patrick.net

My picture is all ready to go, boys. I even have accessories, including my "Debt is Slavery" bumper sticker. But Trump must be officially nominated. To jump the gun would be to tempt fate. Your preview can be found on Landtof's avatar.

DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

We do have standards here at PatNet.

It only takes the Glomar Explorer to find them.

freespeechforever says

Turtledove either shows her breasts as Trump is nominee or she is a liar...

And how would you know they are her breasts and not just something from Google image search?

Btw, I would have made the same bet with my penis except that there aren't enough pixels in a high definition display to capture the damn thing.

This whole thread reminds me of Hedonismbot.

www.youtube.com/embed/r4EsvEgPZ84

Dan8267 says

I would have made the same bet with my penis

Your penis has nipples?

Dan8267 says

And how would you know they are her breasts and not just something from Google image search?

I have some identifying accessories on me that would make the photo difficult to fake. I hate to ruin the surprise, so you'll just have to wait to find out.

turtledove says

I have some identifying accessories

Hope you haven't hung trinkets or scribbled on your body.

Yawn. Are any guys offering to post a dick-pic on Patnet if Trump wins? No? Is that because they're shy, or is it because they know that there will not be a fan-club of female dick afficionados fawning over the prospect of seeing your dick on teh interwebs?

Yep. I pledged a slideshow of my head, shaft, and balls if Bernie wins the nomination.

In the meantime you can pay your tokens like everyone else on #chaturbate if you're being impatient

errc says

Yep. I pledged a slideshow of my head, shaft, and balls if Bernie wins the nomination.

Any sign of a fawning fan-club yet?

Patrick asked me to rescind because It kept crashing his servers. Pussy

FP says

Hope you haven't hung trinkets or scribbled on your body.

We wouldn't want to do anything to mar the sanctity of an unobscured titty photo.

I'm expecting something like this (NSFW):
https://i.sli.mg/Z5XsU2.jpg

justme says

Yawn. Are any guys offering to post a dick-pic on Patnet if Trump wins? No? Is that because they're shy, or is it because they know that there will not be a fan-club of female dick afficionados fawning over the prospect of seeing your dick on teh interwebs?

Because nobody wants to see those. Not even the ladies. Errc don't do that shit. Or at least for godsakes add a trigger warning.

turtledove says

Dan8267 says

And how would you know they are her breasts and not just something from Google image search?

I have some identifying accessories on me that would make the photo difficult to fake. I hate to ruin the surprise, so you'll just have to wait to find out.

We trust you turtle, and look forward to the greatest exposure ever on Patnet.

errc says

Yep. I pledged a slideshow of my head, shaft, and balls if Bernie wins the nomination.

Clinton just won. Your balls are safe.
Sorry Dan.
I personally would much prefer to view Turtle's breasts.

just_passing_through says

justme says

Yawn. Are any guys offering to post a dick-pic on Patnet if Trump wins? No? Is that because they're shy, or is it because they know that there will not be a fan-club of female dick afficionados fawning over the prospect of seeing your dick on teh interwebs?

Because nobody wants to see those. Not even the ladies. Errc don't do that shit. Or at least for godsakes add a trigger warning.

Oh theres plenty of GUYS that want to see that. Theyre just being bashful.

dodgerfanjohn says

Oh theres plenty of GUYS that want to see that. Theyre just being bashful.

Nobody who's anybody on patnet wants to see that. (clarification)

Yeah, I hate blocking people but I had to once. Too painful on the eyes.

zzyzzx says

I'm expecting something like this (NSFW):

https://i.sli.mg/Z5XsU2.jpg

I thought there was a little piece of lettuce above her right breast... but upon closer inspection, I think it's a bird, of some kind. That's pretty impressive z! She's got what appears to be a bird reference... and a Trump reference... The proportions are remarkably similar. Well done! Perhaps Dan was on to something! Except she's missing the Patnet reference... I'll tell you this much, I didn't use paint.

I know she's married, and I'm a classy guy, sooooo....

