pass it over the last two years?”
The tactic, which cops have deployed for months in states like Oklahoma, is a new twist in “civil forfeiture,” a controversial legal process that lets police seize funds from motorists if they suspect money is tied to a drug crime. Critics, however, liken the practice to banditry—noting the police use forfeiture to pay themselves, and that citizens must take extraordinary legal measures to get their money back.
The arrival of the handheld ERAD machines, which stands for Electronic Recovery and Access to Data, comes at a time when fewer people are carrying cash. They work by imitating the payment terminals found at ordinary retailers, and allowing cops to slurp up the values found on pre-paid cards for Visa (v, +0.68%) , Starbucks (sbux, +3.01%) and so on.
For now, it appears the ERAD devices are only able to siphon funds from pre-paid cards, and not from a driver’s personal bank account or credit card.
Patrick saysOf course if Trump were really serious about protecting US workers, he would be proposing mandatory prison time for all employers of illegals. But he hasn't done that, so that inspires doubt.
I'd say D's would have much harder time fighting against this proposal as it would involve weeping CEO's hauled off to prison instead of weeping minority womyn on TV. Perhaps that is why it is not suggested? Or R's are dead set against this proposal, since their sponsors would be ones going to prison?
But has Trump been good for your personal security and prosperity
mental genius
you think he'd of seen this coming
Convicted felons already lose their freedom. They get imprisoned.
I'm not sure felons have a right to privacy for their DNA.
Everyone arrested is guilty?
WTF?
It's good they don't ticket for cutting the cheese while driving, I'd be in big trouble.
I use an electric shaver every morning on my way into work. Been doing so for over a quarter century. Time saver!
Was he eating it out of his girl friend's tweetie?
It's good they don't ticket for cutting the cheese while driving, I'd be in big trouble.
Ceffer saysWas he eating it out of his girl friend's tweetie?
Yes and she was sitting on the dashboard in front of him.
So your counter to his accusation that it’s a witch hunt is that he’s a witch?
You can't argue with the level and degree of Stupid that the Liberals will stoop to.
Well you can, but then that would make you a Democrat as well.
« First « Previous Comments 100,429 - 100,468 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,632 comments by 15,164 users - goofus, Misc online now