invite response« First « Previous Comments 74 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2013 Nov 7, 2:28pm
Good god. How the hell do you all not know what a plaintiffs filing is?
1.) Roberto Ribas loves and craves cock.
2.) Roberto Ribas does not discriminate. In fact he loves all sorts of cocks.
3.) Roberto Ribas has blown latino men, asian men, black men and others.
4.) Roberto Ribas does not discriminate by species. In fact he has sucked off cows, dogs, pigs, horses, and others. .
5.) Robert Ribas is a bottom. He takes dick of all sorts in his rectum. He loves it and begs for more.
OK, NOW DO YOU ALL GET IT?!?!?!?! This is exactly how a plaintiffs filing reads. It alleges stuff that may or may not be true. You have no idea. But to use it as the basis for a news article is completely preposterous.
Let the damn story shake out a bit...let it go to settlement talks, depositions, and even trial before passing judgement.
elliemae
2013 Nov 7, 11:00pm
A few years ago I was driving in SoCal, from Orange County to Palmdale (please don't judge me!); I was stopped at Mulholland. I have Utah plates & it was a Monday night, traffic was going about 75mph & I was a little slower, going 70.
There were grooves in the concrete road that tossed my little car around a bit and I was pulled over. The officer asked me how much I had drank, where I was coming from, where I was going, names of who I was with before, names of who I was going to see. Then he shined a light in my car and asked me what was in the bag in the back seat - it was my crocheting.
He asked these questions several times, several ways. Even asked addresses. I didn't know my sister's address in Palmdale but knew the street and told him that. He asked me how I knew I was in the right place when I got there if I didn't have an address and I told him my sister hadn't mowed her lawn in so long it now qualified as a nature preserve.
He was obviously disappointed and let me go (finally); he told me that if I had been going the speed limit he would have pulled me over for impeding traffic. He fucking profiled me!
I wasn't on a road to Utah, it was a Monday night, he thought he found a drug runner and instead he found a boring mom from Utah.
Shaman
2013 Nov 7, 11:25pm
Ellie, why didn't you insist on a cavity search? I know if I was you, I'd have felt a bit rejected.
HydroCabron
2013 Nov 7, 11:38pm
A few years ago I was driving in SoCal, from Orange County to Palmdale (please don't judge me!);
Guffaw!
It's all right: You have to hit bottom and admit what you have done, because only then can you find the true path.
Ceffer
2013 Nov 8, 2:02am
A few years ago I was driving in SoCal, from Orange County to Palmdale (please don't judge me!); I was stopped at Mulholland.
You just don't know the ropes.
On Mulholland, you are expected to tell him you are an aspiring actress and pull out his junk for a quickie, at which point you are let go with a warning to come back frequently during his shift.
MisdemeanorRebel
2013 Nov 8, 2:53am
THIRD Victim:
http://rt.com/usa/new-mexico-cavity-search-victim-451/
Eckert, Young, and now an unidentified Woman.
MisdemeanorRebel
2014 Feb 3, 12:50am
He got $1.6M from the city, er taxpayer.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/16/justice/new-mexico-search-settlement/
But a middle-aged woman is now filing a law suit for being "Anally and Vaginally Raped" by officer friendlies. No drugs were discovered:
http://www.demingheadlight.com/deming-news/ci_25020174/new-lawsuit-alleges-illegal-nm-body-cavity-search
It's unknown as to whether the cops are still employed:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/21/lawsuit-in-nm-anal-cavity-search-pending-but-are-officers-still-on-job-1968935427/
“This case took my breath away,†said Jonathan Turley, a nationally recognized legal scholar and professor at the George Washington University Law School in Washington, D.C.“If officers are not fired for this level of abuse, particularly after such a huge settlement in damages, it sends a rather chilling message. It suggests that there is no abuse that will cost an officer his or her job.â€
NM probably has cop-run "oversight boards" that exonerate cops. They're the FISA courts of police misconduct, rubbing stamping anything cops do 99.99% of the time.
Tenpoundbass
2014 Feb 3, 1:01am
Wait until he gets the bill, Colonoscopies aren't cheap, even with Obamacare.
« First « Previous Comments 74 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
The state which exists to make Arizona feel better about itself.
http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S3209305.shtml?cat=500#.Unm_0DK9KK2
The incident began January 2, 2013 after David Eckert finished shopping at the Wal-Mart in Deming. According to a federal lawsuit, Eckert didn't make a complete stop at a stop sign coming out of the parking lot and was immediately stopped by law enforcement...
after law enforcement asked him to step out of the vehicle, he appeared to be clenching his buttocks. Law enforcement thought that was probable cause to suspect that Eckert was hiding narcotics in his anal cavity....
1. Eckert's abdominal area was x-rayed; no narcotics were found.
2. Doctors then performed an exam of Eckert's anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.
3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert's anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.
4. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
5. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema a second time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
6. Doctors penetrated Eckert's anus to insert an enema a third time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
7. Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.
8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert's anus, rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were found.
Throughout this ordeal, Eckert protested and never gave doctors at the Gila Regional Medical Center consent to perform any of these medical procedures.