...I'll be the 1st to give her a pass and defend her if she chooses not to bare her breasts, no matter the reason.

I'm actually very worried about the current condition and future course of the nation. :

This whole titties from Trump campaign pretty much epitomizes his campaign. Yay titties - let's vote for Trump. The nomination raises the next question. What will TD do if Trump wins presidency?

Titties For Trump sounds a whole lot more tantalizing that Butts for Bernie or Dykes for Hillary.

I'm pretty sure it's blow jobs for Bernie. They will be given out for free. Don't worry, the provider network will be paid $15/hr, and Mexican's will not have to recuse themselves due to any obvious conflicts of interest.

Hillary's not using body parts or sexual favors. That will eventually be her undoing.

YesYNot says

Hillary's not using body parts or sexual favors. That will eventually be her undoing.

Judging by the shape she's in, I'm guessing it will be her undoing either way. No one wants to see THAT! When she's lecturing people about the evils of the 1%, it's best she just continue to keep it covered under one of her $12,000 Armani housecoats.

Yeah like how they defended her table cloth Grandma garb by putting a lofty price tag on it, and saying it was Armani.

Niggapuleeze!

I didn't know Armani made tents and tarps.

More than $12,000 for this ugly, shapeless garment she wore to her speech about inequality.

Lloyd Blankfein calls them Armani wipes.

The problem isn't the tarp. It's what's underneath. If Donald tried to go down on Hillary, his necks would get blocked by her hemorrhoids and taint fat. Unfortunately for Trump, Armani doesn't make a neck tarp. The only solution is a properly worn hijab, which would also protect his perfectly quaffed (like a duck) hair.

Rumor has it that the duck wanted to wear a hijab on windy days, but his staff told him he would lose all of his white supremacist voter block.

turtledove says

More than $12,000 for this ugly, shapeless garment she wore to her speech about inequality.

That's a lot of money for a tablecloth.

YesYNot says

This whole titties from Trump campaign pretty much epitomizes his campaign. Yay titties - let's vote for Trump.

Yesterday's SF Chronicle featured an article about "personalized naked pictures" promised to be sent to people who vote for Bernie in primaries.

I was just thinking... We've never really discussed terms... I said that I would put up the new avatar, but I never said for how long. 24... 48 hours?

Then you have the aspect of people who don't support the Trump or Bernie movements. I, personally, am not a Bernie supporter, however, I get why people want him. At some level, this is for them, as well. We all agree that more of the same is bad for this country. I don't agree with Bernie's specific solutions, but I respect the movement that puts the will of people above the establishment.

The question is... what do we do with the Hillary supporters? They shouldn't get to partake. It would cheapen the moment.

Those fruitcups dont even like tits, fuck them

errc says

Those fruitcups dont even like tits, fuck them

That's not what Yoko says....

turtledove says

More than $12,000 for this ugly, shapeless garment she wore to her speech about inequality.

She could have gotten this for $25.00 from Kmart.

turtledove says

The question is... what do we do with the Hillary supporters? They shouldn't get to partake. It would cheapen the moment.

You are trying to share soft porn on the internet, and make it exclusive some how?

Strategist says

She could have gotten this for $25.00 from Kmart.

Maybe she just borrowed it from Kim Jong-un? Looks very similar to outfits I've seen him wear.

Strategist says

More than $12,000 for this ugly, shapeless garment she wore to her speech about inequality.

She could have gotten this for $25.00 from Kmart

How do we know she didn't? $25 for the tablecloth, $24,975 to the store for closing it while she shopped. Just sayin'

I could be on to something...

YesYNot says

You are trying to share soft porn on the internet, and make it exclusive some how?

Exclusive is too strong of a word. I just want to increase their hassle factor. Why should I make it easy for them? And that goes double for people who irritate me, in general. I'm going to follow through with what I promised, but I don't have to make it easy for people I dislike. I'm not that generous. I mean, I am a republican for goodness sake. We don't care much for easy freebies to useless freeloaders.